Why is it financially impossible for the us government to have landed on the moon in

The most important part is that the government spent 4,031,176,192.61 on science and technology yet it costs a total of $21.04 B for the Apollo 11 mission. To take into the considerations, it is impossible for them to have saved it up and the money came solely from the government according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11.

1969 value of dollars
25.4 B Cost of Apollo space program
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/18660...

140 B, 128 M federal revenue
total revenue from 1962-1969:
$572,432,080,000
total spent on science and technology:
4,031,176,192.61- How????
http://federal-budget.insidegov.com/l/71...

total cost of 1969 Apollo mission
$21.04 B
http://www.asi.org/adb/m/02/07/apollo-cost.html

May 18, 1969 – May 26, 1969
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_11

total Apollo budget 7.76 billion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_10

It would of taken the US Government approximately 53 years to pay the finances with their given expenditures.

Update: they started-ended the space race(ending on the moon landing) in 1957-1969 and they made about 3329667600 every year; if they collected this money every year, placing it all in the program, it would still be impossible for it to have happened that is what I mean by "saved"

Update : I forgot to mention that adjustment to the money was made from inflation, for many sources adjust the value to the current worth-I used an online tool

 

You actually think the space program started from scratch on every apollo mission?


And you honestly think the contractors involved didn't bear part of the cost involved hen the technology being developed had countless uses other than the space program?



Massive fail on your part

 

The moon missions were shown to be a hoax a long time ago.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=144487

 

No .they were NOT,at ANY time

 

No I do not think that, perhaps if you've been more attentive when reading my post you'd have a better understand; anyway to clear you obvious confusion, whether your ambiguity was startled either from carelessly misunderstanding the second sentence or if you don't understand that money allocated for the space program, cited in my evidence, was an immediate request, Mod edit: Oops. One sentence too many.

 

You actually think they spent money they had?...And despite your clumsy attempt at an insult,I didn't miss a thing in your ill informed post.


And you actually think we aren't still paying for some of the program?


Besides,The space review notes that the US has spent 486 billion in 57 years of human spaceflight http://www.thespacereview.com/article/1579/1


More fail on your part

 

I shouldn't of reacted that way I was feeling bad that night, sorry.

The money came directly from the government if that is what you meant; if not refer to response 3.

Anyway, I didn't completely elicit all the information; thus, 0.28338461538 trillion was spent in 1960, in terms of debt, and .0.2304 trillion was spent in 1969, a substantial amount by the way coming to 53.38461538 Billion dollars that they paid off in that time span. Then How did they pay it? http://federal-budget.insidegov.com/l/62/1960

It doesn't matter how much they spent on the space program altogether but how much money they had at the time and how much they needed to pay for the program- being 20 billion at the year of 1969.

 

You had a right to ask "And you actually think we aren't still paying for some of the program?", as I didn't elicit evidence. However, in response to the question "And you honestly think the contractors involved didn't bear part of the cost involved hen the technology being developed had countless uses other than the space program?" I had in the first post that it was solely funded by the government.

 

I dislike your quick assessment on my failure. You should ask the questions you don't understand then once of understanding declare that my post is incompetent; otherwise, you're making accusations based on emotion, which leads to inaccurate conclusions. God Forgive the people who actually believe in terrestrial religion.

 

((53*x)+D/ (53*x)+E) - ((53*(1-x))+I)/((53*(1-x))+N) = 53

interpretation of this equation would be:

((53*the percent that went in our debt 1960) + the debt / (53*the percent that went in our debt 1960) + the national income) - ((53*(the percent that was spent by their own money 1969))+debt)/((53*(the percent that was spent by their own money 1969))+N) = 53

result:


(((.53000*x) + 0.2304) / ((53*x) + .141280000)) - (((53*(1-x)) + 0.2833846153 / ((53*(1-x)) + 0.3360706153) = 53
solve for x

x = x = 1.63222
meaning .63222 was spent in 1960-1969
and 0.36778 was placed in national debt between those years.

Then 0.052686(the money they spent between the years)


.74340+0.052686/.141280000+0.052686 or .74340/.141280000 = .19 ACTUAL, .63222 MY CALCULATION

Unless you can prove a fallacy in any of my premises and the calculations, you are wrong.

 

We went SIX times,the landing sites heve been imaged by the lunar observer spacraft.



Period,despite your blizzard of numbers

 

I alleged that the U.S Government committed fraudulence, any empirical evidence cited by them can't be taken into sole consideration. You must first consider the latter possibility; by eliminating it you'll then be able to support your argument. Thus your forced to attempt an understanding of my mathematical analysis or you could undermine one of my premises; otherwise, your argument fails to provide efficacy.

 

Answer: "Big Ass Credit Card" (one that we are still paying off to this day...)

 

I suppose you just decided not look at my other posts with a argument opposing that accusation.

 

You really don't understand how the real world works,Do you?

 

Not only did we not go to the moon, but we never sent rovers to mars. It's all one huge lie to make us think science works.

Now, Apothesis is set to impact the earth in 2036 and I sure hope that our space travels allows us to divert it, for otherwise the west coast could be scrubbed clean, by the wrath of apothesis. I sure hope validation boy is alive when that happens. LOL

 

How about you respond to my argument??? Not sure if that matters to any more does it?