7 Dead Babies Found in Home, Any different than Abortion really?

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/utah-woman-arrested-dead-babies-found-23311819

So she killed 7 babies shortly after birth and people are OUTRAGED, but how is that different than abortion? Would people have the same reaction to her having 7 abortions? If not, why not? How is a baby's life worth less while it is inside a woman than a few minutes after he/she is born? Help me understand this.

 

It is no different.

 

She killed babies not 23 week fetuses....but I have a feeling you don't really want to understand....

 

You failed to answer the question, what difference does age make.? Baby is a term used to refer to young human beings from conception to adulthood, therefore both are the killing of a baby. "infant" fetus" "toddler" "zygote" "embryo" "adolescent" are all terms used to describe human beings at various stages of their lives.

 

The proper term for what she did is a do-it-yourself 4th trimester abortion.

 

Because they were BABIES--born! I'd rather have them ABORTED when they were the size of a thumb! Wasn't this in Utah? The state with the HIGHEST birth rate to mothers 88/1000. The "Mormon" state!

 

Yes, there is a difference.

If you can't understand it, its because you don't want to.

Try to twist it all you want...it's not even remotely similar.

 

No, "baby" does not refer to a human being from conception....only for emotional people who don't like facts and have an agenda...

 

Legally there is a difference.

Unborn babies are murdered every day by abortion doctors for hire.

The only difference is that this woman took an innocent human life in the 4th trimester which is not legal.

But its taking an innocent human life either way.

 

Its about her choice right? Isnt that what you always claim? Her body her choice.

 

Why are you using this for political purposes?

 

Just asking a valid question. I didn't kill anybody.

 

My life does not revolve around an abortion forum so there is no reason to "hide". I am using your logic. She killed the babies right after they were born. What difference is there using your logic if she killed them the moment they were born or right before? Either way its her choice right? Your logic not mine. I am showing how twisted the "her choice" view point is.

 

Women can call what they're pregnant with anything they want...they can call it a kumquat if they feel like it but scientifically it's a fetus....and even then it doesn't matter what label you put on it, it's legal to abort it before 23 weeks.....and that has nothing to do with the OP.

 

Fetus that are aborted have a zero percent chance of surviving outside of their mother.

These babies were murdered after birth.

Again, if you can't understand the difference its because you don't want to.

 

No woman has the right or "choice" to have an abortion a moment before birth and they don't do that..., that's just a ridiculous scenario.

It isn't legal to kill the baby a moment before birth unless the mother's life is in danger and that's usually determined long before that...again your scenario is just hysterics with no basis in facts...

 

No, its not. And you know that.

 

Only the child in utero is not her body,therein lies the stupidity of the "choice" argument.

- - - Updated - - -

Again, why does age matter?

 

With Abortion you can at least try to get it done while it's just a pile of cells, before the brain cells turn on.

No chance to avoid the pain after a live birth. After a baby is born viable and alive, it's murder to kill it from that point on.

 

Because a 20 week old fetus can't survive outside of the womb.

These infants had already been born.

>>> Flamebait Removed<<<

 

It makes no difference to the baby if they are killed in the 3rd trimester with the approval of their lib mother or killed in the 4th trimester by the lib mother herself.

 

People are all just a pile of cells, your post is pure nonsense. BTW, it is murder before that. In fact it is murder from conception forward in many states, if anyone other than the mother slaughters the child.

>>>Quoted Post Deleted<<<

 

It makes a difference to our legal system.

As I said...keep trying to twist. Its obvious and pathetic.

>>>Quoted Post Deleted<<<

 

Of course.

If the legal system is happy with 3rd trimester murder I'm sure the child won't mind either.

 

There is no difference as far as the child is concerned.