Victims Of Uranium Munitions Used By The Us Forces In Afghanistan

Discussion in 'Terrorism' started by afghani, Feb 5, 2012.

  1. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    VICTIMS OF URANIUM MUNITIONS USED BY THE US FORCES IN AFGHANISTAN

    [​IMG]


    Afghanistan has become the disaster words could not describe, hence, I decided to illustrate this disaster via these photos of babies born deformed.

    On many occasions, I pointed out that we need funds to build a research institute and the linked monitoring stations. Unfortunately, majority of you simply brushed off my request. I wonder if these photos could make you think.

    Again, it is up to you, to do whatever you think is humane; however, it should not be too difficult. The funds for the research institute are very small price you have to pay after all your tax dollars–though you are not in control of– have nonetheless created this disaster. If everyone visiting this web site pays the amount they spend on soft drinks in a month, we would have the funds to build our research facility:


    [​IMG]



    AMERICAN DEMOCRACY IN ACTION—”FREEDOM IS ON THE MOVE” RIGHT? The GOVERNMENT of this COUNTRY IS CRIMINAL. I HOPE YOU ARE NOT INDIFFERENT AND IRRESPONSIBLE!!


    [​IMG]

    YOU MIGHT SAY, “THAT’S LIFE WHAT COULD I DO” CONTRIBUTE TO BUILD A RESEARCH FACILITY

    [​IMG]


    PAINFUL REMINDER OF THE GENOCIDE COMMITTED BY THE US GOVERNMENT
     
  2. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]


    The Gift that Keeps on giving: Uranium munitions



    [​IMG]



    This child’s family also had hopes


    [​IMG]



    The painful reminder of Democracy Made in America


    [​IMG]



    Imagine what would the parents of this child think about the US and the people here?
     
  3. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]


    HOW WOULD YOU FEEL IF YOUR CHILDREN WERE BORN LIKE THIS?


    [​IMG]


    Painful, IS IT NOT?


    [​IMG]


    AND


    [​IMG]


    HERE YOU GO AGAIN, MORE VICTIMS OF URANIUM MUNITIONS–DEMOCRACY AMERICAN STYLE,
     
  4. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]

    and more,

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    This child does not look like a child

    [​IMG]


    ANOTHER PAINFUL REMINDER OF “DEMOCRACY” AMERICAN STYLE
     
  5. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    NO ONE WANTS THEIR CHILD TO LOOK LIKE THIS


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    LIBERATING WOMEN? SHE STILL WEARS BURQA BUT HER CHILDREN WILL NOT GROW TO SEE THEIR MOTHER AND FATHER
     
  6. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    America should have nuked Afghan cities after 9/11 instead of invading the country. All the lives of the people of Afghanistan aren't worth one drop of American blood.
     
  7. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    [​IMG]


    BODILY ORGANS OUTSIDE THE BODY


    [​IMG]


    DEFORMED GENITALIA


    [​IMG]



    child born with one eye



    OUR CHILDREN WOULD BE BORN THIS WAY FOR EVER THANKS TO THE URANIUM MUNITIONS USED BY YOUR ARMED FORCES PAID FOR BY YOUR TAX DOLLARS.OH A FEW MINOR DETAILS ABOUT SITUATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN:

    URANIUM MUNITIONS

    Due to the use of massive amount of uranium munitions used by the US forces in the initial bombing and subsequently, massive amount of congenital deformities occur all over Afghanistan. The rate of various cancers has gone up significantly. Leukemia and esophageal cancers are very high among children. According to doctors at maternity and children hospitals in Kabul, the rate of various congenital deformities have increased by many folds since the US invasion. In fact, the magnitude of man made isotopes was

    established by the Uranium Medical Research Center after their investigators made to trips to Afghanistan and collected urine and soil samples. They established that the rate of man made isotopes was gone up 2000 times in some subjects located near the bombed areas.

    Since uranium used in the weapons have a half-life of 4.5 billion years, the US forces ensured that generations of Afghans suffer from cancers and deformities. This is certainly not development. In fact, it is the biggest crime ever committed by anyone in the history of humanity.

