The weak willed and beta progressive ideology believes it is up to non blacks to be appreciative, inclusive, and apologetic for black crime, culture, and their inability and unwillingness to assimilate. I say, BS ! If blacks want respect, they need to earn it. It is they who need to stop gangs, drug use, crime, and thug culture in their community. Idiotic slogans like "Black lives matter" and "Race together" and black history month are embarrassing concepts. >>>MOD EDIT Rule 2 Removed<<< And the nation has clearly rejected progressivism and the excuses for and by the thug black culture. As a liberal, I believe we need more Ben Carsons and less Al Sharptons.
So long as you continue to separate people in to "us" and "them" along racial lines there is always going to be discrimination. Stop generalizing and stop discriminating.
What have you done to eradicate gangs, drug use, crime and la cosa nostra/yakuza/tongs in (insert your race here)? These problems are not exclusively black. Some of them may have their roots in economic status. I seriously doubt that criminality is caused by race. Holding each individual responsible for the actions of all others in the same group seems ridiculous on its face. It's one of the concepts used to justify genocide. You might want to rethink your approach. Or admit to burning crosses, which seems to be the alternative. I will agree we could do with fewer race baiters. It seems to me, however, that you are just baiting from the opposite direction from Sharpton.
Your threads are just the same old racist babble over and over and over. Please show us where anyone says whites are suppose to be apologetic for crimes committed by black folks. Your right black folks do need to fight to stop many of the criminal elements in some of our communities, but how about you help out also by not bringing the guns and drugs into these communities. Yea 50 yrs ago many racist wanted less Dr. King and Malcolm X also. - - - Updated - - - You must be scared it is going to take away from the lazy, privileged status that you hold.
lazy privelaged status? I come from a Hard working community that is wealthy because we worked, saved and invested our money. Live modestly. Value education. dont have children out of wedlock and reject crime. yours is one that sits on welfare,spends all their money on flash goods, lives beyond their means, ignores education, has children out of wedlock and embraces crime. change your ways. The biggest racist here is YOU and your posts on Martin/Zimmerman proved this beyond doubt.
The racism all comes from the left. Like trying to convict Zimmerman with no evidence merely because he is white and Martin Black. Only in the loony world of the left does being a racist make you not a racist.
Hmmmm, lazy privileged status. What is that exactly? Whoop dee do, you haven't done anything nobody else hasn't done. I don't have any children out of wedlock and I reject crime. Sorry Jack, I don't fall into any of the above categories. To what? Right, but you are ripping off the racist right wing speech too me. The Zimmerman Lovers are the ones who prove to be the racist for the simple fact had Trayvon been a white, unarmed 17yr old teenager you would be calling for Zimmerman's head on a pike.
Had Trayvon been a white kid in the same situation then he would have deserved what he got in the same way. I hate white thugs too. You are racist for the simple reason that you think its acceptable to attack someone for lawfully following you at a distance. About time we did have such a thing and get rid of the racism amongst black people .
That's an easy statement to make until we see a white teenager in that situation. Never seen anyone label white criminals "thugs" on this forum. Yea that makes me a racist. How do you lawfully follow someone from a distance when you can't see them? Racism amongst black folks is not the problem.
You had NO problem making the opposite statement I'm British. Thug means just that here. there is no racial connatation. You see where they went and follow. Its lawfull. What isnt lawful is just to attack someone who follows you as you well know. Yes it is.
Because its the truth. We are not in Britain. How many unarmed teenagers do you follow around the neighborhood with a loaded weapon. Me? None. No it isn't, its dealing with racist.
No its your utterly unproven assertation We are on the internet DUH where did you think 'we' were? Im Neither American no in the USA. I speak English the language of my people...The English you dont get to define my language for me. Nor me. Its why I am glad we have volunteers who will do this for me. Actually I live in a gated estate so the security guards would throw out and Trayon types Wrong again.
It embarrasses you if I say that the lives of people who are black matter? A man who happens to be black has no more responsibility for stopping a criminal who happens to be black, than white people are accountable for what Bill Clinton does with his cigar. Recognizing that doesn't make the life of a man who happens to be black not matter.
I place the question to the board, (not to Sab, I know his answer) If Zimmerman had been black and Martin white, would Zimmerman have walked free? And okay, I will ask Sab, would you have supported Zimmerman as much as you did in this reality as in the one where he was black?
So you have an idea of what a good black is and what a bad black is, and you want a black to know this and abide by it. What is a black?
What is a minority? Is it a lazy? Is it a violent? How is that not the most hypocritical expression of entitlement?
History tells you a lot. Kansas. I kind of figured out you weren't in the USA when you said you weren't American. I didn't think I tried to. Oh the black kids. Right again.