As Israelis seem to claim Muslims are the cause of all their problems, I propose moving Israel, lock stock and barrel, to California. The land is not all that far from the same size, is easily big enough for 6 million people, and has a not too dissimilar climate. with lots of beach front property. There are very few Muslims there, so New Israel will be totally free from all its problems. Californians can be displaced to Arizona. Do you agree?
I for one agree to your return to the padded cell where you were fed that spoiled tomato juice. How about moving the Muslim squatters to Java, Sumatra and Borneo this is going to be most a propos (well at least it rhymes)
You do not seem to understand that what you suggest is so outlandish, so uncommon, so wild and savage to suggest moving the Jewish people from their ancestral homeland and let the crazies rule over the insane asylum they created One thing you might understand perhaps that <stoaways do not get to steer the ship>
You see, Jews seem to blame Muslims for, well, everything. Moving Israel to California would mean there were very few Muslims in the area, so Jews could live in peace. - - - Updated - - - >>>MOD EDIT Quoted Post Deleted<<< Ah, are you saying you couldn't live with a Jewish California? Bugger, perhaps Muslims aren't to blame for all Jewish problems after all.
Why would it be savage. Many Jews claim Muslims are the cause of all their problems; this way most of the people around them wouldn't be Muslim - an ideal final solution.
This is not about Muslims and Israelis. This is about Arabs !! Arabs are the cause for violence in the Middle East.
Why should there be a country for Jews? Should every religion have its own country? Maybe - but as the world gets more and more open and secular, I think that something as tribal as exclusive religion is not to be encouraged. Still, if it permits peace to the (sometime ostracized) said religious people I guess that's worth it... But the funny thing, in this case, is that nowhere in the world are Jews more at risk than in Israel. I would have proposed a Jewish city-state, much like Vatican City, in the heart of Jerusalem as the center of the Jewish faith, but that's a bit late for that, isn't it? Next best thing, then, would be a semitic confederation, with proportional representation over all of Palestine/Israel, at least to let things cool down a little - say, three generations. Of course, displaced Palestinians would have either full return rights or a generous compensation. Idem for those Jews who have been forcibly displaced.
Actually the peoples that gripe the most are the Palestinians and, there are less of them than Israelis so much easier to move them. Bonus is, the left just adores them so will welcome them in CA with open arms. I believe I just solved the Middle East problem!
When are these loony Muslims going to learn not to mess with Israel. It seems that their religion doesn't allow for tolerance, forgiveness, patience, mercy and so forth. They can't live in peace with anyone, not even with themselves. So, rather than Jews leaving Israel to the Muslims, Muslims should instead leave their maniacal religion to the devil and rejoin the human race.
Because the democratically elected guy, Mossadegh, was toppled in the favour of a monarchy that the Islamist, in their turn, toppled. Because there are enough locally-born Arabs to populate 22 countries, Why the stupid question? "own"? Ha ha ha. Rich guys own the world - certainly not Muslims. Muslims are the new Jews.
Those I have ask (or rather their relatives) said that the Arabs must pay the price for what the occident did to them. Figures. And what about the Roma? They thoo were massacred by the 3rd Reich. How about the gays? Should they have their own country too? Or what about the NA natives?
Okay, so you (or the people concerned) won't mind "the authorities" to give the Western US coast, from San Diego to Portland to the gays from all over the world and then let them expropriate the "natives" who would not be of their own sexual orientation? Might work; I far as I know Yanks, they would be peaceful enough to shut their yapper about it and quite content to be herded in intense-density, enclosed ghettoes. Heck what are we waiting for? You don't want to be called an homophobe, do you? Of course we don't - we are the guys with the white hats!
They will more than likely have to purchase at least seven percent of the land there and form a cohesive group, get permission in principal for the UN to form a nation there which of course is a problem as there is already a UN recognized nation there already and of course hold a vote with the UN. I believe you main problem will be the fact that California is a state of a recognized nation rather than a tact of land possessed by no country and so, In light of the efforts to stop states from leaving the union which precipitated the American Civil War doubt they will allow for secession.
Whatever laws these people (if you can refer to them as a "people" at all, as studies will reveal the "Californians" were, in fact, Nevadians and New Mexicans) have enacted for themselves will be largely irrelevant if the movers and shakers (let's say, the Chinese and Arabs of the future) decide to enterinate the West US Coast as the spiritual homeland of the gay.
