Continuation for Question for 10 Aces

Discussion in '9/11' started by candycorn, Dec 4, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You wrote No

    Quote:
    You wrote No


    So you agree that the passengers died in a plane crash at the site where the planes crashed obviously?

    Please describe in your conspiratorial scenario, the steps in the chain of custody from the time the passengers boarded the planes to the point where the remains were returned to the families.

    Amazingly, you guys always complain that nobody listens to you....yet when you're given a forum to set us all straight, you promise so much yet deliver so little.
     
  2. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not trying to butt in. I just want to contribute some plausible theories on the passengers.

    http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/theories.html#1
    (excerpt)
    ------------------------------------------
    Several theories as to what could have happened to Flight 77 are:

    1. It was flown either by a conspirator on the plane, or via remote control to a military base (perhaps a secret base) or other remote location.

    2. It was flown via remote control and crashed out at sea.

    3. It was flown via remote control and crashed in some remote spot inland like Flight 93 reportedly was.

    If Flight 77 was crashed somewhere with all the passengers on board, then it's obvious everyone perished in the crash along with the plane. If Flight 77 was flown to a secret location, then the innocent passengers or all of the passengers could have been murdered there. It's also been theorized that the passengers could have been gassed while the plane was still in the air.

    Some theorize that Flight 77 was taken to a remote location where the conspirator passengers, if any, were taken off the plane and then Flight 77 with the innocent passengers was flown via remote control somewhere else and crashed or that the innocent passengers where boarded on another 9/11 hijacked plane who rendezvoused at the same point (such as Flight 93 which had 194 empty seats on its flight) and then was flown via remote control and crashed it somewhere else.
    ------------------------------------------

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_q6j6BZkHQ
    (32:00 time mark)

    http://letsrollforums.com/barbara-olson-9-11-t20525.html?
    http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/passengers.html
    http://www.rense.com/general68/doomed.htm
     
  3. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Man I'm glad you're on the other side of this argument. 10 Aces....would you like to go to bat for Scott on this one?
     
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We already know that the government planned and carried out the atacks.
    http://able2know.org/topic/177268-1#post-4782975

    There are several plausible scenarios as to what happened to the passengers. Our not knowing which scenario is the correct one doesn't detract from the proof of an inside job. All we can do is speculate on the passengers for now. It will all probably come to light eventually.
     
  5. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So basically, you have nothing more to say then, right?
     
  6. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is a lot of clear evidence of an inside job. We still don't know all the details of the plan such as what happened to the passengers. Years from now the people who planned and carried out the attacks may be put on trial. Some of them may talk and explain what happened. I don't see how else we can find out what they did.

    One plausible scenario is that the planes landed at military bases and the passengers and crew were gassed while still on the planes. Then, their bodies were put into buildings with bombs and the bombs were exploded. Then, they had the bodies which could be sent to morgues and the DNA tests would show the bodies were really those of the passengers.
     
  7. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The 19 hijackers are dead. Most of the planners are dead or are in prison.

    Really?

    Okay, so the cabins of the planes were filled with gas...another bizarre scenario that you've come up with.

    Or were they gassed individually? How do you explain the phone calls then? Oh wait, let me guess, they were faked, right?

    So now you not only have a platoon of people on the ground in Virginia planting light poles that need not be part of any scheme, you have people on planes gassing passengers.

    BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!!!​


    If you order today, Scott will throw in another group of people to fake phone calls. I think 10 and suede should probably call you out for doing more to hurt the movement than anyone else ever has done.

    :omg:

    The only word is "wow".
     
  8. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
  9. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  10. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The only thing proven to be true is that 19 men from the middle east hijacked 4 planes, crashed them into 3 buildings and 1 field in Pennsylvania.
     
  11. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    These pro-official version people know that almost none of the viewers are falling for their attempts to obfuscate the proof of an inside job so they try to outpost the truthers to make the posts with the evidence harder to come across. We have to make a few posts with some of the clearest evidence on the first pages of threads to thwart them. If there's some clear evidence on the first page of most threads, their success rate will be close to zero.
     
  12. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Funniest post ever.
     
  13. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Funny there seems to be a LOT of evidence missing for that one! As in most of the plane. :-D
     
  14. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Sounds like a great plan.

    Now all you need to do is find some clear evidence.

    http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4#p/u/9/xkivdEGph9A
     
  15. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Funny, that little video posts that the FBI claims "95%" of the plane was recovered, but the accumulation of footage of the debris shows otherwise!

    Maybe you can ask that Owens guy to make another little video trying to debunk that nothing was really buried in Shanksville!
     
  16. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Thats another thing that always didn't make sense to me; the twoofers all, every one of them, say that the crashes don't look anything like they are "supposed" to look. The reason for that is that in most plane crashes, the pilots want to live and are doing whatever they can to slow the plane down and not ram it into something.

    But lets pretend that the government is behind something, wouldn't you want it to look like every other plane crash in that case?

    Anyway, there was plenty of plane parts, body fragments, evidence, air traffic control tracking, etc...
     
  17. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So your contention is that if it's not on YouTube, it didn't happen now?
     
  18. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Where does it show that?

    I thought YouTube videos were freakin" GOSPEL for you truthers. That's all I seem to get from you guys in the way of "proof". That and kook blogs, forum posts, and horse manure sites like killtown.

    The difference of course is that the Owens guy actually cites some verifiable sources in several of his videos instead of relying on quotes taken out of context and the like.
     
  19. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That one reads like satire, it's so ludicrous. Right up there with web fairy and Dr. Judy.
     
  20. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I'd like to ask 10aces this question as well.

    In this thread that was closed, candycorn stated that

    to which 10aces responded

    I asked 10aces this.

    to which he responded.

    I don't, but I'm not sure what that has to do with my original question.

    So I'll ask again.

    10aces, who in your view should have controlled the investigation?
     
  21. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0


    What part of the government don't you trust, or should I say who in the gov don't you trust?
     
  22. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  23. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0

    No, you need to answer the question.

    You're the one who has a problem with the scenario that is layed out in the 9/11 Commission Report. Therefore it is incumbent upon you to provide the alternate course of events.

    That could be because you will not lay your your course of events.

    You have to speak to be heard.

    PS: This ain't Twitter. Feel free to make a point once in a while.
     
  24. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You didn't answer my question, which was . . .

    And who in your view should have controlled the investigation?

    Just answer the question instead of dancing around it.
     
  25. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, I don't agree.
     

Share This Page