Mikie Mann Caught Playing Fast and Loose with Numbers ---Again

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by Elmer Fudd, Mar 8, 2013.

  1. Elmer Fudd

    Elmer Fudd New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This guys credibility going the way of Al Gore.


    MICHAEL MANN CAUGHT DOCTORING DATA AGAIN

    Prominent global warming alarmist Michael Mann misrepresented data in a public presentation on global warming to give the false impression that global temperatures have been rising as fast as or faster than predicted by alarmist computer models. Scientist/mathematician Steve McIntyre showed Mann misleadingly presented land-only temperature readings (which are warmer than combined land/ocean temperature readings) and compared them to climate alarmist James Hansen’s land/ocean temperature predictions to support his false claim that real-world warming is outpacing computer models. Mann’s supporting temperature chart ends in 2005 even though post-2005 temperatures were available. The post-2005 data show real-world temperatures are substantially lower than Hansen’s predictions.

    SOURCE: Climate Audit http://climateaudit.org/2013/03/02/mikes-agu-trick/

    Of course, amid massive accusations of fraud and intellectual dishonesty a few years ago, Penn State conducted a closed internal investigation of Mikie, and determined he had done nothing wrong (and therefore they did not have to give back all that grant money).

    And of course, we all know the Penn State admins would never do anything to cover up the truth.........:roll:
     
  2. Colonel K

    Colonel K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,770
    Likes Received:
    556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    More lies from the denier cult, nothing to see here. He can hardly be "caught again" since he's never been caught before.
     
  3. Elmer Fudd

    Elmer Fudd New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    Messages:
    823
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Standard warmist "answer"...."I don't like it , so its not true".....:) Got anything that might be called "backup" to your claim that the author (McIntrye) is lying?? He presents some pretty damming evidence from Mann and Hansen themselves showcasing their inconsistencies and manipulation. Your "response", ..........is valueless
     
  4. MannieD

    MannieD New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2006
    Messages:
    5,127
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So are the skeptics now admitting that climate sensitivity is 4.5C? Because that's the CS that Hansen used in the study the skeptics keep referring to .
     
  5. Windigo

    Windigo Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    15,026
    Likes Received:
    1,139
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why would we agree that a sensitivity assumption that has failed is correct?
     

Share This Page