US adaptive war plan in Syria has backfired: Nobody believes the chem attack

The US objective, likely to instigate a chemical attack and blame it on the sovereign and internationally recognized legitimate government of Syria, has backfired. Nobody believes the US and its allegations that its own bombs and warplanes are necessary to bring about peace in Syria. The United states is funding and supplying the opposition, a fact that they originally denied, a fact that was proven irrevocably, and they have since been forced to admit publicly, ergo it is well known the US is creating the war conditions in Syria. A UN resolution in its most peaceful form would be to deny the US the squealing pleasure of its own involvement in human misery. It seems the US, like many of the people in its own military, doesn't have a leg to stand on.

The UN, unless it is a blatant puppet of the US regime (which no doubt it is, like many other countries and organizations are) would never believe the US's chicken littling about the necessity of UN and American troops, bombs, and warplanes in Syria. How will the US instigate and escalate the conflict in Syria now under the false guise of peace as it is known that the USA *IS* the lack of peace in Syria? How will the United States destroy the historic Syrian government and instate a US puppet regime now?

As it is, the Middle East is unlikely to forget nor forgive the US's militant belligerency, and the sheer effect of the US Pentagon's incompetence might be to give the region 4 more countries whose sole condition is to hate and despise the US, as if they did not need any additional material for their history books!

When will the US wage peace? When will the US beligerency subside? Will the US Pentagon keep shoveling more and more coal of American prosperity and well-being into the steam engine of waste, even as it is clear that the locomotive is heading into disaster?

It has a failed market system of tyranny, corporate toxic products and abusive exploitative organizations that operate against the people. When will the US solve its own problems? The people of the world are not ASKING, BEGGING, or WANTING to be given diabetes!!



http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...991e36-9387-11e2-8e33-9cc6c739d012_story.html

WASHINGTON — Foes of Syrian President Bashar Assad are distracted by fragmentation within their ranks, foreign meddling and new finger-pointing over chemical weapons as the regime more firmly entrenches itself, giving no sign of stepping down any time soon.

With the two-year civil war slogging on, the United States appears closer than ever to sending military support to Syrian rebels in hopes of breaking the bloody impasse that has left more than 70,000 dead and forced more than 1 million refugees to flee their homes. Beyond at least the threat of military intervention, there is growing consensus among the U.S. and its allies that little can be done to put new pressure on Assad to go. New allegations this week — almost as quickly debunked — that chemical weapons may have been used against neighborhoods outside Damascus and in Syria’s north spooked the White House and Congress and ratcheted up demands for the U.S. to hamper what one Democratic lawmaker described as Assad’s “killing spree.”

On his first foreign trip of his second term, President Barack Obama this week maintained his long-standing view that “Assad must go, and I believe he will go.” He repeated his caution about sending military assistance to Syrian opposition forces, which could prolong the fighting and unintentionally put U.S. weapons in the hands of Islamic extremists. But Obama also held firm to his stance that Assad would cross a red line if he were to use his suspected stockpile of chemical weapons — including nerve agents and mustard gas — against the Syrian people.

“It’s tragic, it’s heartbreaking, and the sight of children and women being slaughtered that we’ve seen so much I think has to compel all of us to say, ‘What more can we do?’” Obama said Friday during a news conference in Amman, Jordan. “And that’s a question that I’m asking as president every single day.” Secretary of State John Kerry travels to Paris on Wednesday to meet French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius for talks expected to focus on arming Syrian rebels. The discussion also is expected to touch on the suspected use of chemical weapons in Syria, according to French officials.

On Thursday, a U.S. official cited strong indications that chemical weapons were not used in an attack Tuesday in northern Aleppo province but could not rule out the possibility. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the matter involved intelligence-gathering. At the same time, the U.N. said it would investigate whether chemical weapons were used and specifically is looking at the regime’s claim that rebel forces launched the deadly agents. But U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon warned that the investigation “will not happen overnight” — meaning that the debate over whether the deadly agents were used almost certainly will drag out. And State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland on Friday acknowledged difficulties of the U.S. launching its own probe, largely because American investigators cannot visit the sites of the alleged attacks.

 

Personally, I believe they backed off on the "chemical attack" recourse option because they aren't yet ready to proceed "full steam ahead" with the chess game just yet. The chemical attack may or may not have actually happened but, the corner they backed themselves into was executed prematurely so, denied (for now).

 

Shockingly awful.