Liberals want to ban ugly men from having sex, yet promote gay is good

Ugly men cannot get sex unless they pay for it.

Liberals want to ban prostitution.

Hence, Liberals want to ban ugly men from having sex, YET they want gay men to be allowed to marry.

Major hypocrisy here?

 

It isn't conservatives who want to ban prostitution for religious reasons? Don't liberals want to legalize it?

 

im pretty sure the religious right and conservative brothers want it banned.

And plenty of ugly men have sex. They just need a great personality or big dick.

 

super21:

Some do agreed, however the righteous ones do not, especially the male and female fems.

OP could also be directed towards the non-religious right as well.

- - - Updated - - -

Plenty do NOT though, and that is the point.

It's the hypocrisy I am attacking again here - the Liberal lefties who are all in favour of gay sex, but want to legislate Ugly men totally out of the sexual picture.

 

Can't we just go ahead and ban this troll....

 

I'm not seeing the connection here But yes, most liberals want to legalize and regulate prostitution these days.

 

Try the righteous libs or the more conservative ones - they all want it banned.

So, gay sex yes, hetero no - how does that work?

- - - Updated - - -

don't like the OP? then find another thread - it's a perfectly acceptable question.

 

Provided the state vigorously enforces abortion for ugly couples I see no problem here.

Gays are always good looking, of course, so even though many socially retarded and allegedly straight men fill their outraged minds with imaginative ravings about greasy, heaving, sweaty man on man humpfests the gays don't foul up the joint with poorly attired examples of aberrant genes.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=munter

 

anything that gets banned, has an adverse affect on someone else down the road. Don't the righteous ones realise this?

 

I think men and women should be able to sell their bodies if they wish... it's their bodies to sell

it's a reach though to say only ugly men use prostitutes....

I mean is it any different then a 18 year old selling herself into marriage with a 80 year old rich guy? I may not approve, but it should be legal

.

 

agreed, and perhaps this forum is too libertarian to get a good debate going on this topic

 

This is the stupidest thread ever.

I want to ban stupid men from having sex. You're # 1.

 

Not at all stupid, because libs want to ban things without thinking of the consequences. This is like a kind of stealth tax, a tax on sexual expression by stealth.

It does stand to reason, that if an ugly man cannot get a partner unless paying for it, then any ban on sex work will affect his human rights. Why shouldn't the ugly guy allowed to love the person he wishes to?

 

I agree such stance makes zero sense but I dont think moderate liberals want to ban prostitution. It is the people on the extremes, on both sides, that gravitate towards bans on prostitution. Whether it is control freak puritanical conservatives or bat(*)(*)(*)(*) crazy feminazis, extremes of the political spectrum tend to resemble each other..

 

Both wish to continue the ban.

Liberals based on feminist idealology. Conservatives based on religious morality. Same with pornography which they find common ground on wishing to ban or limit it.

Always fun to watch when such fools strike up an alliance.

 

Or a lot of money (not in the terms of actual prostitution, but in terms of defacto prostitution).

 

You've found us out!

 

Yes good summary, quite funny seeing the feminists getting into bed with the old fashioned, sexist Cons here