May Post of the Month

Discussion in 'Announcements & Community Discussions' started by OKgrannie, Jun 4, 2014.

  1. OKgrannie

    OKgrannie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2008
    Messages:
    10,923
    Likes Received:
    130
    Trophy Points:
    63
  2. Angedras

    Angedras New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    Messages:
    8,178
    Likes Received:
    168
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Congratulations Nightmare 515, your post are appreciated.
     
  3. Shangrila

    Shangrila staff Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    29,114
    Likes Received:
    674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Great post all around. Congratulations and thanks for your contribution.
     
  4. Cubed

    Cubed Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2012
    Messages:
    17,967
    Likes Received:
    4,953
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nicely done :)
     
  5. Falena

    Falena Cherry Bomb Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2009
    Messages:
    25,165
    Likes Received:
    6,725
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Congratulations Nightmare 515.

    Excellent post and thanks for sharing that.
    Also thank you for your contribution to the board. Its appreciated.

    Falena
     
  6. flounder

    flounder In Memoriam Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    27,364
    Likes Received:
    653
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wonderful post,,,nice job......
     
  7. Herkdriver

    Herkdriver New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    21,346
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    0
    First and foremost, kudos on earning the Top Post monthly award.

    Second, being an admittedly nitpicky jerk here...

    From the post.

    The flyaway cost of a new build AH-64D Block III is $35.5M. The flyaway cost differs from another price metric, the weapon system cost. The weapon system cost, more commonly known as the procurement cost, is the total price of the aircraft.

    So the flyaway cost is the cost of making the aircraft, while the weapon system cost is the cost of buying the aircraft. I don't have that data handy as to the unitary weapon system cost of an Apache helicopter (assuming this is the attack helicopter you're referencing), but it is quite a bit more than $30M.

    Also to clarify the term Army officer. I'm assuming as you are an Army rotary wing aviator (WOMOS 153A), you're a warrant officer. A warrant officer is an officer who is designated an officer by a warrant, as distinguished from a commissioned officer who is designated an officer by a commission, and a non-commissioned officer who is designated an officer, often by virtue of seniority.
     
  8. Tram Law

    Tram Law Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2012
    Messages:
    9,582
    Likes Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You know it's really poor form to correct people when they have years of experience on any given subject than an armchair intellectual.
     
  9. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,135
    Likes Received:
    4,903
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok ok 35.5 million dollar ones geez Herk lol :wink:

    Yes I am a Warrant Officer but we have Commissioned guys who fly as well. I usually leave out the Warrant part not to be deceitful but because most people have no idea what a Warrant Officer is. Most people in the military don't even know what a Warrant is or what our ranks look like. Whenever I go on the main base outside of the airfield people always stare at my chest for a few seconds and sort of twitch their arms wondering if they are supposed to salute those weird looking little squares or not lol. Outside of aviation there are very few Warrants. In all of my years as a ground guy I only actually saw 2 before going Aviation.

    My MOS is actually 152H. 153A is the MOS while in flight school.

    My lack of situational awareness is hilarious. I ran out of things to talk about in the other forums and randomly clicked on this one and saw this thread today. I spent all of this time wondering what the heck that little trophy thing was on my posts for the past month lol

    Thanks for the votes everyone, I honestly wasn't expecting anything like this...
     
  10. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,135
    Likes Received:
    4,903
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Herkdriver is anything but an armchair intellectual. He actually has MUCH more real life experience in aviation than I do and his knowledge is welcomed and appreciated.

    Nothing wrong with pointing out the errors in my post. It leads to further clarification and a better understanding of the subject for those interested. :thumbsup:
     
  11. Herkdriver

    Herkdriver New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2007
    Messages:
    21,346
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    0
    USAF got rid of warrant officers, the rank, in the 1950s. The only reason I know a little about it, from the Army aviation side of it, was that I considered the option of applying for WOCS after high school. So I read up on it and went so far as talking to an Army recruiter, but it went no further than that.

    The thread was in recognition of a solid post. My comment was unnecessary and made me appear as a "know-it-all," and I am far from knowing it all. I wanted to point out the aircraft you're responsible for is a complex, technologically advanced, and expensive piece of hardware. The way I worded it was closer to a Poindexter response than a compliment, so sorry for that.
     
  12. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's not the comment, it's where you put it. It's out of place here, but would have been fine in the original thread.
     
  13. Troianii

    Troianii Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    13,464
    Likes Received:
    427
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Thanks for your service. I always found the Warrant Officer a bit odd. I get why we have them, but my command really wanted me to know the different between CWO2, CWO3, CWO4, and CWO5. My thing was what do you call a CWO2, CWO3, CWO4, CWO5? All Chief Warrant Officers. Seemed to me like it was just a pay grade thing, and that it would almost never be something I needed to know unless I found myself in dire straights and needed to know who had highest command - in which case, dude, there aren't enough CWOs that I'd find two on one raft haha.
     
  14. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,135
    Likes Received:
    4,903
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All Warrant Officers are called "Mr" or "Ms" or "Sir" or ""Ma'am". So for example if you saw a Lt. Col you would call them Colonel so and so. But if you saw a WO1 or a CW5 you would call them "Mr" or "Ms" so and so. "Chief" is also acceptable and it what most people call Warrant Officers. WO1's aren't technically Chief Warrant Officers yet but everybody calls them Chief anyway.

    But yeah WO1-CW5 is just a pay grade thing. We are all called the same thing. Kinda like how you are still called "Sergeant" whether you are an E-5 or an E-7.
     
  15. Troianii

    Troianii Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2012
    Messages:
    13,464
    Likes Received:
    427
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Actually where I was we called nearly all officers "Sir." I don't know if that's just Navy, but we never called Lieutenants LT or anything like that. Our Captain was even usually referred to as Sir.
     
  16. Nightmare515

    Nightmare515 Ragin' Cajun Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,135
    Likes Received:
    4,903
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well we call officers Sir as well. It almost seems rude to address a field grade officer by their rank rather than Sir even though I think it's acceptable to do so. Rarely will you hear somebody say "Excuse me Colonel" unless they are a higher rank or something. The majority of people are going to say "Excuse me Sir".

    Most people call Lieutenants "L.T." if they get to know them. You won't see too many Privates walking around addressing random LT's as such but if he is your platoon leader or something and you know him then they will probably call him L.T.

    Rank structure can get weird in the military as you know. Especially when it comes to Warrant Officers. We outrank enlisted and commissioned out ranks us. However, thats where the blurry line gets drawn. Most Warrants are prior enlisted E-5's and above so then it becomes a thing of who really outranks who. The book says one thing but military society says another. I've seen plenty of CW2's and E-6's rip Lieutenants apart. I've seen a CW3 rip a Captain apart (Our Captains are O-3 not O-6). I've seen a Captains rip E-8's apart. It pretty much boils down to a respect thing.

    That's why I like being a Warrant. Nobody really bothers us and we don't bother each other. Most of us are on a first name basis with each other and the higher ranking Enlisted people don't bother us and neither does Commissioned brass. It's sort of like a fraternity stuck in purgatory in the Army completely oblivious to what everyone else has to go through.

    Like an old saying goes. We as Warrants have too much rank to get in trouble for anything and not enough rank to do anything. It's a win win situation lol. We have all of the luxuries of being an Officer yet none of the stress that comes with it.
     

Share This Page