+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 79

Thread: Labour MP in racist anti-white Twitter post

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anders Hoveland View Post
    But what if we were not misreporting? What if it only seemed that way because you get virtually all of your information from CENSORED televission and newspapers? (not literally censored, but that is effectively what happens)

    The real comical views would be those found in the British media, if it was not so sad that most people actually believed it. When it comes to discussing anything that even remotely could relate to race, it is almost like something out of 1984. I wonder how many of the British even know that the London riots was almost certainly a race issue? But the media gave everyone a blatently warped view of what had happened. But Londoners that had seen the rioters with their own eyes must have suspected the truth.

    When most of the newspapers tell their readers the events had nothing to do with race/ethnicty and then selectively only show pictures that do not reveal that over 90% of the rioters were North African, that is unquestionably deception. Some of the papers began to get a little looser with the facts later, but only two months after the government had already reacted, and the event was fading into memory. Here is a typical picture, selected to intentionally avoid showing the rioters faces: http://dailymaverick.co.za/photo/res...-riots/618/408
    or this one, note that while the man in the center is white, ALL the other rioters in the background are not, but one has to look very carefully since they are all in the blurry background: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/...-riots-006.jpg Obviously this picture was intentionally taken to show the white man in the center. These types of selectively taken pictures are typical of the media bias. It is obvious that it is not just coincidental.
    And you get your information not from censored tv and papers, but from Stormfront and Jihad Watch?

    Tbh, the person who never tweeted anything stupid hasn't tweeted. It's been deleted, but looks like she might have been responding to a constituent and adapted her style to suit. No doubt she will learn the error of her ways, but she's been there for 25 years so she's a hardened campaigner.

    I am much more interested in Chuka Umunna. I've only seen him a few times, but he potentially could be the future.
    Last edited by Viv; Jan 05 2012 at 02:40 PM.

  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DinoDino View Post
    It was quickly removed, but it demonstrates once again how much the Marxist Labor party scum hate the British people, and white people in general. If anyone said something like this against non-whites they'd be in court on a jumped-up race-hate charge!

    Nope........it just shows how the UK majority doesn't like minorities telling them what they are like.

    I'm a white UK citizen......and I have no quibble with Diane Abbot's tweet at all.........why do you have a problem with it? The truth, after all, is the truth........you are the kind of person who proves she is correct.
    NEWSNET SCOTLAND..doesn't adhere to the Unionist view
    YOUR SCOTLAND. YOUR REFERENDUM
    Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right. Martin Luther King Jr.
    "BE NICE TO AMERICA OR WE'LL BRING DEMOCRACY TO YOUR COUNTRY"....a US bumper-sticker warning!

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DinoDino View Post
    Like all hypocrite left-wing scum she complains about racism but she'd send white people to the gas chambers!! This woman should be ashamed of herself, fat stupid dolt! Labor is now the face of anti-white Nazism in the UK.
    And you come to that conclusion how, exactly? Would that be because you would quite happily send all non-white Anglo-Saxon people with less that a few hundred years of unbroken British ancestry there?

    There is no anti-White Nazism..and I wish I could say the same about anti-anything-but-white nazism...as epitomised on here by yourself.
    NEWSNET SCOTLAND..doesn't adhere to the Unionist view
    YOUR SCOTLAND. YOUR REFERENDUM
    Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right. Martin Luther King Jr.
    "BE NICE TO AMERICA OR WE'LL BRING DEMOCRACY TO YOUR COUNTRY"....a US bumper-sticker warning!

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anders Hoveland View Post
    There is plenty of racism coming from multiculturalists in the USA, UK, and Sweden. They have essentially taken over the state of California, and racially discriminate against whites (and especially Asians!) in enrollments into the state public universities. President Obama ("the champion against discrimination") gave a speech to a hispanic organization founded by an undisputed anti-white racist. The court system and police routinely discriminate against native swedes when enforcing anti-dicrimination laws and safety codes.

    Most of the rallying against racism coming from multiculturalists is completely hypocritical. They are just trying to guilt everyone else into complacency.

    As for public televission in the UK, I do not know where to begin. When it comes to the issue of race, the tax-payer funded propaganda is completely one sided. It is not merely an issue of avoiding offending anyone or of discussing race. Rather it is partisan political support, blatent deception, and even lies. Some in the government unabashedly want to go so far as to discriminate based on political/social beliefs for public sector jobs!

    I can at least respect multiculturalists acting only out of pure ideology, even if I think they are wrong. But all too many of them are willing to resort to whatever tactics they think might be effective, with little regard for the truth or ethical principles.
    Nah....you have your references completely screwed up.......it is the likes of the BNP who act out of pure racism and ideology and are willing to resort to whatever tactics they think might be effective, with little regard for the truth or ethical principles.

    Happy to correct your misapprehensions!
    NEWSNET SCOTLAND..doesn't adhere to the Unionist view
    YOUR SCOTLAND. YOUR REFERENDUM
    Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right. Martin Luther King Jr.
    "BE NICE TO AMERICA OR WE'LL BRING DEMOCRACY TO YOUR COUNTRY"....a US bumper-sticker warning!

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Anders Hoveland View Post
    But what if we were not misreporting? What if it only seemed that way because you get virtually all of your information from CENSORED televission and newspapers? (not literally censored, but that is effectively what happens)

    The real comical views would be those found in the British media, if it was not so sad that most people actually believed it. When it comes to discussing anything that even remotely could relate to race, it is almost like something out of 1984. I wonder how many of the British even know that the London riots was almost certainly a race issue? But the media gave everyone a blatently warped view of what had happened. But Londoners that had seen the rioters with their own eyes must have suspected the truth.

