A FEW POINTERS IN RELATION TO THE UNITED NATIONS... CONCERNING THE GOLAN(BIBLICAL BASHAN) The readers at large make it appear as if the United Nations has EVER supported Israel after November 29, 1947, and that, therefore, as if Israel OWES its member-nations something in return. The UN ignored the May/June 1967 crisis, in which Nasser, as head of the Egypt-Syria United Arab Republic, challenged Israel to war by blockading its shipping. The UN (U-Thant), in mid-May '67, released its unit, which served in the Sinai post as a buffer between Egypt and Israel, in effect signaling an "all clear" to Nasser. The UN, to this day, has found no way to allow Israel to serve on its Security Council. In 1967, Syria lost the Golan as a member of the aggressor U.A.R. Alliance. In 1973, after attacking and making some gains initially, Syria lost this territory yet once more. (One has to remember that part of the Golan Heights/Bashan of today was "Part & Parcel" of the territory of the Mandate for Palestine before 1923.) Keeping the fruits of aggression? Israel fought these two wars against Syria as the aggrieved party - not the aggressor nation, as Arab revised history evidently notes. In 1948/49, Israel had to fight the armies of several Arab nations to secure its U.N.-approved independence - also with the vaunted UN membership standing by. The Golan (Biblical Bashan) is Israeli The Syrians held the Golan Heights from day one of their Independence in 1946 until they lost it to the IDF in 1967 a total of 21 years Israel has regained/liberated the Golan Heights in 1967 [after it was illegally given away to the French Mandatory Powers (Syria-Lebanon in 1923)] to this year 2014 it totaled 47j years in Israel hands... So by sheer power of accumulated years the "Golan Height" seems to have been restored back to Israel's sovereignty. Any referendum law passed by the Knesset will hold, as did the Golan's annexation by the Begin government back in 1981 - its so-called 'legality' notwithstanding, ESPECIALLY not concerning anything the UN has to say.
So he came back, so...? I mean if he wanted to take couple of days of break from this forum so good for him, why are you trying to critisize and be sarcestic about his decisions in the real world?
