According to Steven Hawkins black holes evaporate after they run out of things to consume This is where my theory begins. when a black hole evaporates it leaves behind a singularity. With no gravity holding it in place everything that a black hole has ever consumed will come out inflating the fabric of space and time. Like making a soap bubble out of an existing soap bubble. Pretty cool trick. This process is known as big bang.this process createst a universe. The original uinverse slowly dies and a new one is made from the old Never ending cycle
You need remember that what we call a "singularity" is a fictitious location on our Cosmic Graph of the Universe, a point in the graph we have placed over the universe to reference every place we will refer to. A "singularity" doesn't exist as a thing, it is reference to graph paper ideas where one point is the location of things. We use the math of three points, (x,y,z), to indicate these locations.
Its not a cycle, since time is a human interpetation of reality. In the real reality, the Universe is was and will be all at the same "time"
Neat. Now you just have to work out the math I can see one problem in that what evaporates IS the singularity, but I'm sure you can get around that. As long as your equations are "elegant" I don't foresee a problem Neater. Again, I'm anxious to see your proof. I probably will understand it as much as a Tokamak reactor, but I still wouldn't mind having one of them either.
Time is a measurement of motion, just as is distance. Odd, isn't it, that folks rarely get caught up in navel-gazing regarding distance.
A singularity is just the point where current physics cannot describe what is happening. As a black hole evaporates, it loses mass until it is no longer a black hole, then the singularity would disappear.
But there is a singularity inside a supermassive black hole.there such a black hole at the center of our galaxy.this is what makes our galaxy spiral.
A singularity is essentially a puncture in space and time. Its infinitely small ad you can fit infinite amount of matter in it. A scientist disproved Hawkins that black holes simply evaporate. The laws of physics state that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Everything that the black hole consumed has to go somewhere after the black hole evaporates losing its mass. With no mass holding it together, the singularity unravels.
Yeah, some of the philosophy of the Hindus believed something like that. Funny how some of these religious ideas of Hinduism and other religions describe what some scientific theories today are talking about. But perhaps they were more like Einstein who said his understanding came more from intuition than anything else. Intuition may be the key to understanding, a way the human brain gets in contact with a field of knowledge that is non local.
Can you prove it doesn't? Time and space exist a priori, that is before everything else. A thing must exist at a certain time and in a certain place so positing there is no time is counterintuitive and asking for a negative proof is appropriate. With full rigor please, or your Nobel may be delayed.
Understanding that Energy which is weightless and does not require Space/time to contain it, we can see that the disappearing matter is channeled down a Black Hole. It all becomes Energy again, as it was before the Big Bang materialization. This explains the Dark Energy phenomenon, too. The Black Holes are channels for matter to convert back into Energy and represent that as a value for Dark Energy.
But why does energy not require Space/Time? The energy must still be someplace in the Universe and it must be there at a certain time, yes? That is part of anything's description, weightless or not. It must be here or there, and now or then but never both of either. Again, you can do this but it is counterintuitive, so the proof will likely be mathematical only
Energy experiencing Time is called Power. Power is not Energy, but the use of energy. E/t = P Energy must exist outside of time because as soon as it becomes active we can measure it expenditures.
Proving something does not exist, must start with a position that points to the fact that it does. You have yet to made such a case.