    For those of you that argued in favor of the invasion of Afghanistan, the following article by investigative reporter Ed Haas of the Muckraker Report published the following:
    http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html
    FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11″
    June 6, 2006 – This past weekend, a thought provoking e-mail circulated through Internet news groups, and was sent to the Muckraker Report by Mr. Paul V. Sheridan (Winner of the 2005 Civil Justice Foundation Award), bringing attention to the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorist web page for Usama Bin Laden.[1] (See bottom of this web page for Most Wanted page) In the e-mail, the question is asked, “Why doesn’t Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster make any direct connection with the events of September 11, 2001?” The FBI says on its Bin Laden web page that Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. According to the FBI, these attacks killed over 200 people. The FBI concludes its reason for “wanting” Bin Laden by saying, “In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorists attacks throughout the world.”

    On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000 , to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

    Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, “How this was possible?” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” I asked, “How does that work?” Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”

    It shouldn’t take long before the full meaning of these FBI statements start to prick your brain and raise your blood pressure. If you think the way I think, in quick order you will be wrestling with a barrage of very powerful questions that must be answered. First and foremost, if the U.S. government does not have enough hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan to “smoke him out of his cave?” The federal government claims to have invaded Afghanistan to “root out” Bin Laden and the Taliban. Through the talking heads in the mainstream media, the Bush Administration told the American people that Usama Bin Laden was Public Enemy Number One and responsible for the deaths of nearly 3000 people on September 11, 2001. Yet nearly five years later, the FBI says that it has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

    Next is the Bin Laden “confession” video that was released by the U.S. government on December 13, 2001. Most Americans remember this video. It was the video showing Bin Laden with a few of his comrades recounting with delight the September 11 terrorist attacks against the United States. The Department of Defense issued a press release to accompany this video in which Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld said, “There was no doubt of bin Laden’s responsibility for the September 11 attacks before the tape was discovered.”[2] What Rumsfeld implied by his statement was that Bin Laden was the known mastermind behind 9/11 even before the “confession video” and that the video simply served to confirm what the U.S. government already knew; that Bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

    In a BBC News article[3] reporting on the “9/11 confession video” release, President Bush is said to have been hesitant to release the tape because he knew it would be a vivid reminder to many people of their loss. But, he also knew it would be “a devastating declaration” of Bin Laden’s guilt. “Were going to get him,” said President Bush. “Dead or alive, it doesn’t matter to me.”

    In a CNN article[4] regarding the Bin Laden tape, then New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that “the tape removes any doubt that the U.S. military campaign targeting bin Laden and his associates is more than justified.” Senator Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said, “The tape’s release is central to informing people in the outside world who don’t believe bin Laden was involved in the September 11 attacks.” Shelby went on to say “I don’t know how they can be in denial after they see this tape.” Well Senator Shelby, apparently the Federal Bureau of Investigation isn’t convinced by the taped confession, so why are you?

    The Muckraker Report attempted to secure a reference to the U.S. government authenticating the Bin Laden “confession video”, to no avail. However, it is conclusive that the Bush Administration and U.S. Congress, along with the dead stream media, played the video as if it was authentic. So why doesn’t the FBI view the “confession video” as hard evidence? After all, if the FBI is investigating a crime such as drug trafficking, and it discovers a video of members of a drug cartel opening talking about a successful distribution operation in the United States, that video would be presented to a federal grand jury. The identified participants of the video would be indicted, and if captured, the video alone would serve as sufficient evidence to net a conviction in a federal court. So why is the Bin Laden “confession video” not carrying the same weight with the FBI?

    Remember, on June 5, 2006, FBI spokesman, Chief of Investigative Publicity Rex Tomb said, “The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” This should be headline news worldwide. The challenge to the reader is to find out why it is not. Why has the U.S. media blindly read the government-provided 9/11 scripts, rather than investigate without passion, prejudice, or bias, the events of September 11, 2001? Why has the U.S. media blacklisted any guest that might speak of a government sponsored 9/11 cover-up, rather than seeking out those people who have something to say about 9/11 that is contrary to the government’s account? And on those few rare occasions when a 9/11 dissenter has made it upon the airways, why has the mainstream media ridiculed the guest as a conspiracy nut, rather than listen to the evidence that clearly raises valid questions about the government’s 9/11 account? Why is the Big Media Conglomeration blindly content with the government’s 9/11 story when so much verifiable information to the contrary is available with a few clicks of a computer mouse?

