View Poll Results: Were you an early supporter?

Voters
18. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, I voted for Obama

    5 27.78%
  • No, I voted for McCain

    7 38.89%
  • No, I didn't vote

    6 33.33%
+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Did you change your mind?

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woodystylez View Post
    Yes, I voted Obama. Because voting Republican would have been the worst decision this country would have ever seen. More war, higher gas prices, worse national debt due to more war+cut taxes.

    Obama saved our country. Show some respect. Next vote Ron Paul to save our debt crisis caused by Bush.
    Total deficits under Bush with a Republican Congress FY2002-FY2007, $1,675.4 TRILLION. 6 years! Average, $279.23 BILLION PER YEAR.


    Total deficits under the Democrat Congress FY2008-FY2011, $4,464.6 TRILLION!! 4 years. Average, $1,116.5 TRILLION PER YEAR.

    Total increase in national debt under EIGHT YEARS of Bush with both Republican and Democrat Congress.

    $4,899,100,310,608.44= $51.0 billion per month.

    Total increase in national debt under THREE YEARS of obama and a Democrat Congress.

    $4,786,153935,929.06 = $129.4 billion per month.

    If spending and debt is your criteria, obama is spending at a rate FOUR TIMES faster than Bush, and increasing the debt at a rate TWO AND A HALF TIMES FASTER than Bush.

    SOURCE:

    http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/NPGateway

    That is treasury.GOV, not Fox News or Limbaugh

    And the tax cuts put $1,800 TRILLION into the hands of the middle class to decide how they wished to spend it, rather than give it to the govt to waste. And if you're curious, the Bush tax cuts also put an extra $420 billion into the hands of the rich while it saved the middle class $1.8 TRILLION.
    DON'T BLAME ME, I DIDN'T VOTE FOR THE FOOL! X 2
    LIBERALISM,,the new front name for,,,COMMUNISM
    TWO people spending ONE person's money, DOES NOT improve the economy!
    "Money is better than poverty, even if its just for financial reasons."--Woody Allen


  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CoolWalker View Post
    I am curious. Were any of you one of the Obama followers and voted for him in 2008 who has seen the error of your ways, and what changed your opinion of him?
    NO!

    I voted for Obama, and I am very happy with the progress he has been able to achieve after inheriting the last administration's fiasco and in spite of the constant hatred and barriers thrown at our President by the GOP and the vitriolic Right wing media.

    In fact, I am even happier with Obama since he abandonned the vain attempts to compromise with the right and he is doing what needs to be done in spite of the Right.

    I will proudly vote for Obama again. . .


    But I notice that your bogus poll doesn't include that option, right?

    Is that a purposeful effort to fool stupid people? Or do you truly not know how to create a valid poll?

  3. Default

    I voted for President Obama and I think he has done a remarkable job considering the state of the nation he was handed and the complete lack of cooperation from the republicans. In fact he has had nearly 4 years now of open warfare from the GOP on every single thing not only he has wanted but simple day to day operations of the Govt have been turned into a months long fight by the republicans.

    Faced with that I think everyone can agree he has done a pretty good job.

    I intend to vote for him again, the republicans have offered nothing and I do mean nothing in the way of solution's or candidates.

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RevAnarchist View Post
    No Obama has destroyed our country
    If was destroyed byt the republican log before President Obama was elected.

    You want to talk about spending??? Look at your parties wild spending before you wrongly attach it to this President.
    Remember, somewhere out there is 2 billion in cash the bush admin can't account for, they spent a trillion bailing out the banks... and 3 more trillion on 2 wars.
    The right has NO room to whine about spending.

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Craftsman View Post
    If was destroyed byt the republican log before President Obama was elected.

    You want to talk about spending??? Look at your parties wild spending before you wrongly attach it to this President.
    Remember, somewhere out there is 2 billion in cash the bush admin can't account for, they spent a trillion bailing out the banks... and 3 more trillion on 2 wars.
    The right has NO room to whine about spending.
    Care to post a link to this "phantom" $2 trillion? An official link, not some lying radical stupid left wing nut idiot site.

    Total deficits under Bush with a Republican Congress FY2002-FY2007, $1,675.4 TRILLION. 6 years! Average, $279.23 BILLION PER YEAR.


    Total deficits under the Democrat Congress FY2008-FY2011, $4,464.6 TRILLION!! 4 years. Average, $1,116.5 TRILLION PER YEAR.

    Total increase in national debt under EIGHT YEARS of Bush with both Republican and Democrat Congress.

    $4,899,100,310,608.44= $51.0 billion per month.

    Total increase in national debt under THREE YEARS of obama and a Democrat Congress.

    $4,786,153935,929.06 = $129.4 billion per month.

