Structural redundancy. All buildings have it. Was Building 7 an exception? It got hit by some debris. What did that mean? The building that housed the mayor, the CIA, FBI, DOD, Secret Service, IRS had low structural redundancy? I believe the one at 1:58 is the best: [video=youtube;DDuUR7l3bgc]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDuUR7l3bgc[/video]
I can agree with the structural redundancy bit, however the thing that most strikes me about the "collapse" of WTC1,2 & 7 is the uniformity of the destruction, if some demolition company had been paid to do the job, they could very well point to this job as an example of how it gets done right. What more could you ask of a CD?
Then we agree to disagree, because in so many ways they were uniform. No CD is totally neat & tidy but the CD events of 9/11/2001 were obviously CD.
No,we DON'T 'agree to disagree',there was NOTHING in the collapses that marked a CD event..NOTHING you have,save your incredulity,proves it was. Period.
When I say I can see controlled demolition you label it my "incredulity" and you say NOTHING indicates Controlled Demolition, however, there are people ranging from retired military officers to individuals with engineering degrees ( etc .... ) who agree with me in that there are features of the "collapse" of WTC1,2 & 7 that clearly indicate Controlled Demolition. and I suppose that will get labeled an argument from authority? and so, you refuse to have agreements about anything even that we disagree about the "collapse" events of WTC1,2 & 7 ...... so be it have a nice day : )
Look carefully at the motion as its "falling down" the uniformity of descent, the fact that in the case of the towers all of the concrete was turned to dust. ( where is the documentation of large chunks of concrete? ) The destruction was so complete & total, that the workers who looked for survivors & later worked on remains recovery commented that you do not see a doorknob in the rubble, the absence of mundane bits that are found in all office buildings but not at ground zero ...... WHY?
and that is fine for you, that is why I say we can only agree to disagree. and you would deny even that much of an agreement. so be it. Thank U 4 your POV. have a nice day : )
may I then make the comparison like the blind guys & the elephant ..... perception is different depending on where you are, and my perception tells me that the official story of the events of 9/11/2001 = fraud your results may vary...... have a nice day : )
Wow, that is heavy, its like a religious dogma ( wow man my dogma been run over by a Karma) Yes, I am a sinner .... oops! oh well, let the Deity shake it all out in the end. whatever .....
So you personally have access to 100% of the evidence on the disaster that was 9/11/2001? is that it?
So what you are saying ( correct me if I B in error ) that you have seen the evidence, and are 100% convinced that ALL of the evidence points to the hijacked airliners version of events, ( did I get it right? )