    Who is it that is controlling the media message, and how is it that the U.S. media has indicted Usama Bin Laden for the events of September 11, 2001, but the U.S. government has not? How is it that the FBI has no “hard evidence” connecting Usama Bin Laden to the events of September 11, 2001, while the U.S. media has played the Bin Laden - 9/11 connection story for five years now as if it has conclusive evidence that Bin Laden is responsible for the collapse of the twin towers, the Pentagon attack, and the demise of United Flight 93?

    …No hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11… Think about it.
     
  8. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    URANIUM MUNITIONS

    Due to the use of massive amount of uranium munitions used by the US forces in the initial bombing and subsequently, massive amount of congenital deformities occur all over Afghanistan. The rate of various cancers has gone up significantly. Leukemia and esophageal cancers are very high among children. According to doctors at maternity and children hospitals in Kabul, the rate of various congenital deformities have increased by many folds since the US invasion. In fact, the magnitude of man made isotopes was

    established by the Uranium Medical Research Center after their investigators made to trips to Afghanistan and collected urine and soil samples. They established that the rate of man made isotopes was gone up 2000 times in some subjects located near the bombed areas.

    Since uranium used in the weapons have a half-life of 4.5 billion years, the US forces ensured that generations of Afghans suffer from cancers and deformities. This is certainly not development. In fact, it is the biggest crime ever committed by anyone in the history of humanity.

    For those of you that argued in favor of the invasion of Afghanistan, the following article by investigative reporter Ed Haas of the Muckraker Report published the following:
    http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html
    FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11″
    June 6, 2006 – This past weekend, a thought provoking e-mail circulated through Internet news groups, and was sent to the Muckraker Report by Mr. Paul V. Sheridan (Winner of the 2005 Civil Justice Foundation Award), bringing attention to the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorist web page for Usama Bin Laden.[1] (See bottom of this web page for Most Wanted page) In the e-mail, the question is asked, “Why doesn’t Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster make any direct connection with the events of September 11, 2001?” The FBI says on its Bin Laden web page that Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. According to the FBI, these attacks killed over 200 people. The FBI concludes its reason for “wanting” Bin Laden by saying, “In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorists attacks throughout the world.”

    On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters, (202) 324-3000 , to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. The Muckraker Report spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Laden’s Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

    Surprised by the ease in which this FBI spokesman made such an astonishing statement, I asked, “How this was possible?” Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11.” I asked, “How does that work?” Tomb continued, “The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”

    It shouldn’t take long before the full meaning of these FBI statements start to prick your brain and raise your blood pressure. If you think the way I think, in quick order you will be wrestling with a barrage of very powerful questions that must be answered. First and foremost, if the U.S. government does not have enough hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possible that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan to “smoke him out of his cave?” The federal government claims to have invaded Afghanistan to “root out” Bin Laden and the Taliban. Through the talking heads in the mainstream media, the Bush Administration told the American people that Usama Bin Laden was Public Enemy Number One and responsible for the deaths of nearly 3000 people on September 11, 2001. Yet nearly five years later, the FBI says that it has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

    Next is the Bin Laden “confession” video that was released by the U.S. government on December 13, 2001. Most Americans remember this video. It was the video showing Bin Laden with a few of his comrades recounting with delight the September 11 terrorist attacks against the United States. The Department of Defense issued a press release to accompany this video in which Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld said, “There was no doubt of bin Laden’s responsibility for the September 11 attacks before the tape was discovered.”[2] What Rumsfeld implied by his statement was that Bin Laden was the known mastermind behind 9/11 even before the “confession video” and that the video simply served to confirm what the U.S. government already knew; that Bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

    In a BBC News article[3] reporting on the “9/11 confession video” release, President Bush is said to have been hesitant to release the tape because he knew it would be a vivid reminder to many people of their loss. But, he also knew it would be “a devastating declaration” of Bin Laden’s guilt. “Were going to get him,” said President Bush. “Dead or alive, it doesn’t matter to me.”

    In a CNN article[4] regarding the Bin Laden tape, then New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that “the tape removes any doubt that the U.S. military campaign targeting bin Laden and his associates is more than justified.” Senator Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said, “The tape’s release is central to informing people in the outside world who don’t believe bin Laden was involved in the September 11 attacks.” Shelby went on to say “I don’t know how they can be in denial after they see this tape.” Well Senator Shelby, apparently the Federal Bureau of Investigation isn’t convinced by the taped confession, so why are you?