    If spending and debt is your criteria, obama is spending at a rate FOUR TIMES faster than Bush, and increasing the debt at a rate TWO AND A HALF TIMES FASTER than Bush.

    SOURCE:

    http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/NPGateway

    That is treasury.GOV, not Fox News or Limbaugh.

    You have some official site that can confirm your liberal lies that's better than the US Treasury that is now under the control of the obama administration?

    It is incredible that anyone could be so extremely gullible as to believe such obviously biased LIES. But that is exactly how obama got elected.

    Here is an example of the silliness of the left in believing craziness. The left blogidiots claim that Bush never PAID for the 2 wars. Where did that ridiculous nonsense come from? The first year of the war was not in the budget because the budget was written before 9-11 and no one knew we would be going to war. So it was what is referred to as "off budget." Over time, brainwashed liberals rewrote the truth to be "off the books." Every cent of the war costs and every other cost is included in the deficit. If it was an 'off budget" item it is not included in the "budget deficit" but is still in the Federal deficit and is added to the national debt.
    Your phantom $2 trillion is 100% a figment of a lying liberal imagination.
    DON'T BLAME ME, I DIDN'T VOTE FOR THE FOOL! X 2
    LIBERALISM,,the new front name for,,,COMMUNISM
    TWO people spending ONE person's money, DOES NOT improve the economy!
    "Money is better than poverty, even if its just for financial reasons."--Woody Allen

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    Care to post a link to this "phantom" $2 trillion? An official link, not some lying radical stupid left wing nut idiot site.

    Total deficits under Bush with a Republican Congress FY2002-FY2007, $1,675.4 TRILLION. 6 years! Average, $279.23 BILLION PER YEAR.


    Total deficits under the Democrat Congress FY2008-FY2011, $4,464.6 TRILLION!! 4 years. Average, $1,116.5 TRILLION PER YEAR.

    Total increase in national debt under EIGHT YEARS of Bush with both Republican and Democrat Congress.

    $4,899,100,310,608.44= $51.0 billion per month.

    Total increase in national debt under THREE YEARS of obama and a Democrat Congress.

    $4,786,153935,929.06 = $129.4 billion per month.

    If spending and debt is your criteria, obama is spending at a rate FOUR TIMES faster than Bush, and increasing the debt at a rate TWO AND A HALF TIMES FASTER than Bush.

    SOURCE:

    http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/NPGateway

    That is treasury.GOV, not Fox News or Limbaugh.

    You have some official site that can confirm your liberal lies that's better than the US Treasury that is now under the control of the obama administration?

    It is incredible that anyone could be so extremely gullible as to believe such obviously biased LIES. But that is exactly how obama got elected.

    Here is an example of the silliness of the left in believing craziness. The left blogidiots claim that Bush never PAID for the 2 wars. Where did that ridiculous nonsense come from? The first year of the war was not in the budget because the budget was written before 9-11 and no one knew we would be going to war. So it was what is referred to as "off budget." Over time, brainwashed liberals rewrote the truth to be "off the books." Every cent of the war costs and every other cost is included in the deficit. If it was an 'off budget" item it is not included in the "budget deficit" but is still in the Federal deficit and is added to the national debt.
    Your phantom $2 trillion is 100% a figment of a lying liberal imagination.
    Tell you what you include the cost of the wars Which with all your juvenile name calling you fail to do) and the 2008 budget in your numbers....you know for honesty sake....and then we can talk.

    And maybe you should look again, it's 2 billion not trillion that bush lost in cash someplace in Iraq.
    Why is spending a bad thing only when a Democrat does it?
    Last edited by Craftsman; Feb 19 2012 at 09:17 AM.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Craftsman View Post
    Tell you what you include the cost of the wars Which with all your juvenile name calling you fail to do) and the 2008 budget in your numbers....you know for honesty sake....and then we can talk.

    And maybe you should look again, it's 2 billion not trillion that bush lost in cash someplace in Iraq.
    Why is spending a bad thing only when a Democrat does it?
    The cost of the wars IS in the deficit numbers and in the debt increase numbers. And the treasury has established that the cost of the 2 wars from the beginning to Jan 2010 was right at $1 trillion dollars. Every cent up to Jan 2009, charged to the Bush administration.
    That is one trillion dollars total, not per year..

    And the lost $2 billion,,,,,,,,Check with Solyndra, other Green Energy companies and, the Chevy Volt, you'll find the $2 billion plus interest.
    What your $2 billion is, is government waste and inefficiency. That's Government Bureaucracies, not administrations. All administrations vow to fix that, Bush AND obama both made such vows. But they never do. Cutting way back on Govt size will be the best fix of the waste and inefficiency. But the Democrats absolutely will not do that and I give the Republicans less than a 1 in 100 chance they will.

