WHO warns HIV 'exploding' among gay men.>>MOD WARNING<<

MOD WARNING


Troubling but no surprise considering male gay sex allows for the easiest way to contract sexual diseases. The question is will the gay community be honest enough to admit that fact that the world's doctors have said all along.

HIV infections are rising among gay men in many parts of the world, the World Health Organization warned Friday, urging all men who have sex with men to take antiretroviral drugs to prevent infection.

"We are seeing exploding epidemics," warned Gottfried Hirnschall, who heads WHO's HIV department.

Infection rates are rising again among men who have sex with men -- the group at the epicentre of AIDS pandemic when it first emerged 33 years ago, he told reporters in Geneva.

While images of skeletal men dying of AIDS in the 1980s pushed the world to act, a younger generation that has grown up among new treatments that make it possible to live with HIV are less focused on the disease, he suggested.

Today, this group is 19 times more likely than the general population to be infected by HIV , Hirnschall said.

http://www.afp.com/en/news/who-warns-hiv-exploding-among-gay-men-urges-preventive-drugs

The problem is the far left and gay community attacks anyone who provides these facts on the ease that gay men contract AIDS because their religion of homosexuality matters more than the science.

 

Thats a sure fire thing to be proud of!

Fire up the Grill Burger King! Lets celebrate this.

 

YEP!! One of the ways to stop the spread of aids?? Monogamy--you know--as IN MARRIAGE!!!

 

Tell 'em to go to Nogales, Sonora, drink a gallon of water out of the canal, eat two handfuls of lettuce and 3 of the greasiest tacos they can find. Won't cure their AIDS but at least they'll know what their ********s are for.

 

No one is attacking people who provide these facts. They're attacking people who use these facts as an excuse to prevent them from marrying or having sex by making either of those actions illegal. That's the part that's infuriating. Simply educating people of the risks is not infuriating. That's responsible healthcare.

 

So not being married is the only thing stopping gays from being monogamous?

 

Yup. Pretty pathetic when the far left thumbs their nose at the science and function of the anal canal and pretends its a sexual organ.

 

Exactly. I would not be surprised if marriage was invented for this reason. To make disease spreading less likely.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes. And it's the same for straight people. You'd be surprised what a commitment made in front of all your friends and family will do for you. Not to mention if they adopt kids together. It's a very difficult commitment to break at that point.

 

I think being gay is natural but gay sex seems bizarre to me - but do you guys think anal sex with a woman is wrong as well ?

 

This is hilarious to me. Progressives have been at war with the idea of monogamy for decades, pushing for "alternative lifestyles", promiscuous "free love", and "open relationships", but now when they think they can advance their agenda, suddenly they claim to support monogamous relationships and marriage.

Gay men are much more promiscuous than single heterosexuals, and I doubt marriage would have a huge effect.

 

Liberals think it's a promiscuity problem among gay men afraid to come out so they engage in high-risk sex with anonymous partners in opportunistic places such as parks and rest stops and whatnot. Personally, I don't see it as a gay problem, rather a pervert problem. Some men are so desperate for sex outside of masturbation they're willing to do anything from rape to sticking it in a hole in a wall not caring if it's a man or a woman or a cow on the other side. Men in Africa, where there is less education and less moral boundaries either from religions or cultural norms, are screwing anything that moves. Mostly, they're screwing each other. And it's killing them off by the tens of thousands.

So, liberals, what will it be? Do you want to educate men on the dangers of promiscuity and high-risk sexual activity, regardless of hetero or homosexual activity; or do we just continue to provide condoms?

 

Wrong again Bill.

Having unprotected promiscuous homosexual sex carries all the same risks as having unprotected promiscuous heterosexual sex.

The 3% figure is debatable but that is another discussion. Almost 70% of people living with HIV worldwide live in sub-Saharan Africa [source] so should we just ban all sub-Saharan Africans or are you asserting that this is the fault of gays? I don't expect an answer.

Furthermore, Blacks make up over half of those new infections, followed by hispanics in the US - so you are attempting to link a minority of a minority.

He was fired but being an idiot - his job was to prevent/educate aids - not put gay people in jail. Typical bigot

I, for one, know that AIDS in the homosexual community is a huge issue, especially in younger minority populations - however - stigmatizing them for being gay will not decrease it.
Neither will bringing back sodomy laws.

An entire thread of attacks by the far left for people bringing up male homosexual sex contracts HIV more than other groups.

http://www.politicalforum.com/gay-l...testifying-gay-sex-harmful-public-health.html

Next time please do some research before denying the obvious.

 

You can be rightwing and still be gay. Just ask the "log" cabiners.

 

Where did I say different Phoebe?

 

tex? Is masturbation heterosexual or homosexual?

 

You said:

- - - Updated - - -

Never heard it asked that way. Good thought.

 

There must be something which causes the spread among homosexuals

Is simply transferring your load into the dark anal regions sufficient to cause the disease to spread?

Must blood be involved?

If homosexuals simply stick with fellatio would the spread drop?

If they won't wear condoms, then perhaps a different method of manipulating the penises should be used

 

Sort of cuts into tex's "scientific" argument against homosexuality. He claims "all sexual arousal is based on heterosexuality". Okay....then if you're sexually aroused BY YOURSELF (masturbation) and the person arousing you is the SAME GENDER as you (i.e. you).....

isn't that homosexual???

- - - Updated - - -

You should research into that, sec.

 

Every attack in that thread was attacking the idea of using the study to justify making gay activity illegal. Not attacking the study itself. Everyone knows that anal sex is riskier. Do you know that Anal sex is not limited to homosexuals? http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr036.pdf 36% of woman have reported having anal sex.

Are you aware that anal sex is not something every gay couple does? Obviously lesbian couples aren't too into it but even among gay male couples anal sex is never performed?

 

How does a guy in his 50's not even know what sexual arousal means? Masturbation is not "sexual arousal".

sexual arousal

noun
the arousal of sexual desires in preparation for sexual behavior

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sexual+arousal?s=t&path=/

Masturbation is sexual behavior. A heterosexual would be aroused by something heterosexual, not homosexual.

 

If AIDS is a "gay problem," why was it not there during the 5,000 of gay sex ? It didn't come about until the late 70's. AIDS is not a gay or straight disease. It's a disease.

 

Really?

 

you think about yourself when you whack it ? but it is giving yourself a handy, I'll admit that.

Ron Jeremy used to justify fellatioing himself as "not gay" for that very logic . Not sure I would if I could.

 

A disease which impacts one demographic at a far greater rate than others.

The fact remains that modifying ones behavior can pretty much insulate you from contracting that disease. Yes, the carriers of this disease have contaminated some blood supply's (which are now monitored) and have spread the disease through their conduct, but.....

 

The HIV pandemic should not be troubling. In this socialist revolution, HIV should be something to be celebrate and worn as a badge of honor. Everyone must learn to be tolerant and share their diseases with one another -- it's the socialist way.

Toward this end, it is former Democratic President Jimmy Carter who should be honored as the proud founder of the AIDS pandemic. Mr. Carter, for humane reasons, welcomed several thousand AIDS-infected Haitians, in conjunction with the Mariel Boatlift, to relocate to south Florida. Prior to Mariel, HIV was contained to a few harmless, isolated and remote pockets of Africa and Haiti.

The new Haitians quickly infested and infected Florida, and subsequently all of America and the world. Democrats declared it an international socialist victory -- a blessing in disguise.