Is Obama foolish or insane? Why did he include anti-job measures in his jobs bill?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by James Cessna, Oct 16, 2011.

  1. James Cessna

    James Cessna New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    13,369
    Likes Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This discussion was revealing and very good.

    It turns out, for some odd reason, Obama has foolishly included many anti-job measures in his latest jobs bill, the $447 billion American Jobs Act of 2011.

    Why on earth would Obama do this? Does he not listen to his closest advisors? Are his Marxist roots so deep that he cannot divorce himself from them? Here is a list of the major short comings with his latest attempts to get our economy moving in the right direction again.

    "Obama has vowed to forge ahead with his jobs plan, fulfilling that well-known definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. In February 2009, Congress enacted the $825 billion American Reinvestment and Recovery Act. Since then, the U.S. economy has lost an additional 1.5 million workers."

     
  2. James Cessna

    James Cessna New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    13,369
    Likes Received:
    572
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This discussion was very good.

    We must conclude from these comments the "man-child" we have as president does not know what he is doing!

    "Obama has vowed to forge ahead with his jobs plan, fulfilling that well-known definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result. In February 2009, Congress enacted the $825 billion American Reinvestment and Recovery Act. Since then, the U.S. economy has lost an additional 1.5 million workers.

    The Obama administration can argue that the stimulus “created or saved” 3.5 million jobs, and that the economy would have been in worse shape without it, but those assertions can’t be tested or proved. Only in model-land can econometricians pinpoint outcomes to the nearest 10th of a percentage point.

    If the stimulus had been successful, Obama wouldn’t be hawking version 2.0, with many of the same short-term incentives that didn’t fool those it was designed to help.

    That means we have to rely on Congress, not a reliable source of salvation, to nix the many anti-job measures in the jobs- wanting bill."
     

Share This Page