1. When the verdict was read, the Charges were NOT stated by the jury. 2. Just like the Casey Anthony trial, several days of this trial were in session on days that the State of Florida courthouses are closed. Govt employees don't work on weekends. 3. GZ was on "house arrest" for the majority, if not the entirety of the trial. 4. The role of GZ appears to have been played by at least 2 different men. 5. Can it be empirically proven that TM ever even existed? Birth/Death certificates? A personal acquaintance of mine, a Sanford EMT, was on the first medical response team. He said that when he showed up, other agencies were already there, and all he ever saw was a body under a sheet. Guys who were not from his department put the body in an ambulance, which was also not the ambulance his team drove to the scene. 6. Did Seminole County really pay for the lights to stay on in the entire building all night, while the jury deliberated? Coincidentally creating those beautifully cinematic establishing shots for the MSNBC/FOX/CNN cameras? 7. Didn't this trial raise a lot of "charitable contributions from supporters" of the families of both the Stars of the show? 8. Did everyone forget TM's daddy is a Mason (a.k.a. Luciferian???) The whole thing, just like the Casey trial, is a Hollywood/Disney production. Sanford. Orlando, Florida. Walt Disney World. 9. No actual legal proceedings were taking place. We know this by the omissions of several phrases that must legally be stated in courtrooms, during all trials. Its a bunch of actors playing out roles, in a real courthouse, for MSM cameras. 10. Look up the name of the female lawyer for GZ. She exists ONLY in the case of GZ. Nowhere else on the entire internet. Yet she is also seemingly the actress that played James Holmes attorney at his bond hearings. She started this trial as a brunette and was heavier. Now she's blonde and much thinner. Over the course of a few DAYS!! That's called Method Acting. Is it possible, that because he was never arrested, and never charged, that it was ok for them to have this mock trial and televise it? Obviously they would not be able to convict GZ Guilty. They wouldn't be able to actually throw him in jail, so he's "not guilty". And that's why charges were NOT read during the verdict. Maybe they faked the trial to appease and psychologically suppress possible rioters. Notice Obama's ridiculous commentary on the whole debacle, from early on? The whole thing is fake.
Validation, now you're just getting desperate. I honestly doubt you're even real, you're probably just a web bot that is programmed to denounce all things seen on the media. You're so predictable.
Certain hallucinogenic drugs actually do - specifically after prolonged use - cause you to question the reality of things around you.
In all honesty, i think he is half right, or at least slightly misguided. The trial itself was as real as it comes, but it was publicized by TPTB for their own purposes. Here you have a mixed raced man, shooting a black thug. With the rise of Hispanic and mixed raced people in the D.S.A., they probably felt like racial hatred needed to be focused on from a different angle than the typical white vs black/ black vs white hate.
I'm not trying to be unpredictable. I like to analyze the big stories (this case being Huge in my particular area) to find out the Real messages being sent by the blood drinking witches at the top of the Western pyramid of deception. Any comments on any of the 10 points I offered?
Not really since i am a foreigner so i have no idea about your court proceedings , if i were you i would check what else was in the news all this time the trial got the headlines .
This OP follows the findings of the study by Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas perfectly. They write: Or, more specifically the Op's premise is: I have questions that I don't know the answer to, therefore the whole thing was faked to try and trick me.
Your theory is at least much more plausible than Validations. This just in from Captain Obvious: DUH!!
George Zimmerman is an anagram for Me Raze Ginger, Mom. (You can also replace 'ginger' with the "n word", but the auto censor won't like it.) The plot thickens.
Every aspect of our perception has been manipulated by a currently unseen force. We can only see the effects of this force, not the force itself. This trial is part of that perception manipulation. - - - Updated - - - It says GZ, not OZ.
I'm really not all too sure, anymore. I think its possible that the physical dimension we exist within may be real. But that's even been brought into question by the worlds top scientists a lot lately.
Validation Boy commented in supported of a thread that KAMALAYKA posted using a study that KAMALAYKA didn't read. In the study it's made clear that people like Validation boy don't care about what's real. That's not their concern. All they care about is supporting their belief that "authority" is dishonest and will never tell the truth. The study was supported with empirical study of the arguments of truthers, moon landing hoaxers, JFK assassination theorists, et al. All of them spent the majority of their time arguing that the "official story" could not be correct, and spent very little time arguing in support of a specific alternate sequence of events. In fact, they were found to be most likely to equally believe two completely contradictory alternate explanations of events. For example they will equally believe that Princess Dianna was assassinated, while simultaneously believing that Princess Dianna faked her death and is still alive. Obviously they both can't be truth. Look at his comment in response to you. He talks about unseen forces and manipulation for mysterious reasons. The reality part of it doesn't matter to him. all that matters is to validate his mistrust.
That was your interpretation of said article. And that article was speculative opinion, not scientific data. LoL. And yes, Dianna can be both assassinated and faking her death simultaneously. We're talking about interdimensional entities, fang beer. The laws of physics do not apply to interdimensional entities.
Tactic #1: Attack the person, and not the ideas they propose. Straight Brown-Shirt warrior, aren't you? I know well your disdain for my thoughts and ideas. But how about refuting some of my 10 points in the OP? Wouldn't that be more fun for you?
I'd have an easier time getting a handle on what you're talking about if I knew what, specifically are the things that were omitted that are required for a real trial? What was the name of the attorney that I'm supposed to not find if I google her but can't since I don't have her name. I'm willing to look, but give me something I can check.