http://louderwithcrowder.com/shaun-king-threatens-attack-cities/ So, here is a white guy in black face, leading blacks into the black neighborhoods to burn them down, fight with cops that are mostly black, in cities with the highest population of blacks, usually ran by blacks. Can someone please get this through their heads that BLM is just the lefts way of having blacks do their dirty work for them like they did with black soldiers in the civil war?
One of the links in the article says his plan is for economic boycotts. I happen to support this and find it far more productive than protesting. My only concern is will there be enough discipline among the participants to help make the plan last as long as necessary.
he likes to make up hate crime stories to further his agenda i see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaun_King_(activist)
In an official announcement on The Tom Joyner Morning Show, King said that the project, which he has dubbed Injustice Boycott, will aim to force the progressive cities to meet local activists’ demands regarding police brutality. And if those demands are not met within 43 days — by Martin Luther King Jr. Day — King says that he will activate more than 200,000 people, according to his estimate — to level a four-prong attack on commerce and government. Strange way to describe a boycott.. Btw when is that word going to be deemed offensive?
This is a New York Times front page story. Have they been notified they have to be involved in this one.
Yes.... what an amazing source of a person with an amazing personality. Really. How on earth are you able to dig up the dumbest news of the day?
http://www.injusticeboycott.com/ 2 second google search.. Can you atleast attempt to discuss the topic? We will begin a full tourism boycott of those cities. To protect small businesses, we will also announce a comprehensive plan for ways you can support local entrepreneurs to get them through the boycott. We will begin a comprehensive divestment plan where we ask people to pull their money out of banks, financial institutions, and investment plans which we have determined either directly support racial injustice and police brutality in those cities or have chosen to remain silent in the midst of this national crisis. We will give some of those financial institutions an opportunity to publicly endorse the reasonable reforms of local activists before we publicly announce our divestment plan. We will announce a targeted national boycott of large corporations headquartered in those cities that have either directly supported injustice there or have remained painfully silent in the face of it. Willful ignorance is no excuse. We will give those big brands and corporations an honest chance to publicly endorse the reasonable reforms of local activists before we publicly announce a boycott of them. We will begin creatively disruptive protests in those cities designed to inconvenience and shut down both commerce and government work.
So you dismiss what was said because of who said it? Its amazing how stubborn you are to see the truth right in front of you. Shaun is going to use blacks and on a day of celebration of one of the most peaceful republican black activists to start economic riots in mostly black owned areas, that will mostly hurt black business owners.
The link in the article explains his plan in further detail. Boycotts won't be deemed offensive because they exist to demonstrate that offense has already been taken and the boycott is the reaction to that offense .
1) This isn't about riots and 2) MLK day is a good as day as any seeing that even he led a boycott. Particularly the Montgomery Bus Boycott.
Black Lives Matter is merely a recruiting tool for the KKK. All they have to do is air footage of the riots. The democrats are returning to their "roots".
If he will actually boycott anything that will help his cause. Will he lead a boycott of calling the cops when murders happen? Or is he going to boycott the local small businesses of blacks in their community?
Not sure of what he'll do regarding whether or not to call police if he needs them. Now that I think about it, part of the boycott could be of the police. He could host drives to get people of the community enrolled in the police academy. And no, it would seem weird for him to boycott black businesses. Per his plan, he'll have participants divest from certain silent businesses.
Tourism boycott? Does that mean they will stop bussing in agitators to start riots in places like Ferguson and St Louis? Whats funny about this is that according to Dave Chappelle, blacks don't trust banks already and don't use them much as it is. See his reparations skit. But anyways, we are talking about the criminal element of the black community, highly doubt there is much investments or bank usage for the dirty drug money. And are the professional sport stars really going to be keeping their millions just laying around their homes? Again, let me point out that the left is planning a boycott of leftist cities where most of the shootings are occurring, and plan on boycotting the same leftist businesses which support those leftist politicians, while calling the right "racist" and never electing republicans for fear of losing their welfare checks. Where is my Michel Jackson meme of him eating popcorn and watching how this comedy is going to go down?
Most of the shootings have been by black cops. Yeah, I see the other article. I fully support him shopping small. Wonder how far their paychecks are going to go without the discounts the big businesses can provide. Those big businesses which employ the majority of blacks.
Where is the source that supports these claims? I looked to confirm before responding and found nothing. Meanwhile, the media depicts white cops killing citizens.
Here is the study. I should have said "proportionately". http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/11/1...nfairly-target-black-suspects-study-says.html The paper is in the story.
Porpotionality makes little difference though. And even then proportionality is only a factor after controlling for so many variables. But for the sake of argument, let's say white officers are killing less bottom line. The stories being exploited here are the interracial stories not the black cop- black suspect stories. It's best to deprive the media of race-based narratives. Community officers for the community.
I agree. The news, liberal news especially, inflames race based stories to provoke an uproar in liberal cities by liberal blacks following a white guy in black face. And people always wondered how black slaves could and would fight for the confederacy during the civil war.
Wasn't participation in the Confederate army a bit different? They were teased with freedom after all. Other than that, this ordeal does smell like a fundraising scam too...
They are being promised "freedom" here too, from a fictional oppressive system that can never be quantified or claimed.
