CIA Asset News Reporter Admits All News is Fake! Reporters are Bought Off!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Adz-cLDZGBU
About time the MSM journalists start standing up and tell the truth.

 

Of course they are bought off. A handful of corporations own the Western media. It's not as though newspaper proprietors physically look over the shoulders of their editors and writers and literally tell them what or what not to write. It's more the case that they know if they stray too far from the official narrative they are unlikely to have a job the following morning to come back to. Of course there are a small minority of journalists who don't toe the line but these are the kinds of journalists who are given the occasional piece tucked away on page 10. In other words, their viewpoints and perspectives are essentially marginalized and hence, under the guise of "balance", are permitted.

 

RT News? What an amazing surprise...

 

The troll brigade is out in full force.

 

This guy. I knew it was going to be this guy. Look into his background.. He's a wee bit on the goofy side and I'd take anything he says with a healthy dose of sodium chloride. Has he provided evidence to back these claims?

- - - Updated - - -

What's wrong with RT? Oh, right, you were subtly trained by other media sources a little while ago - conveniently around the time trouble started with Russia, no less - to disregard RT automatically.

 

Never heard of Operation Mockingbird I see. THis isnt anything new folks.

 

Just unusual to find it out prior to their death. The whole system is a "matrix"

 

Wait so there's a reason that while Yemen is embroiled in a civil war all fox MSNBC and CNN talk about is deflated footballs?

Or why the prince of England having a baby got 1000's of hours of coverage while the genocide of rohingya Muslims is virtually unheard of?

 

Yes, it's also why the Charlie Hebdo atrocities received wall to wall near 24 hour coverage for days on end during the same day that Boko Haram who burnt and hacked to death hundreds of Nigerian's, made two paragraphs on the bottom of page 10.

 

The truth? You can't handle the truth!!!

 

Seriously, 5 of them go off on an RT YouTube video in such a short time frame. With the stories we heard about the skill of the KGB's spying operations I'm surprised they are so blatant.

It cracks me up to hear their responses when you say something about RT. Yet there are dozens of threads completely dedicated to trying to talk doe Western news outlets, every single one. Lol

Sounds expensive for the kremlin

 

The CIA can buy me off.

5 million dollars please.

 

I was a newspaper journalist for 18 years. I can assure you that if we were being paid off, I'd be in a lot better financial shape than I was when I switched careers.

 

silly conspiracy theory

 

I guess logic is not your strength.

If all news is a lie and a fake then the story you are repeating is a lie and a fake.

Go on sit down. May take awhile to figure out what I said.

- - - Updated - - -

Well yah but you are a CIA liar so I would expect you to say that. (not to worry I am also an operative for Tonga- hey we have to make a living)

 

Anyone who believes anything coming out of the washington presstitute tabloids has got to be history challenged.

 

You still havent figured out RT is in Moscow AAAA? Start with a 4-6 yr olds "Connect the Dots" book and work your way up.

 

Excellent post. Only stupid sheep can to believe Western media. Suffice it to recall Colin Power with a test tube "chemical weapons Saddam Hussein". And the cries of the Western media. And howling herd of stupid sheep.
And also a liar international supposedly "independent" organizations. Such as the OSCE.
Do you know why the OSCE is trying to keep silent about the crimes of the Ukrainian Army? I'll tell you.
For example a spokesman (contact man) for the OSCE - Michael Bociurkiw.


Canadian citizen
Before Mr. Botsyurkiv joined the OSCE, he was journalist and - clear - actively covered the events in Ukraine
In what way was lit up - anyone can find out here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-bociurkiw/

However, much more interesting biography and "combat" the way of his father. Bogdan Rostislavovich Botsyurkiv, was born in 1925, in Galicia, an active member of the OUN, supporter and associate of Bandera. Member of punitive operations against Jews, Poles and Russian.
After the war, like the overwhelming majority punishers Bandera, fled to Canada, where in 1954 he received a degree at the University of Manitoba, Canada, and defended his thesis in 1961 at the University of Chicago on the topic: "The Soviet church policy in Ukraine: 1919-1939."
He taught political science (specializing in the policy of the USSR, the Soviet Ukraine and relations between church and state in the socialist camp) first (1956-69) at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, and later (1969-92) at Carleton University in the aftermath.
Edmonton founded the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian investigations, and in the aftermath - Institute of Soviet and East European Studies, which first headed.
Needless to say, what is examined "research centers"?
In 1983, Canada released a documentary film The Unknown Holocaust («unprecedented hunger." Ukraine 1933. 10 million victims)
It Bogdan Botsyurkiv - which is a day not lived in Ukraine, was born in Poland in Galicia, and later studied in Nazi Germany in Frankfurt - talks about how little - compared with the Bolsheviks - the Germans destroyed the churches and how much evil brought Ukraine Russian.
Hope for objectivity of the OSCE-in this context - can only naive and stupid people.
Is not it?

