Paper: Decrease in planetary temperature between 1982-2006

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by MolonLabe2009, Aug 3, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Al Gore. Paging Al Gore. Please pick up the red courtesy phone."

    Well, there you have it.

    The earth has been cooling since 1982.

    METEOSAT DERIVED PLANETARY TEMPERATURE TREND 1982-2006
     
  2. JEFF9K

    JEFF9K New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,658
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow. 99.99999% of scientists were wrong! And you got in a jab at Al Gore!
     
  3. DonGlock26

    DonGlock26 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    47,159
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Jeff, serious question, do you really believe that 99.99999% of scientists did the resaerch that claims that man-made global warming is real?
     
  4. MolonLabe2009

    MolonLabe2009 Banned

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2009
    Messages:
    33,092
    Likes Received:
    15,284
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So, that means you believe in everything that scientist state. Just like these scientist...

    Scientists ‘95% Sure’ Bigfoot Lives in Russian Tundra

    Or do you only believe in the scientist that push your liberal agenda?
     
  5. Flintc

    Flintc New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,879
    Likes Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If this is real, then it's great. I'm convinced, but they're going to have to get the memo to the glaciers and the arctic.
     
  6. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you mean 99.99999% of scientists who are getting huge grants from the Government?
     
  7. Montoya

    Montoya Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2011
    Messages:
    14,274
    Likes Received:
    455
    Trophy Points:
    83
    The debate is long over. Global warming is real and is man made. That is now established fact.
     
  8. johnmayo

    johnmayo New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    13,847
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    99.99% of global warming scientists believe their job has some value.

    Proven "facts" Montoya match observed data. That is not what happened here.
     
  9. TomFitz

    TomFitz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2013
    Messages:
    40,412
    Likes Received:
    15,897
    Trophy Points:
    113
  10. AKR

    AKR New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,940
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, this looks legitimate. lol, climate gate.

    I guess the thousands of climate scientists were wrong because you found something on the interwebz that says otherwise. And I'm sure you went about this in a completely unbiased and scientific way and it has nothing to do with your absolute denial of anything you associate with liberals. How many climate scientists or scientific studies would it take for you to believe that climate change is happening? Apparently, even though 97% of all scientific research papers on the subject support the reality of climate change, that's still not enough for you. Something tells me it could be 100% and it wouldn't make a difference. A VERY small portion of scientific papers (and are any of them NOT funded by fossil fuel companies?) say climate change isn't happening (or even more stupidly, say the planet is cooling), and yet, those are the ones you think are legit. Something's wrong here.
     
  11. Ctrl

    Ctrl Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    25,745
    Likes Received:
    1,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The thousands of climate scientists are wrong all the time. Every prediction they make is wrong... much to their confusion. It would appear this is primarily because they are working with faulty data and badly programmed computer modeling.
     
  12. JEFF9K

    JEFF9K New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,658
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You don't know much about scientists. The ones getting rich are the ones working for the oil companies, the deniers.

    "Not gonna vote Republican
    They're climate-change deniers.
    That's cuz Big Oil bought a group
    Of scientists for hire."
     
  13. JEFF9K

    JEFF9K New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,658
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you really believe Fox News and talk radio?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Bad logic.
     
  14. JEFF9K

    JEFF9K New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,658
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you trust Fox News more than science?

    Ctrl-DELETE!


    Cn
     
  15. AKR

    AKR New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,940
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A baseless comment. And it's funny that you say they're wrong all the time, but you have no probably taking some random study as fact. Anyone who says something you agree with is infallible, and anyone who disagrees is faulty. How scientific. :roll:
     
  16. Ctrl

    Ctrl Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    25,745
    Likes Received:
    1,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
  17. Ctrl

    Ctrl Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    25,745
    Likes Received:
    1,944
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A baseless comment.

    I haven't "taken" anything. I don't know the degree to which the human population affects the climate in relation to the cosmos. I am an AGW agnostic... however there is a whole lotta bull(*)(*)(*)(*) from the AGW fear mongers. I tend to heavily scrutinize such without accuracy of prediction... especially in the face of a conflict of interest in denouncing such. They do admit fault a lot. That is what keeps me listening. If they just denied everything... well... they would be you.

    See... I can be convinced of man-made AGW. You cannot be convinced otherwise I am willing to wager.

    We call the post I am replying to, projection.
     
  18. mikezila

    mikezila New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    23,299
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i'd rather go with one made by engineers actually. :nerd:

    anywho, any idiot can design their own computer. it's not rocket science.
     
  19. JEFF9K

    JEFF9K New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,658
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm talking designed from scratch, including all inventions.
     
  20. randlepatrickmcmurphy

    randlepatrickmcmurphy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    5,797
    Likes Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    113
    From the link:

    You thought we wouldn't read it, dintja?

    99% of scientists believing something is not the same thing as a dozen scientists being 95% sure of something. Remedial math for you!
     
  21. mikezila

    mikezila New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    23,299
    Likes Received:
    250
    Trophy Points:
    0
    it would still be engineers. your scientists can't make a sammich. if they could, they'd be working at Subway.
     
  22. Ethereal

    Ethereal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    40,617
    Likes Received:
    5,790
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The debate is never over in science. All explanations and descriptions are tentative.
     
  23. Radio Refugee

    Radio Refugee New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2008
    Messages:
    24,800
    Likes Received:
    318
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If you previously contended that rising temp were not important, falling temps can't now be important.

    If you believe man can alter the global climate by emitting CO2

    AND

    you believe that the alteration is economically quantifiable

    AND

    you believe that man has methods of remediation that are economically less than the damage

    AND

    you can sell all this to every country

    AND

    you're sure, not just hopeful, not just inculcating a religious belief, not just chasing a non-linear ghost

    THEN

    you can take action.
     
  24. Falena

    Falena Cherry Bomb Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    25,141
    Likes Received:
    6,724
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This thread is now closed for excessive off topic posts.


    Falena
    Political Forum Moderator
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page