Not really sure which topic to put this thread in, it really touches on multiple topics, having to do with immigration, and primarily dealing with the U.S. We all know there was an economic bubble, with overly inflated asset prices and unsustainable spending, and then the collapse... which was followed by financial difficulties and unemployment. I would put forth that immigration was one of the primary causes of the bubble, that one cannot really fully understand what happened without looking at immigration. So a little prologue... It was two decades after the second world war and the United States was enjoying prosperity. The middle class had the most consumer purchasing power it ever had. Worker's Unions and African Americans were now demanding their rights. Ironically, it was not because things had become worse for them, but paradoxically the employment situation had improved to the point that they were now in a position to demand better conditions. Then the United States passed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which was to open the gates, so to speak. To understand context behind this change, there are several factors to consider. First, there was a sentiment that the emergency immigration restrictions passed in 1921. Second, up to this point there were racially based quotas applied to immigration, and with the whole civil rights movement, anything involving racial discrimination was seen as outdated, unjustifiable. Third, business interests were concerned about the growing influence of Unions, and sought to counter their power by increasing the supply of available labor. Lastly, employment opportunities had so much improved that the country was now ready to take in some more people. Coincidentally or not, five years and 2 million more immigrants later, the U.S. fell into a recession, with rising unemployment. There were other causes too, to be sure, rising oil prices and excessive deficit spending by the government. But the U.S. could handle this initial influx of people, because more immigrants continued to come, and the situation gradually improved. But then there was another phenomena growing: uncontrolled illegal immigration. Before, it was fairly easy to spot and deal with illegal immigrants. Besides the Blacks (who all spoke English), the vast majority of people in the country were white. Illegal immigrants began coming in greater numbers in about the 1980's, about 500,000 per year at first, but that number gradually increased. Then, starting in 2001, the number shot up, and by 2004 over 3 million illegal immigrants had come that year. The government's policy was basically to ignore the issue, intentionally underfunding immigration enforcement, and making it a policy not to go after employers who were in violation of the law, or most of the immigrants illegally residing in the country themselves. Big agricultural corporations needed cheap workers willing to do backbreaking labor in the hot sun, and big development companies wanted to pay their construction workers less. Immigration had a huge effect on the Southwest region of the country, with sprawling suburbs popping up, and fruit harvesting. The United States was running big budget deficits, debt continued to rise. The population was aging, and policy makers were wondering how the country would continue to fund Social Security for all the old people. The solution? Get a younger working population, who would provide a bigger tax base to support all the retired workers and help pay off the debt. As we all know now, however, this did not work out so well. There were not enough well paying jobs for all these additional people, and rather than helping to pay off the debt, the U.S. got into a huge amount of more debt trying to counter the unemployment problems. The old people themselves continued to work, with part of their savings wiped out, they could not afford to retire. Rather than getting a bigger younger workforce, the country got a young workforce that was vastly un- and under-employed. But all these immigrants did contribute to the bubble. The first effect of all this cheap labor was that prices fell. New homes became cheaper to build (at first). All the additional people meant that more housing needed to be built. It was not so much the immigrants themselves moving into the new housing. Rather, the immigrant communities moved into the older low-cost housing, leading to "bad neighborhoods" and "declining school districts", displacing middle class whites out into the new developments in the suburbs. This led to an increasing cost of housing, as there were fewer old houses already available on the market. Rapidly growing cities in many Southeastern states had the effect of bidding up the price of land. To some extent, there was a fear by potential homebuyers and investors that "if I do not buy now, I may never be able to afford a house". The cheap supply of immigrant labor also made available restaurant eating, housecleaners, yard maintenance, and domestic care workers, freeing many middle class parents to work even longer hours. In many regions of the country, an ever increasing number of jobs became "jobs Americans don't want to do". The idea was more good jobs would be created, leaving the immigrant workforce to do all the rest. Who could afford to work in these jobs, with the low wages and high cost of rent? In fact, it was the immigrant workforce itself leading to the low wages and high cost of rent. The working class white and black workers had been displaced, by desperate immigrants willing to work harder for less, willing to pack multiple people into overcrowded apartments. But what about all the children these immigrant workers would have? Would they too be willing to do these jobs "Americans don't want" like their parents? And what about the young children of the middle class? What type of entry level jobs would be available for them when they became teenagers and young adults? This was a bubble that had formed. It was not sustainable.
A long post which many will not read. The same ones that won't read it are the same ones that do not know history and are doomed to repeat the same old mistakes. Its going to be worse this time for several reasons. The US is now a welfare nation which provides massive benefits for Citizens and illegals alike (in fact, in some states and cities illegals get more benefits than Citizens). Mexico is also in much worse economic and political shape than in the past. Its suicide for the welfare nation to share an open border with a poor nation. Plus demographics are not on our side as it was until recently. The aging US population means fewer workers to support the growing welfare class. The slow economy, increased government interference, greater international competition, means the US economic engine is not as efficient or productive as it once was and is less able to support a massive nanny state. But none of that really matters to "progressives" since their goal is power and control. An influx of permanent lower class voters dependent upon government welfare assures progs win elections for many decades. The prog ruling class can still siphon off a lot of wealth from a poor America.
Say what you will of progressives (there is plenty to say), but it was the mentality of many of those in the Republican party that is to blame. And it is not just the American Republican party, this phenomena has repeated itself in many other developed Western countries, with their Conservative parties. It is the mentality, "what's good for business is good for the economy". Some politicians will do anything to ensure business has a supply of cheap labor. Now, there is nothing inherently wrong with that, but when you have huge numbers of people in your country who can't get decent jobs, one has to question the logic. Make no mistake, many businesses benefited from the high influx of immigrants. Cheap labor, combined with a mass middle class exodus creating demand for new homes, new neighborhoods. Overall rising cost of land, and rising rent prices from overcrowding, was good for real estate investors. If there were any costs, resulting from all these poor people who barely earned enough to take care of themselves, they could get the government to subsidize it. Rising infrastructure costs from overly congested roads, rising law enforcement costs from increased crime rates, school costs, medical costs, all these are very substantial. Likely most Americans have not an inkling how much their government actually spends on all these public services. As eluded to earlier, there was an economic ideology prevalent amongst many in the Conservative parties. I believe it is called "neoliberalism", which basically holds that open trade across borders and free movement of people is a good thing, but all that is needed is plenty of additional government regulation to solve any problems that arise. You have to understand that before you can understand why the Republican party merrily went along with what was happening. And with business profits soaring during the bubble, they had every reason to believe their economic perspective was correct. We can see the manifestation of their ideology after the crash when they called for more regulation as the solution. Now I must ask the discerning reader, do you truly believe simply more government regulation of the financial markets would have prevented the recession?? Yes, there were reckless actions on the part of certain investment banks, and blatant fraud, but to put all, or even most of the blame, on a few banks for your economic problems is simple scapegoating, I hope you realise that.
So let me get this straight. Are you saying that the collapse of the housing market and the ensuing recession was caused by immigration?
