Whoever shot Tippit they shot in extreme anger, fear and violence. Was Officer Tippit sent to murder Oswald and then Oswald sensing the danger he was in shot in self-defense? Was Tippit supposed to silence Oswald and then when he failed the conspiracy turned to Ruby as a Plan B alternative? Anthony Summers raise these questions in his book Conspiracy. http://www.famously-dead.com/images/jd-tippit-7.jpg http://jfk.deeppoliticsforum.com/morningstar/crux2.jpg
I never got the connection of Tippet to JFK other than that it occurred just after the assassination. The shooter's ID didn't match...the bullets were all wrong. The whole thing was just bizarre
And please explain why they couldn't match the bullets to the gun conclusively Why there were shell casings found at the scene when Oswald supposedly shot Tippit with a revolver (that doesn't eject shell casings) Why there were thee bullets in Tippit from one manufacturer and one from another Why there were TWO shell casings from one manufacturer and two from another? Curious minds
Yes they did match the bullets to his gun conclusively. It is normal and not the least unusual for people to buy more than one type of ammo and even sometimes mix them. It is also normal to empty spent casings after firing a revolver and then reloading
Yes they did match the bullets to his gun conclusively.They absolutely did not It is normal and not the least unusual for people to buy more than one type of ammo and even sometimes mix them. HUH? No it's not. You ever shoot a gun? It is also normal to empty spent casings after firing a revolver and then reloading On what planet? He supposedly just shot a cop and only used four of the 6 bullets his gun held. He's going to stand around and reload when his gun isn't empty?
They absolutely did match the bullets and shell casings to his gun conclusively. Whatever movie you saw simply lied about that point. Yes it is normal and i have already conclusively proven you are the one massively ignorant about guns.' You were badly crushed in our exchange about the first shot and the mounting of the scope and many other details. Yes it is normal to buy more than one type of ammo. Many people might compare different brands and types and have some left over from range sessions and load all sorts of different mixes of types it is very common and not the least bit unusual. Yes it is not abnormal at all to empty and reload spent bullets immediately after firing especially if one wishes to keep a weapon fully loaded in anticipation of needing it again. You are asking meaningless empty questions and demonstrating massive ignorance - - - Updated - - - Of course he was shot in fear and violence. He was stopping the man who had just murdered the president and who did not wish to be arrested. No evidence of such idiotic nonsense that tippet was sent to murder oswald.
And Ruby, an associate of Sam Giancano shot Oswald because he was a big JFK fan who was upset about the assassination, right?
No evidence was ever shown that Ruby was associated with Giancano or any other mafia figure. YEs that is basically his stated motive for shooting Oswald which we know he did. WHen a man admits to a crime and takes full responsibility for it as Ruby did it is fairly credible to believe his motive
We discussing what Rudy said about himself not what the government said. Conspiracy theorists such as yourself always resort to such ad hominen when facts do not agree. The truth is you do not have the market cornered on distrusting the government or holding it accountable. You are also not more enlightened. You simply refuse to address evidence and cling to a faith
And you, for some strange reason inject yourself at every turn as a supporter of all official government positions which have been attacked over the last five decades. What kind of a nut does that? It is as though you have spent your whole life defending shady bull crap stories served up by corrupt officials. at every turn. A U.S. Senate Commitee did an extensive investigation which came to the conclusion that there was a conspiracy involved in the murder of JFK and that Ruby had been associated with Chicago mob boss Sam Giancana as well as Dallas mob boss Jack Civello.
No that is quite false I do not defend all official government positions what I do is expose conspiracy theories for what they are. Just because conspiracy theorists are die hard and spend decades failing to challenge the official investigation does not lend them any credibility. No in fact there was no such senate investigation or committee sorry. No evidence ever linked Ruby to any organized crime figure. In fact the rumors surrounding his connections lead back to him. He was a self promoter who liked to make himself out to look bigger and more important than he really was.
Once again you ignore we were not discussing what the government said about Ruby's motive but instead what Ruby said about his own motives. Rather strange he confessed and took full LONE responsibility for his crime. On those rare occasions when people do this it is normal to believe their motive but because his motive ruins conspiracy theories you have to grasp at straws and dream up ulterior motives without a speck of evidence.
Fine.Post a link that shows they matched those mismatched bullets to Oswald's dun. Didn't happen. As far as your nonsense about reloading a revolver that isn't empty after killing a cop and after shooting the President...that's just insane.
No little one. You made the first assertion you back it up. There is nothing insane about reloading a nearly empty revolver when you are fleeing arrest and are willing to use it. This merely shows you are ignorant about firearms and desperate to create mysteries where none exist.
Ruby did not murder Oswald from a spur of the moment impulse. He stalked Oswald for several days. This stalking shows pre-meditation, planning, and malice aforethought. Ruby, by the way, was linked to Carlos Marcello, the New Orleans crime boss. G. Robert Blakey, chief counsel for the House Select Committee on Assassinations from 1977 to 1979, sees it differently. He says: "The most plausible explanation for the murder of Oswald by Jack Ruby was that Ruby had stalked him on behalf of organized crime, trying to reach him on at least three occasions in the forty-eight hours before he silenced him forever." ---- Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Ruby
Ruby was never linked to any organized crime figure including Marcello except through sheer rumor. That counselors explanation is ludicrous and not reasonable. Ruby explained why he murdered Oswald and whether it was premeditated or not. He did not exactly stalk Oswald he hung out in the police station where Oswald was held but this was common for Ruby to do. Ruby was a well known fixture in that police station. His actions immediately before Oswald's shooting makes it very clear it was an impulsive act. In fact no other reasonable or logical explanation exists. It well known and proven Ruby was at Western Union only MINUTES before the murder of Oswald and had to wait in line. This is not a plausible act for someone planning murder with an extremely narrow window of opportunity.
Sweet trolling, but you ignore the video documentary record! [video=youtube;_JehEBfElhA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JehEBfElhA[/video] [video=youtube;kYgJy98doaI]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYgJy98doaI[/video]
I did not ignore it. It is simply irrelevant and does not contradict the facts I posted. The first video simply shows him at the police station which as I pointed out was a very common place for Ruby to hang out and so does not constitute stalking. The second video cleverly edits a live interview at his trial with unsourced quotations which Ruby did not speak or utter in the interview. The is a very common trick with conspiracy theorists who have no evidence and so role out fictional youtube entertainment and call it evidence or " documented " Ruby went to his grave denying a conspiracy he acted alone and that is that
