http://www.911truth.org/the-911-commission-report-a-571-page-lie/ It lists the lies, one by one, and each is real easy to research so, for you folks too lazy to look for yourselves, the work has been done for you. Enjoy the truth. Non shilled responses are welcomed .
Of course they're not. Everything "officially" is 100%...no errors, not even .000001%. Conversely, every single thing mentioned in the link, is 100% inaccurate, yet you claim you'd consider anything counter, because you have an open mind. Hence, ZERO possibility of HONEST discussion with shills who claim to be reasonable people, and also shills who are completely unreasonable, no matter the point raised (like shills that lie about hanging out at airports). Do you guys REALLY think people don't know who you represent??? Does ANYONE really think you and the other team members are anything but disinformation specialists on assignment here? I would hope not. Now tell me how I run away, call the boss, and report. Meanwhile, just dismiss blocks of specific information with one big felt swoop, claiming they're ALL completely invalid, while claiming your "official" propagated version is 100% the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Geezus H.....What a joke.
I've been through Grifters 'omissions and distortions' a long time ago. Nothing has changed, they're still wrong on all counts.
Why do you start threads with overreaching claims and statement? Are you intellectually unable to identify one issue and then present the evidence? Why don't you just start a thread called, "I don't believe the 9/11 Commission Report because I don't understand the science, so there!"
This is the lead off batter and it has been proved to be made up. Unless these truthers can bring out these men out in public (shouldn't be hard with the money the truther industry has gained and where they have their meetings) If they can't then this is meaningless.
Oh look, David Ray has another book to sell and he sent his lapdogs out to shill it for him. I am wondering why 'Fraud changed the title of David Ray's book in the thread title. Just further proof that 'truthers' have a hard time telling the truth?
Yeah, yeah, yeah...don't discuss the points raised. Just badmouth, insult and cloud the issues. Par for your course.
Round and round we go. Same old, same old. The 575 page lie is merely Philip Zelikow's 'creation' . There is little evidence in it.
Same old indeed. You run away, come hurl insults, then run away again. Points have been asked, and you ignore them. Soon you will flee back to your airport lavatory again. - - - Updated - - - Bump for the Fraud.
YOU were the on claiming you were always 'in between flights', and you deny that also. Hence, my inability to engage in any form of honest conversation with you. There is no point in it.
I can link to several times that you said it. How many links can you muster up? You fail and dodge yet again, Fraud.
The TRUTH is the history only goes back two years, and not the decade or so that you've actually been here. I've personally been here since about 2008, and the site doesn't reflect that accurately either. So, what I can PROVE is what I'm left with. The truth.
You were provided an archive and you couldn't find it in there, either. Fact is, I never claimed to 'hang out' in airports. You made it up as some kind of implied insult. That's the truth - and it's the same silly insult you fall back on when the clear evidence is against you. Like calling me "boss" is supposed to be some kind of insult, when in fact it just means you are my boy.
"In between flights" is the term you used, when I first asked you why you were seemingly 'available' 24/7. Would that be accurate? Oh...and that 'archive', was missing big chunks of dates all over it. Edited? I'd say so.
More excuses for you to hold onto your lame insults. It's pretty clear I'm not 'available 24/7'. You've been called out on your falsehoods, so you have to project onto others. We get it.
.....and back to the dodge... "In between flights", was the question. Did you or did you not say it? Simple question, really.
And one I've answered numerous times. I know you have this obsession with me, but the forum isn't about your obsessions. Get over yourself.
Round and round goes the merry go round. You first used that 'obsession' line about 2008, I think . You need to stop recycling old bullet points.
Just because you can link to something doesn't mean that it contains factual evidence. Where did he get his information from? That's what it always boils down too. Any truther could give a debunker fits if they support their information with factual evidence. Seriously it would be hell. The only reason truthers have problems is that their evidence is built off of, mostly, confirmation bias. It's getting pretty pathetic for the truth leades now though. People just don't have the desire to hear it anymore. There's no evidence to support it, and there is NOBODY talking about it anymore.