    The Muckraker Report attempted to secure a reference to the U.S. government authenticating the Bin Laden “confession video”, to no avail. However, it is conclusive that the Bush Administration and U.S. Congress, along with the dead stream media, played the video as if it was authentic. So why doesn’t the FBI view the “confession video” as hard evidence? After all, if the FBI is investigating a crime such as drug trafficking, and it discovers a video of members of a drug cartel opening talking about a successful distribution operation in the United States, that video would be presented to a federal grand jury. The identified participants of the video would be indicted, and if captured, the video alone would serve as sufficient evidence to net a conviction in a federal court. So why is the Bin Laden “confession video” not carrying the same weight with the FBI?

    Remember, on June 5, 2006, FBI spokesman, Chief of Investigative Publicity Rex Tomb said, “The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” This should be headline news worldwide. The challenge to the reader is to find out why it is not. Why has the U.S. media blindly read the government-provided 9/11 scripts, rather than investigate without passion, prejudice, or bias, the events of September 11, 2001? Why has the U.S. media blacklisted any guest that might speak of a government sponsored 9/11 cover-up, rather than seeking out those people who have something to say about 9/11 that is contrary to the government’s account? And on those few rare occasions when a 9/11 dissenter has made it upon the airways, why has the mainstream media ridiculed the guest as a conspiracy nut, rather than listen to the evidence that clearly raises valid questions about the government’s 9/11 account? Why is the Big Media Conglomeration blindly content with the government’s 9/11 story when so much verifiable information to the contrary is available with a few clicks of a computer mouse?

    Who is it that is controlling the media message, and how is it that the U.S. media has indicted Usama Bin Laden for the events of September 11, 2001, but the U.S. government has not? How is it that the FBI has no “hard evidence” connecting Usama Bin Laden to the events of September 11, 2001, while the U.S. media has played the Bin Laden - 9/11 connection story for five years now as if it has conclusive evidence that Bin Laden is responsible for the collapse of the twin towers, the Pentagon attack, and the demise of United Flight 93?

    …No hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11… Think about it.


    [1] Federal Bureau of Investigation, Most Wanted Terrorists, Usama Bin Laden, http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/terrorists/terbinladen.htm, [Accessed May 31, 2006]
    [2] United States Department of Defense, News Release, U.S. Releases Videotape of Osama bin Laden, December 13, 2001, http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2001/b12132001_bt630-01.html, [Accessed June 5, 2006]

    [3] BBC News, Bin Laden video angers New Yorkers, December 14, 2001, Peter Gould, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1711874.stm, [Accessed June 5, 2006]

    [4] CNN, Bin Laden on tape: Attacks ‘benefited Islam greatly”, December 14, 2001, http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/12/13/ret.bin.laden.videotape, [Accessed June 5, 2006]

    Article from:

    http://www.afghanistanafterdemocracy.com/page10.html
     
  9. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Pal, they're not Americans. No one gives a shxt.
     
  10. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The children are afghans but the bombs are Made in USA, bombed and fired by the US Army and Air force!!! These Bombs are made and finance with the help of US tax payers money and you says they're not Americans????

    Always accept the truth; these acts are done by the US army in afghanistan!
    there are also many brutal and inhuman and uncivilized acts i would be posting in this forum so watch and read the acts of your civilized army!!
     
  11. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Don't care about Afghan lives.
     
  12. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    you don't need to mention this We know the real Picture of Americans! that's why every third world country is against the american imperialist and that's why every afghan is against american military presence in afghanistan!!!

    This is what your human rights????????????
    Geneva rights????????????

    you give a Typical American answer!!!
     
  13. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A typical American would reach out to you. I'm not a typical American. I simply don't give a shxt about your people.
     
  14. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yeah! and then will be pleasing and excusing us in order to start another Qatar talking!!!!!!!!!

    you don't have a human heart rather than a materialist heart...
    if you was a human then definately your heart will burn!!!
     
  15. Message to Garcia

    Message to Garcia New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Propaganda is well, propaganda.
     
  16. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  17. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm a honey badger. Honey badger don't give a shxt.


    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r7wHMg5Yjg"]The Crazy Nastyass Honey Badger (original narration by Randall) - YouTube[/ame]
     
  18. Message to Garcia

    Message to Garcia New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "Special Forces and post-bombing, site inspection teams have been given radiation protection instructions, radiation detectors and protective equipment prior to and since entering Afghanistan."

