So will the more Green Friendly Keystone Pipeline happen

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Gator Monroe, Dec 23, 2011.

  1. Gator Monroe

    Gator Monroe Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,685
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I'm confused (Again ) Did the House get it into a Bill or not ?
     
  2. LeoKay

    LeoKay New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2011
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The bill requires Obama to make a decision on the pipeline within 60 days.
     
  3. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It needs more study.. the only information so far comes from claims made by Transcanada.
     
  4. P. Lotor

    P. Lotor Banned Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    6,700
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How much of the pipeline goes through fed land?
     
  5. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Look at the route... most of it is on private property... and that is who are complaining.
     
  6. P. Lotor

    P. Lotor Banned Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    6,700
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well if property owners don't want a pipeline then it shouldn't happen on their land.
     
  7. Gator Monroe

    Gator Monroe Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    5,685
    Likes Received:
    155
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Tell that to PG&E & Caltrans
     
  8. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The government has no prob running people outa there homes to build a shopping mall because of the tax revenue the mall will generate. I believe they are just trying to keep the price of energy high to continue to choke the American people outa every dime they can.
     
  9. P. Lotor

    P. Lotor Banned Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2010
    Messages:
    6,700
    Likes Received:
    55
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Tell it to kelo
     
  10. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh you are talking about a "taking".. See Lucas versus the South Carolina Coastal Council... He won in the US Supreme Court and it only cost him 4 million dollars.
     
  11. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,243
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I was making the point that the government doesn't have the interest of the people in mind. High energy prices is good for socialism. With a limited energy supply, the Czars of energy get to decide who gets energy and who doesn't. If the supply of energy was increased, people become more free to pursue there interest. I plugged in an electric heater and my energy bill went threw the roof. I can't even imagine plugging a car into the wall. The left blocks the very progress they claim to be for. More energy for all is better then rationing a limited supply to those who can afford it.
     
  12. FearandLoathing

    FearandLoathing Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    4,463
    Likes Received:
    520
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You also claimed categorically that Keystone would only create 3,000 jobs and, among a host of other false claims, that it would only deliver 100 bbls a day.

    There is a huge credibility gap.

    The US will ask that Keystone proceed after the 2012 elections. The halt Owebama ordered had nothing to do with the environment but rather his campaign contributions...

    By then the industry will be rather tied up completing a pipeline to the Pacific coast to supply synthetic crude to China...
     
  13. Margot

    Margot Account closed, not banned

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    Messages:
    62,072
    Likes Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOLOL SUMED, TAPLINE and the East West Pipeline didn't create the job numbers that TransCanada is claiming..

    And...... you never heard of any of those pipleines.
     
  14. darckriver

    darckriver New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    7,773
    Likes Received:
    239
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bingo! High energy prices are the leverage with which Democrats hope to drive America towards their green energy interests. Environmentalists then continue their Party support and the brothers-in-law and Swiss bank accounts of Democrat Senators and Congressweasels make beaucoup bucks on their green investments. Low energy prices translates into big hindrances for the Green Scamming of America initiatives and worthless green firms failing and making greenie politicians/investors poorer rather than richer.
     

Share This Page