Obama, Gingrich, Romney - progressive crony capitalists

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by NetworkCitizen, Dec 22, 2011.

  1. NetworkCitizen

    NetworkCitizen New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    5,477
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Two Rockefeller Republicans and Obama, with one hand dealing collectivism and the other holding the hands of bankers and corporations. What a disgrace.

    If you want more of the same, make sure one of these three are elected. Competition is a sin.
     
  2. thediplomat2.0

    thediplomat2.0 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    9,305
    Likes Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Actually, all three are at the hands of bankers and corporations.

    Furthermore, all the Presidential candidates (including Ron Paul), and the President are corrupt.

    Money=Power=Corrupt Politics. Any politician that receives money from a corporation is corrupt.
     
  3. Serfin' USA

    Serfin' USA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Messages:
    24,183
    Likes Received:
    551
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I wouldn't say Paul is corrupt, but he is extremely idealistic.
     
  4. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    We need an amendment to the Constitution. (Get money out of politics.)

    The corporate voice is not generally (representative of) the voice of the American PEOPLE.
     
  5. thediplomat2.0

    thediplomat2.0 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    9,305
    Likes Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Money=Power=Corruption.

    Ron Paul has nearly $13 million worth of corruption.
     
  6. thediplomat2.0

    thediplomat2.0 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    9,305
    Likes Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Along with Unions, PAC's, Super PAC's, and other lobbyist groups. The only people that should be contributing to political campaigns are individual Americans, and they should be limited to $100 donations. The only people adviocating for certain policies should be individual Americans. The United States is all about external individual political efficacy, not external collective political efficacy.
     
  7. NetworkCitizen

    NetworkCitizen New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2011
    Messages:
    5,477
    Likes Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I know that all three are at the hands of bankers and corporations. Romney and Gingrich are establishment GOPers, so that's a given.

    I don't even think it all comes down to campaign funds. It's an ideology of these people who think they should rule the population with a team of big government and top corporations...technocracy if you will. They are anti-populist.

    Gingrich isn't getting the big donations but if you read about third wave futurism, which he said describes his ideology, then you find that it suggests this exact idea...rule by international corporations/bureaucrats while dissolving national sovereignty.
     
  8. MnBillyBoy

    MnBillyBoy New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    2,896
    Likes Received:
    67
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Except when the benefits to military veterans program was running low in Mass.Romney took $60,000 from his own budget to prevent a default.

    Some use this garbage for personal gain..others use it for America's benefit.

    http://www.aboutmittromney.com/healthcare.htm#Results

    “In a November 3, 2006 press release, Romney stated that the account that funds the insurance benefits created in the "Welcome Home Bill" faced a deficit of $64,000. The Massachusetts legislature was out of session at the time of the shortfall. According to the press release, Romney transferred money from the governor's office budget to cover the deficit."

    End

    Maybe all these so called sleaze balls are not the same .
     

Share This Page