 

Freemarket take a breath. If as you say the media is a lie, then no one has any idea of what the truth is and that also means they have no idea of knowing what you are saying is the truth.

To believe you one must believe that everything is a lie other then that which comes from you.

So tell me how do I know you are telling the truth and not just a CIA plant trying to lie to me? Hmmm.

Its interesting. Its all a lie, except coming from you right? Really?

Get real.

Most of us appreciate that what we read in any media is distorted. It could be out and out misinformation planted by a political interest group or agency or government. It might be fabricated by its journalist or it might just be inaccurate or distorted by bias whether that bias be intentional or unintentional.

What we know is that the human brain is not perfect. It can not remember absolutely. The longer the time lapse between the actual event and its being recollected, the more likely the brain will add in things after the fact to make sense out of what it was able to remember.

We in fact remember segments of the past not the entire past, then our brains fill in the rest to make sense out of the segments we do remember.

This is why its so easy to find those gaps cross examining witnesses and why in law we have learned eye witness testimony is highly problematic and not reliable.

We also know there is a phenomena called group hysteria or group suggestion and that when one person recollects a version of events no matter how inaccurate that may be, it can be spread to others who buy into it and believe it so much so they will change their own stories that are more accurate.

All this has been tested in controlled psychology studies.

Most of us appreciate the media now limits stories to 10 seconds down from 60 seconds or even 2 minutes per story as it used to be just five years ago.

We live in an age of cell phones where people pay attention for no more than 10 seconds and those of us in our 50's or older remember 60 second commercials which are a thing of the past.

We all know written media is being replaced by cell phone and internet. No one reads newspapers anymore or listens to radio news if the news story is more thn 10 seconds. Testing of audiences has shown that. They also show few people watch tv news and when they do they only want to see stories that are not in depth and require them to think.

The media today is highly competitive and is fighting to get the attention of the same 10 second sound bite capacity memories.

To get that attention it uses two devices, violence or sex.

Violence or sex gets attention and that is why its used in headlines or the messages advertising the news.

There is no conspiracy as you say. The media is you and I. We have always been manipulated by the media.

The media is a reflection of our values and trends of the day. People use the media to try manipulate your attention to sell products.

You give the CIA a lot of credit. If it can't control Noriega, Nasser, Ghaddafi, Hussein, or Karsi what makes you think they can control the media.

Get real.

There are thousands of government and private industry units all with a mandate to access and use the media to get their message out. You can't connect the dots any more than you can sit down on a beach and count all the subes in a handful of sand.

Don't presume you know. If as you say the world is an illusion don't be so naive as to pose yourself as the messiah, the saviour, the one who is above it all and can tell the rest of us lowly primates what the universe is about.

Last time I looked yer just another ape in the tribe with the rest of us so calm down and go get a banana.

Cheers.

p.s. don't call Clark Kent a CIA agent, the man was a mild mannered reporter

 

Without having to put myself to sleep reading your draw out babbling I suggest you seek out alternative news source that are reader supported. You're welcome. Glad to help.

 

I sense a Putin-stooge here. Does not ring true.

 

I've heard of it. Seen the documents too. Have read hundreds of press articles where the author(s) explictly states that information is withheld at the government's request and have seen the documents The Intercept has put out. Having said that, why would any sane person then jump from U.S. media to openly admitted state-controlled media like RT or Press TV, which are routinely pimped. The answer is that no sane person would unless, of course, they are doing so because they're being paid to do so I.e. they spread disinformation and propaganda.

 

Ummmm what? Please post a link that RT has had to print a recent retraction on. You do realize it is a weekly occurance for the US MSM presstitutes right?
Now Germany has picked up on the NYT's / Senate tactics. Only the truly uninformed believes what they are reading coming from these oligarch owned sources.
http://rt.com/news/232963-germany-russia-tanks-ukraine/

 

RT is state-owned. You understand what being state-owned means, right? If they print a retraction it would be a concession from the Russian government. The Russian government can't even admit that it has been sending troops and weapons into Ukraine. So, you were saying...

 

You really dont know do ya?
"Here are the top twenty media corporations in the U.S. according to mediaowners.com All but two of the following, #18 and #19 are not members of the Council On Foreign Relations.


1. Time Warner Inc.
2. Walt Disney Company
3. Viacom Inc.
4. News Corporation
5. CBS Corporation
6. Cox Enterprises
7. NBC Universal
8. Gannett Company, Inc.
9. Clear Channel Communications Inc.
10. Advance Publications, Inc.
11. Tribune Company
12. McGraw-Hill Companies
13. Hearst Corporation
14. Washington Post Company
15. The New York Times Company
16. E.W. Scripps Co.
17. McClatchy Company
18. Thomson Corporation
19. Freedom Communications, Inc.
20. A&E Television Networks"