DC Circuit Court of Appeals completely ignores Founding Intent in Decison

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by SiliconMagician, Nov 11, 2011.

  1. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The DC Court of Appeals in it's recent decision intentionally ignored founding intent when issuing it's ruling:

    From the Decisions itself:

    http://thinkprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/DC-aca-opinion.pdf



    Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. This all goes back to FDR and his (*)(*)(*)(*)ing socialist administration. FDR was as scummy tryant who inflicted on this nation a tyranny as grave and evil as the one inflicted on the Venezuelan people by Hugo Chavez. President for life FDR was a socialist scumbag, and we can look directly to him and the commies that infiltrated his administration and Government for a short while and left the precedent necessary for this. A precedent so cruel and tyrannical that said it could force a man with no money to afford food on the open market to none the less purchase that food on the market rather than grow his own.

    Well, the Roberts Court is notoriously originalist, let us hope and pray they they won't toss the American People and our freedom under the bus when the Supreme Court rules next year based on an extorted decision of a threatened Supreme Court.

    What kind of Country that calls itself "free" tells a man with no money to purchase food that his civic duty is to starve to death rather than grow his own food? Does that sound free to you?

    This country in those days was a socialist dictatorship every bit as tyrannical as Joe Stalin's and Hitler's. That dark shady past should be clearly broken with, if not by court action, then by Congressional Action in the future under a properly patriotic and freedom loving Republican Congress.

    If there is a hell, I hope that crippled commie we called a President is burning in it!
     
  2. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Its just as it is inter state commerce as per stated in the doctrines of the land.

    Good job to the court
     
  3. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, it's not. The Court specifically stated that it is not interstate commerce, but used the precedent from an ancient decision handed down during a time when the court was under extortionate threat from the communist mole that somehow got elected President in a time when the education of the average American was 8th grade, or 15 years old.

    So in a time when the average mentality of an American was that of a teenager a commie populist took over and installed himself for life and instituted communist reforms that were eventually undone, but because the Supreme Court precedent isn't so easy to undo, today's socialists have an easier time of it.

    Sure I understand you support such scummery but any true American should be pissed off about it.

    If it wasn't for McCarthy throwing all those FDR commies out, we'd be in that position still today.

    Does anyone besides a troll have a comment?
     
  4. kk8

    kk8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    7,084
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    OH GOOD GOD! The progressive piece of (*)(*)(*)(*)s really have infiltrated every level of our government! Can we make it to 2012??
     
  5. liberalminority

    liberalminority Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    25,273
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the supreme court interpreted the wording in the best interests of the United States at the time and it still resounds today as it so should
     
  6. Ctrl

    Ctrl Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    25,745
    Likes Received:
    1,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When?
    10char
     
  7. Dr. Righteous

    Dr. Righteous Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    10,545
    Likes Received:
    213
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    "regulate" in those times meant "to make regular". The founders did NOT want the government controlling interstate commerce. They wanted the federal government to enable regular commerce between the states. THATS IT. The left wing interpretation of the colonial definition of "regular" has gotten us in a whole load of mess that we are in today.
     
  8. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The DoC has to be abolished.
     
  9. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As much as I appreciate your viewpoint, I beleive that judges who have been trained for years in Constitutional scholarship have a bit more claim to define what "to regulate" means than you do. I am not arguing over the definition of what "regulation" in the Constitution means.

    This is about falling back on a decision pass in the 1940's during this nation's time of crisis and brush with Marxism that almost resulted in us becoming a communist dictatorship under FDR and his unethical threatening of Supreme Court justices that forced them to make such decisions that told an honest and free American he had no choice but to buy wheat on the open market or starve to death.

    That is tyranny, plain and simple, and that tyranny is a direct result of FDR, and that tyranny led to McCarthyism, which eliminated much of FDR's carefully laid plans after his death(thank god) but there are still vestiges of his tyranny that are being abused today.

    We have to figure out a way to make a clean break with that socialist tradition and right now the only people who can do that are the United States Supreme Court. Our freedom lies in their hands, as the Founding Father's intended them to be the last line of defense of Freedom.

    Let us hope they don't (*)(*)(*)(*) it up.
     
  10. Swamp_Music

    Swamp_Music Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,477
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    48
    The Constitution means what the FOUNDERS said it means. No court can change or amend the Constitution by judicial review. The Leftists are bringing the United States to the verge of another Civil War. Secession is after all LEGAL under the Constitution since Jefferson Davis could not be charged with treason, really anything at all AFTER the Civil War, and the shooting war started AFTER the Northern Army refused to vacate Southern Forts they had no right to occupy after Secession.

    Read up on the Commerce Clause, and its true meaning.


    http://www.bu.edu/rbarnett/Original.htm#II
     
  11. Swamp_Music

    Swamp_Music Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2010
    Messages:
    3,477
    Likes Received:
    57
    Trophy Points:
    48

    Legal Dictionary
    Main Entry: in·ter·pret Pronunciation: in-'t&r-pr&t Function: transitive verb:to explain or tell the meaning of (as a document) esp. in order to determine intent interpretthe provisions of the Constitution —L. H. Tribe>

    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/interpret
    No court can change the meaning of the Constitution. They must explain THE meaning of the Constitution, or they are not "interpreting" the Constitution, but AMENDING the Constitution by judicial review, which is illegal, and an impeachable offence. :omfg:
     
  12. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Dittos!!!!
     
  13. kk8

    kk8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    7,084
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dittos....wrong too. Good job.
     

Share This Page