    Funny. My friend is a Green Beret, and he showed me videos of air raids he was close enough to get graphic recordings of. Never did he show any pics of protective radiation equipment.

    "Everyday, US AC 130 gunships, A-10s and B 52s bomb Afghan villages and towns at each turn when a unit of US troops encounter resistance."

    So it would be fair to say that if any of this toxic uranium is true, we are unleashing it on our troops too then?
     
  19. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    your mind is so much closed by your propaganist media.
    According to UN, no one has the (*)(*)(*)(*)ed right to use cluster bombs everywhere, so how american troops come to use them?
    Using such bombs and urainium is not in interest of humanity and ethics...

    nor it does shows the superiority of american troops but their guilt and downness.....

    Every day, Afghan socide Bombers, road side bombs and Rockets are fired to every those unit which consists american troops.... and afghans will continue to do so till they are not gone from our land, which is the grave yard of super empires no one can win here!!!!
     
  20. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Afghanistan is the poorest, most backward country in the world. It's the land of primitive screwheads.
     
  21. Message to Garcia

    Message to Garcia New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think it's safe to say the Taliban make our cluster bombs look like raining ecstasy as far as human rights are concerned.

    I think the cowardliness is shown with the IEDs your countrymen have buried all over the place killing your own people in the process. It's also pretty cowardly to taunt the US soldiers with gunfire hiding behind women and children with a camera waiting for return fire, so they can use it as propaganda that the US is evil.

    IF the US was as evil and unscrupulous as you say we are, we would simply go from town to town and systematically kill each and everyone of you like the Russians were doing before we gave you weapons to stop their gunships. If we failed at anything, it was supporting Pakistan the whole time they were supplying and protecting the Taliban, (Pakistani ISI) to keep power over Afghans. In a nutshell, your country that is so invisible has already been conquered by Pakistan. We gave it back to you, but your countrymen are weak and will more than likely surrender to the Taliban yet again once we leave.
     
  22. Albert Di Salvo

    Albert Di Salvo New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    25,739
    Likes Received:
    684
    Trophy Points:
    0
  23. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    For us there is no difference between the Russian Army and The American uncivilized soldiers!!!
    Americans also bombed villages, wipe out villages from the earth crust.. and here you have seen how they have used uranium and cluster bombs to kill innocent civilians!!!

    Talibans never hide behind women and civilians..... they even don't shoot american women soldiers so how come they can hide behind their own womens... It is simply typical western propaganda!!!

    You said, PAkistan has already conquered our country??? and when the US leave they will attack???

    It is totally falsed predictions!! compare your this situation with your own situation... you fought war against British so you were not terrorists, your george washington was not a terroist!!! in fact you peoples received huge amount of aid from France and loyeee...... at that time why you peoples weren't thinking of that another european power will attack us??? the british should remain here in they will leave other will come... but no you peoples fight and for us, afghans, we will fight against every country, nation who will attack our country!!!

    Even afghans have fighted war against ottoman empire and defeated them, our hero was shah ashraf hotak!!!

    So pakistan which we have rulled them for the last thousand years can't have the guts nor the courage to rule and attack us... while talibans are our own peoples, it is due to western propaganda that you calles them army of ISI....

    See why some of afghan army soldiers are killing the french and american soldiers? because they can see there opprese and tyrant rule... that's why now and then they used to cut the heads of all those attacked their home land.....
     
  24. afghani

    afghani New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    35
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Afghanistan is the poorest then what the hill the americans are doing here-

    -in order to use those more than trillion dollars natural mines!!
    - in order to snatch world's less available resources (according to a research paper afghanistan has the world's largest mines of less available natural resources such as lithium etc which are used in machinery and computers etc....)

    - in order to pass a pipeline from here
    - which is the gate way to central asia

    Afghanistan is a poorly managed country but not a poor country it is the rich country but need the patriot afghans! who would reject the imperialist American rule!!!

    Americans are poor country which are depending on Oil on Middle East, On Gas on Central asia and Caspian sea, On cheap commodities on Made in China, On technology on Japan and INDIA!!!
    American are poors that's why they moved like beggars to collect something for their feedings..... and it is the truth!!!
     
  25. Message to Garcia

    Message to Garcia New Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0

Share This Page