Looks like an NBC stooge better retain counsel. http://news.yahoo.com/police-invest...-displayed-ammunition-magazine-163716314.html http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/1...o-use-high-capacity-magazine-in-news-segment/ quote: If it turns out the magazine was in violation of D.C. law, the fact that NBC News was warned by the D.C. Police not to use the magazine puts a whole new light on the incident, turning it into an intentional violation of the law. While the law does not require intent, the existence of intent could influence a decision whether or not to prosecute. That which applies to Joe Average Citizen should equally apply to the MSM.
Brandishing a firearm is not free speech. Apparently the DC law treats parts of firearms the same as complete firearms.
Bad news, Dave. What you did was a clear violation of the law. Even the screeching liberalsd at politico.com notice. http://www.politico.com/blogs/media...david-gregory-to-show-empty-152829.html?hp=r2 quote: “Asked whether it would be legal to show a magazine without bullets, Metcalf replied: "It'd still be illegal." A law professor says if David Gregory were not David Gregory, he’d already be in jail. A soldier returning from Afghanistan was jailed under this law. http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/12/if-david-gregory-were-not-david-gregory/ Taxcutter says: Maybe NBC News should move their DC-area studios to Harper’s Ferry. How far does “special treatment” go?