    And calling liberals exactly what they are is just the truth.
    DON'T BLAME ME, I DIDN'T VOTE FOR THE FOOL! X 2
    LIBERALISM,,the new front name for,,,COMMUNISM
    TWO people spending ONE person's money, DOES NOT improve the economy!
    "Money is better than poverty, even if its just for financial reasons."--Woody Allen

  8. #18

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    The cost of the wars IS in the deficit numbers and in the debt increase numbers. And the treasury has established that the cost of the 2 wars from the beginning to Jan 2010 was right at $1 trillion dollars. Every cent up to Jan 2009, charged to the Bush administration.
    That is one trillion dollars total, not per year..

    And the lost $2 billion,,,,,,,,Check with Solyndra, other Green Energy companies and, the Chevy Volt, you'll find the $2 billion plus interest.
    What your $2 billion is, is government waste and inefficiency. That's Government Bureaucracies, not administrations. All administrations vow to fix that, Bush AND obama both made such vows. But they never do. Cutting way back on Govt size will be the best fix of the waste and inefficiency. But the Democrats absolutely will not do that and I give the Republicans less than a 1 in 100 chance they will.

    And calling liberals exactly what they are is just the truth.

    And I guess the 800 billions stimulus was also credited to Bush. . .who initiated it?

    And I guess the consequences of 2008 crash. . .due in great part to the Bush administration policies had no consequences beyond January 20, 2009?

    And obviously, neither did the budget for 2009 drawn in 2008?

    The global economic slow down is ALSO Obama's fault, right?

    And it is obviously Obama's fault that Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy is continuing to add a huge burden on our budget. . .

    Fair and balanced. . .just like Fox News, right? LOL!

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Craftsman View Post
    Tell you what you include the cost of the wars Which with all your juvenile name calling you fail to do) and the 2008 budget in your numbers....you know for honesty sake....and then we can talk.

    And maybe you should look again, it's 2 billion not trillion that bush lost in cash someplace in Iraq.
    Why is spending a bad thing only when a Democrat does it?
    And the TRILLION the Bush administration spent bailing out the banks?????????
    1. $700 billion was authorized.
    2, Much less was ever expended. Around $300 billion not disbursed under TARP. But USED by obama for other programs.
    3. As of July 2011, according to Timothy Geitner, ALL but $50 billion of the disbursed TARP funds, had been repaid. That $50 billion is lost as the companies that received it went OOB.
    4. The TARP law called for any amounts repaid to be used exclusively to reduce the national debt. The obama administration used TARP repayments for mortgage relief programs, thus burning through the money in FAILED mortgage relief programs.
    5. T.A.R.P. Was passed by a DEMOCRAT HOUSE, and DEMOCRAT SENATE.

    And TARP was NOT in the budget that the DEMOCRATS passed. Presidents submit budget PROPOSALS, Congress passes US Budgets. For instance, so far NO obama budget PROPOSAL has been passed by either a Democrat controlled Congress or the split Democrat Senate/ Republican House. We have now. Democrats have not passed a budget since March 2009. The new Republican House passed a budget on time and delivered it to the Democrat Senate. There it still sits. The singular thing the Democrat Senate has done on a budget is reject obama's 2012 proposal 97-0. Now its time for a FY 2013 budget, and the Senate has yet to act on any 2012 budget other than rejecting obama 97-0
    Last edited by Dan40; Feb 19 2012 at 10:33 AM.
    DON'T BLAME ME, I DIDN'T VOTE FOR THE FOOL! X 2
    LIBERALISM,,the new front name for,,,COMMUNISM
    TWO people spending ONE person's money, DOES NOT improve the economy!
    "Money is better than poverty, even if its just for financial reasons."--Woody Allen

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan40 View Post
    The cost of the wars IS in the deficit numbers and in the debt increase numbers. And the treasury has established that the cost of the 2 wars from the beginning to Jan 2010 was right at $1 trillion dollars. Every cent up to Jan 2009, charged to the Bush administration.
    That is one trillion dollars total, not per year..

    And the lost $2 billion,,,,,,,,Check with Solyndra, other Green Energy companies and, the Chevy Volt, you'll find the $2 billion plus interest.
    What your $2 billion is, is government waste and inefficiency. That's Government Bureaucracies, not administrations. All administrations vow to fix that, Bush AND obama both made such vows. But they never do. Cutting way back on Govt size will be the best fix of the waste and inefficiency. But the Democrats absolutely will not do that and I give the Republicans less than a 1 in 100 chance they will.

    And calling liberals exactly what they are is just the truth.
    So you've got nothing other than the standard talking points.
    Thats what I figured.

+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks