http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/...-new-york-city-approved/#sthash.LM5UKyFT.dpuf The gun prohibition folks felt the need to ban a modern sporting rifle, and they coerced the birth of the "featureless" AR-15. It is still an AR-15, but looks different. Just as capable as any "regular" AR-15, but untouchable by the "assault weapon bans" in the country because to looks different from a "regular" AR-15. How do gun prohibitionists feel about the ban-proof AR-15?
Once again, someone talks like they are experts on assault style weapons. using words like prohibitionist. Another fear mungering, know it all. trying to spread their childish fears.I dont fear someone taking my guns.because i know the truth.and it will set u free!
Once again, someone talks like they are experts on assault style weapons. using words like prohibitionist. Another fear mongering, know it all. trying to spread their childish fears.I dont fear someone taking my guns.because i know the truth.and it will set u free!
The truth is that if it were not for pro gun organizations the fight for us, and constituents that vote and hound their representatives in congress with letters, calls, and emails, we would have succumbed to the never ending attack on our gun rights.
there is no assault weapons ban in this country, other than your mind! only ban i see is the one on your intelligence!
There's nothing to stop the "good guys" from putting a loaded drum mag on it and taking out 60 people in 60 seconds. Changing it cosmetically doesn't make it less dangerous.
why did they change the sights? don't the stabdard AR-15 sights work on this? also, looks like it has a heat shield, which is illegal in NYC. but legal in the rest of the state, for a semi-auto rifle.
oh, I see. lower sights were required due to the shotgun-type stock. and i read in the article that the NYPD Rifle-Shotgun division has approved this gun. maybe i'll buy one.
Other than "good guys" don't do that. Yet another specious premise, eh Pardy? No, it just makes it legal. Laws based on emotions and ignorance like the AWB are irrational and absurd.
I'm sure the criminals that keep finding themselves in front of judges feel like good guys, right? Gang bangers too?
For liberals, there can be no such thing as bad and good guys. That speaks to being discriminating in thinking and one cannot discriminate so if there are no good guys, there are no bad guys, only victims of the good guys; therefore, the good guys are not actually good guys but oppressors.
You said "There's nothing to stop the "good guys" from putting a loaded drum mag on it and taking out 60 people in 60 seconds" -- not "There's nothing to stop those who think they are "good guys". Freudian slip, eh Pardy or are you like the others on the left who have difficulty with knowing good from evil?
What you know is highly questionable. Your posts display a significant lack of knowledge, and even basic understanding what politics in the united states. They are devoid of even an effort at grasping the realities of the nation you choose to live in.
Except for the fact that there is and are. The states of California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and the district of columbia, all outright prohibit the ownership of firearms they deem to be "assault weapons" based on certain cosmetic features, that on no way effect how the firearm operates. Disprove it. - - - Updated - - - Except for the character of the user themselves. Then you recognize that there is no legal basis for these prohibitions to exist in the first place. - - - Updated - - - Such as idiotic politicians who insist on banning commonly owned firearms on the basis of appearance.
Oh boy. you need to spend enough time on the forum to learn that there really are experts here, who speak from a knowledge base that took a very long time to acquire. If you'll settle down a little and pay attention, you'll find that there's a whole lot to be learned from us.
the better solution is for the courts to get rid of Cuomo-idiocy and then voters should ban anti gun politicians from ever holding any office again
that's because you don't have any guns to take. Its like my wife saying she doesn't wear a cup when she does TKD because she doesn't worry about someone kicking her in the balls - - - Updated - - - well there really are not assault weapons. You see the term "assault" as applied by military strategists requires select fire and graboids use the term 'assault' to mean a criminal attack on someone/ But CT, NJ and Kalifornia ban guns that dishonest morons like Feinstein call "assault weapons" - - - Updated - - - so why are you in favor of all those stupid anti gun owner laws when you admit that someone willing to commit mass murder isn't going to obey a gun law if they don't care about committing massive cases of capital murder? why are you so terrified of honest people owning guns? do you engage in behavior that would make you a target of honest armed citizens?