    When most of the newspapers tell their readers the events had nothing to do with race/ethnicty and then selectively only show pictures that do not reveal that over 90% of the rioters were North African, that is unquestionably deception. Some of the papers began to get a little looser with the facts later, but only two months after the government had already reacted, and the event was fading into memory. Here is a typical picture, selected to intentionally avoid showing the rioters faces: http://dailymaverick.co.za/photo/res...-riots/618/408
    or this one, note that while the man in the center is white, ALL the other rioters in the background are not, but one has to look very carefully since they are all in the blurry background: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/...-riots-006.jpg Obviously this picture was intentionally taken to show the white man in the center. These types of selectively taken pictures are typical of the media bias. It is obvious that it is not just coincidental.
    But you are misrepresenting.......any of us could dig out photos and articles which give the lie to your ones.....but why bother because closed minds are not reachable even with a general anaesthetic and a scalpel, because there is nothing there but empty space.
    NEWSNET SCOTLAND..doesn't adhere to the Unionist view
    YOUR SCOTLAND. YOUR REFERENDUM
    Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right. Martin Luther King Jr.
    "BE NICE TO AMERICA OR WE'LL BRING DEMOCRACY TO YOUR COUNTRY"....a US bumper-sticker warning!

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Plymouth View Post
    I just saw that woman somewhere, Russia Today I think, blabbering on about how the London police were institutionally racist, all the while spitting out an affected, patronizing "baby-talk" accent through sneering lips.

    Caucasians are getting rather tired of this, I am here to say. Sooner or later the giggles blacks are having with all their prodding and sniping at white people are going to turn around and bite them in the ass. As another poster said, we here in California have had this garbage shoved down our throats for decades now; California pioneered reverse racism. (I'm about at my wit's end with all the Mexicans in my town parading flags up and down the streets and demanding that I speak their language, because we gringos stole "their rightful land..." and with the politicians agreeing with them! What an utter crock; I do feel for the Palestinians!) People like that woman have done more to damage race relations than any mainstream person of European descent in recent memory.

    <10 chars>
    NEWSNET SCOTLAND..doesn't adhere to the Unionist view
    YOUR SCOTLAND. YOUR REFERENDUM
    Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right. Martin Luther King Jr.
    "BE NICE TO AMERICA OR WE'LL BRING DEMOCRACY TO YOUR COUNTRY"....a US bumper-sticker warning!

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Polar Bear View Post


    First black conservative Parliament member is now a British felon after 12 months in the slammer.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-15681073
    Then he's upsides with the plethora of white parliamentary felons who are or have been in jail here.

    Want a list of them?
    NEWSNET SCOTLAND..doesn't adhere to the Unionist view
    YOUR SCOTLAND. YOUR REFERENDUM
    Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right. Martin Luther King Jr.
    "BE NICE TO AMERICA OR WE'LL BRING DEMOCRACY TO YOUR COUNTRY"....a US bumper-sticker warning!

  8. #18
    england us georgia
    Location: Brighton , UK
    Posts: 4,298
    Blog Entries: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Polar Bear View Post
    [IMG]

    First black conservative Parliament member is now a British felon after 12 months in the slammer.

    ]
    Unless you are telling us that secretly you fancy him , what point are you trying to make?
    Did you imagine that only white people get greedy and make bad decisions ?

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Oddquine View Post

    <10 chars>
    How very insightful.
    "Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body -- it calls attention to an unhealthy state of things."
    -Sir Winston Churchill

  10. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Plymouth View Post
    I just saw that woman somewhere, Russia Today I think, blabbering on about how the London police were institutionally racist, all the while spitting out an affected, patronizing "baby-talk" accent through sneering lips.
    The Police were found to have been institutionally racist for their handling of the Stephen Lawrence case and that case has just been retried and the people convicted. If you are referring to Diane Abbot, she's maybe just accurately relating the findings of the inquiry on that case, it's all over the news here.

    Caucasians are getting rather tired of this, I am here to say. Sooner or later the giggles blacks are having with all their prodding and sniping at white people are going to turn around and bite them in the ass. As another poster said, we here in California have had this garbage shoved down our throats for decades now; California pioneered reverse racism. (I'm about at my wit's end with all the Mexicans in my town parading flags up and down the streets and demanding that I speak their language, because we gringos stole "their rightful land..." and with the politicians agreeing with them! What an utter crock; I do feel for the Palestinians!) People like that woman have done more to damage race relations than any mainstream person of European descent in recent memory.
    I think it's at a dangerous, potentially volatile stage at the moment and could go either way. Non-whites are gaining some equality at last, but they are still having to fight for it as the Lawrence case showed. The summer riots here arose from a racial incident with the Police. Whether the Police did anything wrong is debatable, but the initial protest stemmed from their handling of the incident where a man died at the hands of the Police.

    I support equality and there is still a long way to go, but hope it is well managed and that the reactionary problems you suggest but which I haven't really seen here yet...don't in fact arise.

    I think they are unlikely to arise, as the reaction to Diane Abbot's twittery demonstrate people are vigilant and won't accept racism in any direction, anti-white included.
    Last edited by Viv; Jan 06 2012 at 10:34 AM.

+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks