Nero didn't burn Rome

Discussion in 'History & Past Politicians' started by Small_government_caligula, Apr 22, 2014.

  1. Small_government_caligula

    Small_government_caligula Banned

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It was real estate speculators. Yes, he tried to build a huge palace on the empty areas of the fires aftermath, but he also lost a huge amount of money when his Domus Transitoria burned. When the people tried to blame Nero for building his huge palace on the area where these empty lots were, he had to find a scapegoat and he blamed the Christians. It wasn't his plans but it was convenient for him to blame them because they couldn't defend themselves. Rome was built mostly of wood and it was just a matter of time before there happened to be a huge fire. Nero went about rebuilding the city in stone but this is largely forgotten.
     
  2. perdidochas

    perdidochas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Messages:
    27,293
    Likes Received:
    4,346
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The legend isn't that he burned Rome, rather that he fiddled while Rome burned.
     
  3. Small_government_caligula

    Small_government_caligula Banned

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Suetonius and Dio Cassius pretty much say that he started the fire. Tacitus wrote that Nero was rumored to have sung about the destruction of Troy while Rome itself burned, but he states that this was unconfirmed by eyewitness accounts and that Nero was at his summer villa in Antium when the fire broke out.
     
  4. wyly

    wyly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,857
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    113
    we can't trust those reports...roman leaders hired their own historians to slander previous rulers and glorify the family that hired them, it was propaganda no different than what politicians use today...back in those times saying something slanderous about a relative of a ruling family was often fatal, so if it was openly said and recorded the person who said it felt safe in saying it, he had approval from the top...

    you know the expression "take it with a grain of salt", well when it involves historical roman reports about their leaders take those reports with a "shovel full of salt"...
     
  5. Small_government_caligula

    Small_government_caligula Banned

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,398
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know...I am saying that Suetonius and Dio Cassius cannot really be trusted in this case and Tacitus is more believable (although he himself was a darling of the aristocracy in his time).
     
  6. wyly

    wyly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,857
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeah it requires a lot of reading between the lines to sift out what was true and what was official bs...
     
  7. wyly

    wyly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2008
    Messages:
    13,857
    Likes Received:
    1,159
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Caligula your namesake was much maligned and probably deservedly so but there was no doubt added embellishment. to add to his notoriety...there was the reported war Caligula waged against the Neptune and the sea...he was said to have captured neptunes treasure which consisted of seashell...archaeological finds now suggest in his expedition to the north he built river ports along the Rhine to the North Sea as preparation for an invasion of Britain which his successor Claudius carried out...
     
  8. litwin

    litwin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    25,165
    Likes Received:
    759
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    +1, Caligula was RomeĀ“s Hitler , people blame him for everything
     

Share This Page