POLL: When should the USA liberate Iran?

Iran, a clear and present threat to Humanity, is currently attempting to wriggle its way out of a war by conning the USA on nuclear issues.

The nuclear talks are destined to fail, leaving Iran with its IslamoNukes.

The time has come to lay out a timeline for action.

War against the Iranian Terrorists is INEVITABLE.

Israel will stand shoulder to shoulder with the USA when the USA attacks.

But the question is when should the attack happen?

 

every time i go into one of your polls all i see is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VdQ6oMzV2U

maybe try putting options in your polls that aren't all for people that are on your side of an issue. just a thought.

and if you knew anything about the issue you would know that america is actually trying to circumnavigate international law with all the (*)(*)(*)(*) we have been doing to Iran. They, BY LAW, have the right to have nuclear power, NOT NUKES, but power; and us interfering with them prior to them breaking any law is tantamount to the police making an arrest because you had a gun and thought about shooting your neighbor.

 

Baloney.

 

Is liberating Iran worth the lives of US-soldiers? Or is this another tactic to get a hold on the oil?

 

It seriously is only a matter of time before the US and Iran go to war. Our battalion commander told us that constantly. I bet it'll happen within 5 years, and it'll be a nasty one. Wiping their current regime off the earth might just be a necessity.

 

Iran doesn't need to be liberated anymore than Iraq needed to be liberated. But it's not about oil. Israel doesn't require a lot of oil.

 

(1) Yes, cos it would save more lives than are lost. (2) No, its not about oil, but that would be a bonus.

Iran is a clear and present danger to the USA's best friend, Israel.

- - - Updated - - -

Iran DEFINITELY needs liberating... from
1) its crazy leaders
2) its nukes

 

Encouragingly, the majority of voters want the USA to attack Iran.

 

don't forget that the OP said the following about attacking Iran:

 

Ja, ja, Guten tag.

 

Let's just say most of Iran likes its crazy leaders more than they liked the Shah, the Savak, and the U.S. and leave it at that, eh?

 

please stop trolling

 

I personally think Range my some very good points. I see you come into many of his polls and call him a troll a lot. Why are you even clicking on his polls since you hate them so much?

 

You miss something ...don't think that NATO is doing nothing about this Iranian regime, but sure we don't publish articles of the newspapers ... be patient.

 

Only an issue if diplomacy utterly fails.

I lived and served in a world where we were sure the War with the Soviets was going to happen "within 5 years". This has ultimately been true for almost all of history. One nation has almost always "almost been at war" with another since the first tribes were formed, and this will never change.

Personally, I think for all it's posturing and bluster Iran is aware that if things went this far they would be obliterated as a government. Much like Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, and many others. They simply "bait the bear" for propaganda purposes, seeing how far they can push us.

Myself, I remember the last time we came to blows with Iran. And it was not pretty, for Iran.



This very ZU-23 gun sat outside of the 3-2 Battalion headquarters for many years as a trophy.

For those that are not aware of when the US and Iran last came to blows, it was a 1 day engagement in 1988. The final result, the US lost 1 helicopter and 2 pilots (unknown reason - no battle damage found on wreck). Iran lost 1 frigate, 1 gunboat, 3 armed speedboats, and had a frigate and 2 oil platforms damaged (one subsequently abandoned).

Iran may seem crazy to our way of thinking, but they are not stupid.

 

Another one?

SMH

 

What's the difference between IslamoNukes, JudeoNukes, and ChristoNukes?

 

You won't be on the receiving end of Judeo or ChristoNukes, but we are all at risk from IslamoNukes.

 

all i know is that i will get in the bunker if rangecontraction ever gets hold of a nuke.

 

We've already got nukes in Israel and will use em on the IslamoTerrorists if they threaten our existence.

 

The Iranian people can only liberate themselves from 'their' regime. This goes for every population in virtually every nation in the world at this time.
People (in the end an entire nation) can only liberate themselves by starting to free their minds. That can only be done in one way.

By stopping to copycat information that the regime puts out via television and news sites and news papers on- and offline, and don't spread that information further online, because when this process starts, more and more people's minds will be freed (no more regime's info in minds of the Iranian people), and eventually an entire nation will be liberated without a political struggle, a civil war, riots, mass protests, revolts, a revolution and so on. And not become united when that process is going on (because the same regime can once again take advantage from that situation). Stay at home, become independent on radio, cable, energy, food, networks, etc as well)

This will be a slow process. In the mean while the 'Iranian' regime will take measures using politics, police, military, tyanny, building nuclear plants, and media and all kinds of strategies and tricks to keep the population under the thumb.

 

When should the USA liberate Iran?







Another pathetically laughable poll.

 

Iran is not a threat to humanity, only to US geopolitical goals. The US already "liberated" Iran in 1954 by installing the Shah as an autocrat. Guess what, it led to a revolution co-opted by a religious sect and now here we are. The US is the biggest threat to humanity, if anyone. Ignorant and delusional OP.

 

I always loved that description.

In reality, he already was an "autocrat". We may have urged the Shah to replace the Prime Minister, but the Shah already had that power, it was given to him directly in their own Constitution.

Written back in 1906 and 1907, one article is very important in if this is a "coup" or not:

http://fis-iran.org/en/resources/legaldoc/iranconstitution

And there are several other articles that apply, but in short they all say the same thing. That the Government of Iran serves at the pleasure of the Shah, who rules be Divine Right.

So kinda hard to call it a coup when it was really just the Shah removing the Prime Minister (which he had a right to do). Literally that would be like the President calling upon the Secretary of State to resign and calling that a coup.

 

The Shah was one of only a few decent Iranians. The Shah was not a Muslim Terrorist and so had warm relations with us in Israel. Good Muslims are 100% pro-Israel and oppose the Terrorist parts of Mohammed's Quran.

Iran is now a clear and present danger not only to the Civilized World but also to many parts of the IslamoWorld. Iran must and will be liberated, the moment the nuclear talks fail.

The world appeased Hitler and he committed the Holocaust. The USA, Israel's best ally, will kill the entire membership of the Iranian military, if that what it takes to defend Israel..

The best way that the USA can defend us is to put boots on the ground in Iran and bring back someone like the Shah. It will be a war based on heroism and morality and the US troops will be regarded as True Heroes of Civilization.