Incorrect Bowerbird; this may indeed be so for the few very hot countries, for the majority, solar panels are not cost effective at all.
The reason why many governments offer subsidies is because of the high cost of installation. Offering subsidies was the only way to get householders and companies to install them. Solar panels have been demonstrated to be one of the least cost effective methods of combating climate change.
I see; as long as he's turning it into a guest house it's fine; you completely fail to see what I'm referring to here. Stop making ridiculous excuses to justify the fact that those who dictate to the rest of us how we must change our lifestyles and behaviours have absolutely no intention of making the same sacrifices themselves. The argument being used in this respect is pathetic.
Do your own research. Are you seriously implying that the HadCRUT3 data set has not crucially underpinned the IPCC assessment reports and other crucial scientific studies?
Ok, lets debate the 'science'. Demonstrate to me inequivicably that modern Climate Change is anthrpogenic in nature, using only science.
Beats me how exactly you are going to do this. If you are indeed projecting your unshakable insistance upon others based on scientific data alone, you should agree that scientific method relies on repeatable observational data?
The thread asks a question regarding observational data; in that the scientists who are responsible for seriously influencing much of the policy making in place today, have grudgingly admitted that since approx: 1996/7 there has been no discernable warming.
If you; and other anthropogenic CC advocates genuinely believe in the wisdom of scientific method, you would also agree that solar activity has to be fully investigated before any scientific body can state that anything is fact, rather than belief. You already stated that "yes, man is responsible" and yet you are wholly unable to demonstrate it; that's ridiculous.
There is a huge elephant in the room, the elephant being that observational data has demonstrated that whilst the Earth was warming so were other planets, this trend cannot continue to be ignored.
Now that here on Earth we have seen a cooling effect over the last one and a half decades, observational data trends of other planets and whether they are also cooling is imperative.
By the way; at no point during our conversations have you so much as attempted to debate the science; sorry but your brightly coloured pictorial just doesn't do it for me.
As for skeptic sites being full of lies and cherry picking; I wouldn't know I don't visit them. Regarding links; what do you want me to do, put up worthless pictorials like yourself, because they look impressive but tell you nothing, or perhaps give you links to sites you have already deemed full of lies and cherry pickers?
You might want to start with the Danish Meteorological Institute; and maybe some of the work carried out by Friis Christensen and Lassen.