Of course, that's not really the entire truth either, news like to blow up personal stories and I'm sure any country has problems like this (or the inverse one, that the person just stays at home not expecting an ambulance).
A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still.
I would always try to compare a country of less than 10,000,000 people with one with over 350,000,000 in every imaginable category. In my opinion, the only thing such a comparison would do is demnstrate the logic of limiting the U.S. Federal government and putting more power in the hands of the states and even cities.
I would never entertain such a parochial argument since the resources are simply scaled up pro rata. In fact, there should be economies of scale in such a move. If Britain, for example can provide a universal health service on 5% admin cost, why is it three times that in the USA to administer a "system" which does not reach 40M citizens?
Last edited by Colonel K; Apr 20 2012 at 05:45 AM.
Hello! I'm from Europe, the place where history comes from.
The economy of scale yields to the corruption of scale. I would never entertain such a illogical argument as resources are simply scaled up. It shows an amazing faith and an even more incredible gullibilty. You seem to have faith in government and in the numbers they claim.
Last edited by PatrickT; Apr 20 2012 at 08:20 AM.
Last edited by GeneralZod; Apr 20 2012 at 12:17 PM.
When the seagulls follow the trawler, it is because they think the sardines will be thrown into the sea.
There's a saying that goes, 'People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.'
OK. How about, 'Nobody should throw stones'? That's crappy behavior.
My policy is, 'No stone throwing regardless of housing situation.'