GOP Lead House Panel Clears White House on Benghazi

Well, the GOP has those other so called "scandals" to keep their base frothing at the mouth.


http://www.drudge.com/news/180947/house-panel-clears-white-house-benghazi

 

Uh..no. The partisan Deomcrats who "investigated" only convice the willfully blind, like yourself.

Is the this finding of the House Select Committee on Benghazi?

Didn't think so.

Soory, but Democrats investigating Democrats already caught LYING, NUMEROUS TIMES, is meaningless.

The other "so-called scandals"? You know who approved Fast & Furious? Tell the rest ot the nation , then.

The Obama Adm. WASN'T SPYING on US Senators? Really?

The NSA wasn't spying on random US Citizens? Is that right?

Lois Lerner PLEADED THE 5th, and then, we find out her emails, for exactly the period in question, were miraculoulsy "lost", right?

Desperacrats will believe ANYTHING they are sponnfed, as proven, once again....

 

Yup, another case of throwing whatever they can at the wall, and hoping something sticks....you'd think they'd learn.....

 

But, but, but.....BENGHAZI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????

 

As the article says in the first sentence, the House Intelligence Committee was led by Republicans.

 

You don't understand...

whenever ANYTHING "bad" (according to Grok) happens....it's the fault of "Democrats"....even if it was Republicans dishing it up to him.

 

Inb4 "RINOS!"

Our ********* friends can't handle cognitive dissonance.

 

This report is from a SMALL GROUP of DEMOCRAT withintthat Committee.

The ONLY Committee that matters, is the House Select, and the Lie-o-crats know this, but they also know how easily DUPED their voters are, as this thread proves.

I'll be sure to let you know, when the House Select Committee releases THEIR findings...you can count on it.

 

Grok, I know rationality plays no part in your thinking, but....why would Rep. Thompson lie, when if it was a lie and the Committee LED BY REPUBLICANS didn't say what he claimed...he would be called out on that lie and made to look foolish???

"Cuz he's a Democrat and they always lie"....sure, if that makes you feel better. But if I were you, I'd start working on my NEXT EXCUSE....for when that report comes out....

and YOU are left looking foolish.

- - - Updated - - -

They live by it. Orwell called it "doublethink". Same guys can BOTH be convinced to cheer and hurrah Rightwing pundits and politicians calling for Obama's impeachment......AND be convinced talk of impeachment is part of a "Democratic plot". And believe both.

 

Humm...I just checked the actual Drudge Report. This story isn't listed.

 

Google "Thompson Benghazi".....with a 24 hour Search parameter.

 

The Drudge ReTORT?

You do realize that this isn't the Drudge RePORT, right?

Walter, are you a paid poster?

 

I'll wait to see it on the only source I really trust- Fox News.

Thanks, though.

 

So it WAS the video, after all.

Sweet.

 

Among the topics covered in the 37 page letter covering the Oversight investigation from September 2012 until May 2014:

The Committee’s early attempts beginning in September 2012 to obtain voluntary cooperation from the Department
The Department’s repeated promises to cooperate, but continued failure to actually meet requests
The Department’s efforts to hide important documents behind a talking point that it had made 25,000 pages available
The Department’s wasteful efforts to cart documents in and out daily instead of turning them over to the Oversight Committee
The Committee’s eventual decision in 2013 to issue subpoenas
The State Department’s refusal to make all documents made available to and created by the Accountability Review Board (ARB) empanelled and selected by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
State Department threats to destroy Committee property necessary for internal organization of in camera documents
Abusive State Department document redaction practices
Department unwillingness to cooperatively make witnesses available
State Department efforts to selectively withhold and produce documents to support a pre-determined agency narrative
Efforts to use the Justice Department as excuse for non-cooperation
Possibly illegal efforts to retroactively classify documents to prevent their release

http://oversight.house.gov/wp-conte...-11-DEI-to-Gowdy-OGR-State-Communications.pdf

 

Maroon, macaroon, moron, all the same.

 

Is that sarcasm? Lol everyone knows Fox blacks out any stories that don't advance their narrative. There are numerous examples if you'd simply use the Google machine, but your statement suggests you probably don't like having to critically assess your beliefs.

 

Shhh, let him sleep. He's in the middle of a wack-a-doodle wet dream.

 

Does it matter where the story came from? Can you prove to me that the GOP lead House intelligence committee has NOT reached this conclusion?

No? I guess once your flavor of the month Gowdy fails as well, maybe some other superstar neocon will form a new committee and THIS TIME, reveal the truth.


http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/House-panel-No-administration-wrongdoing-in-5663509.php?cmpid=twitter

 

I'm sorry... I missed TREY GOWDY's CONNECTION with the "report" cited....?

 

Gowdy will fail to reveal to you what you want to believe. It is just a matter of time Grok.

 

Oh...so this "report" has nothing to do with the actual House Select Committe on Benghazi, or its findings?

Can you say "DUPED AGAIN" ??

Better check your emails...I'm sure the Obama Imaginary Impeachment Defense Fund $cam can use some more of your money, as well....

 

The Committee’s early attempts beginning in September 2012 to obtain voluntary cooperation from the Department
1] The Department’s repeated promises to cooperate, but continued failure to actually meet requests
2] The Department’s efforts to hide important documents behind a talking point that it had made 25,000 pages available
3] The Department’s wasteful efforts to cart documents in and out daily instead of turning them over to the Oversight Committee
4] The Committee’s eventual decision in 2013 to issue subpoenas
5] The State Department’s refusal to make all documents made available to and created by the Accountability Review Board (ARB) empanelled and selected by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
6] State Department threats to destroy Committee property necessary for internal organization of in camera documents
7] Abusive State Department document redaction practices
8] Department unwillingness to cooperatively make witnesses available
9] State Department efforts to selectively withhold and produce documents to support a pre-determined agency narrative
10] Efforts to use the Justice Department as excuse for non-cooperation
11] Possibly illegal efforts to retroactively classify documents to prevent their release

11 reasons to buy lots of tin foil...

 

It's ok Grok. There are plenty of neocons for you to support in the future once Gowdy fails to bring you Obama & Hillary being sent to prison.

 

That's why it is called 'the most transparent administration in history'. Bwaaaahahahaha.