+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Should Kagan be removed from the bench?

  1. Default Should Kagan be removed from the bench?

    Does Elena Kagan have a $20 million commitment to destroying the American Republic?

    What would you say if you learned that a member of the highest court in the land has spent the last 30 years openly advocating for the destruction of the US Constitution and even went so far as to accept $20 million from Shariah Law proponents to accomplish her goal?

    That Supreme Court Justice is Elena Kagan.

    The year after Ronald Reagan entered the Oval Office with the goal of restoring America to greatness; Elena Kagan penned a telling and disturbing senior thesis titled "To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933." In that body of work, Kagan lamented that "a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States"; and that," no "radical party" had yet "attained the status of a major political force." Kagan went on to sound a rally cry for "those who, more than half a century after socialism's decline, still wish to change America."

    Apparently, this was no mere college dalliance, as the Elena Kagan has spent the rest of her career working to remove the underpinnings of freedom and destroy the American Constitution from within. And Kagan's grand plan has worked very well indeed.

    After graduate school Kagan went on to become Dean of Harvard Law, where she removed Constitutional Law classes from the curriculum, and replaced those necessary and time honored classes with required studies of international law. And in what appears to be a game of using a mutual enemy's resources to accomplish ones' true objective, Kagan also accepted a $20 million grant from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal - a noted Shariah Law proponent - to implement an "Islamic Studies" program.

    Source
    "Progressives are the architects of American decline, and progressivism is the ideology of American suicide." - Dinesh D'Souza

  2. Prosper.com, finance, financial, investing, lending, borrowing, banking, credit card, payday, borrowers, lenders, debt consolidation, Prosper, investment, personal loans, personal loan, investors, investment opportunities, debt consolidation

  3. Default

    Got a source for that?

  4. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leftysergeant View Post
    Got a source for that?
    There was one in the OP, but here is another: http://www.creators.com/opinion/dick...t-harvard.html.
    "Progressives are the architects of American decline, and progressivism is the ideology of American suicide." - Dinesh D'Souza

  5. Default

    The 20m$ Grant, I assume was to Harvard and it's unlikely anyone could prove what written demands were made, if any. I'd further question if acceptance was her idea, the School or some combination.

    In any event to remove people in certain Federal positions, requires the
    "Impeachment Process" which must be used. I can't find anything during her "Confirmation Hearings" (on this issue), but for instance if this was mentioned and she lied to Congress under oath, it could be used for grounds.


    Impeachment is a two-step process; the impeachment phase is similar to a Grand Jury hearing, where charges (called "articles of impeachment") are presented and the House of Representatives determines whether the evidence is sufficient to warrant a trial. If the House vote passes by a simple majority, the defendant is "impeached," and proceeds to trial in the Senate.

    The House of Representatives indicts the accused on articles of impeachment, and, if impeached, the Senate conducts a trial to determine the party's guilt or innocence.
    http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Can_a_US_S...ed_from_office


    Off topic, but wouldn't it be interesting to have every Candidate for P/VP be question (pick a reason) by Congress, under oath prior to the National Elections.

  6. Default

    http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/05/cr...to-sharia-law/

    Considering all of these claims were made prior to Elena's Supreme Court confirmation- exactly what of the provisions of impeachment has Elena Kagan violated as Justice? Has she committed treason? No. Has she committed a high misdemeanor or felony? You failed to mention that.

    Or are you just suggesting that Congress should ignore the Constitution and impeach her because you don't approve of her?
    The real harm is to our children. As long as we remain suspicious of the wrong people, predators will continue to have free reign to abuse innocent children. If they remain free from scrutiny because everyone else is focusing on gays and lesbians, more young lives will continue to be shattered and more parents will suffer the agonizing heartache of learning that they trusted someone who destroyed their child’s future.

  7. Default

    And as an alternative to hysterical cries of doom, I thought I would post some information for those who cared to actually read about Kagan's thesis....

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/newswee...princeton.html

    http://hnn.us/articles/126906.html
    The real harm is to our children. As long as we remain suspicious of the wrong people, predators will continue to have free reign to abuse innocent children. If they remain free from scrutiny because everyone else is focusing on gays and lesbians, more young lives will continue to be shattered and more parents will suffer the agonizing heartache of learning that they trusted someone who destroyed their child’s future.

  8. #7

    Default

    The question is moot because supreme court justices can't be removed from the bench.

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fmw View Post
    The question is moot because supreme court justices can't be removed from the bench.
    YES, they can, read post number 4....

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by onalandline View Post
    Does Elena Kagan have a $20 million commitment to destroying the American Republic?

    What would you say if you learned that a member of the highest court in the land has spent the last 30 years openly advocating for the destruction of the US Constitution and even went so far as to accept $20 million from Shariah Law proponents to accomplish her goal?

    That Supreme Court Justice is Elena Kagan.

    The year after Ronald Reagan entered the Oval Office with the goal of restoring America to greatness; Elena Kagan penned a telling and disturbing senior thesis titled "To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933." In that body of work, Kagan lamented that "a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States"; and that," no "radical party" had yet "attained the status of a major political force." Kagan went on to sound a rally cry for "those who, more than half a century after socialism's decline, still wish to change America."

    Apparently, this was no mere college dalliance, as the Elena Kagan has spent the rest of her career working to remove the underpinnings of freedom and destroy the American Constitution from within. And Kagan's grand plan has worked very well indeed.

    After graduate school Kagan went on to become Dean of Harvard Law, where she removed Constitutional Law classes from the curriculum, and replaced those necessary and time honored classes with required studies of international law. And in what appears to be a game of using a mutual enemy's resources to accomplish ones' true objective, Kagan also accepted a $20 million grant from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal - a noted Shariah Law proponent - to implement an "Islamic Studies" program.

    Source
    is this a faux news report
    ~
    belief is what is important, not so much what you believe, for instance, an ordinary sugar pill without belief helps no one, but with belief it can cure your ills and it can be quite the amazing little pill - the magic really comes from within - FreshAir
    ~

  11. Default

    Remove sexual deviant Clarence Thomas and avowed fascist Scalia from the Supreme Court.
    Corporations enjoyed their highest profits since 1900 under President Obama ~ why don't the right wing media celebrate this TRUTH?

    November 2012 elections: A victory for America!

+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. "Under God"... should be removed from the "Pledge"
    By Johnny-C in forum Political Opinions & Beliefs
    Replies: 442
    Last Post: Mar 09 2012, 11:14 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks