+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: FBI Director: No Evidence That Donald Trump Or RNC Were Successfully Hacked

  1. #21

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toddwv View Post
    Let's say it together: Both parties were hacked.

    So why wasn't the dirt on the Republican side leaked? What does Putin have locked up in his man-sized safe for later use? Maybe he's using it now which is why we're going to have a Trump cabinet stocked full of russophiles...

    I hope that the GOP "patriots" of the House will look into Donald Trump's tax returns and ask why they are sealed from the public's view.
    Well then, you disagree with the FBI.

  2. Likes vman12 liked this post
  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toddwv View Post
    Let's say it together: Both parties were hacked.

    So why wasn't the dirt on the Republican side leaked? What does Putin have locked up in his man-sized safe for later use? Maybe he's using it now which is why we're going to have a Trump cabinet stocked full of russophiles...

    I hope that the GOP "patriots" of the House will look into Donald Trump's tax returns and ask why they are sealed from the public's view.
    What dirt?

    Just because the DNC is rotten to the core doesn't mean the RNC is.

    We know this because the DNC wasn't going to allow the American voter to nominate Sanders. The DNC process was pure theater.

    On the other hand, the RNC allowed the American people to choose their own candidate, even though many in the RNC couldn't stand the idea of Trump as the nominee.

    Thats pretty much all you need to realize.

    Of course, the RNC also allowed the FBI to evaluate their servers and security. The DNC did not. Now we know why.

  4. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Mello Guy View Post
    As you all love to remind us, no evidence of s hack doesn't mean one didn't occur. Or are you now conceding our intel agencies CAN tell that the Russians were behind the DNC hack?
    No, Hillary swore over and over and over that she had not been hacked, which is absolute bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Now the liberal loon message is Russia help Trump win the presidency which is just more lying bull(*)(*)(*)(*) from butt sore losers

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by SiNNiK View Post
    Technically there is no proof the DNC was successfully hacked either.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/poste...lection-hacks/
    Not according to the left wing loons, it is the only reason Trump win according to the sore losers.
    Cheney was the second executive from the White House to shoot someone in the face, Clinton was the first

  5. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by perdidochas View Post
    Its amazing to me that with the supposed technology gap, with all the high tech wonders supporting the dems, that the RNC managed to have more secure systems than the DNC.
    The democrats will continue telling their lemming followers about how uneducated white Trump voters are, but the reality is, these self aggrandizing loons only look more and more ignorant everyday
    Last edited by BroncoBilly; Jan 11 2017 at 12:54 PM.
    Cheney was the second executive from the White House to shoot someone in the face, Clinton was the first

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve N View Post
    What dirt? Has it ever occurred to you that conservatives aren't corrupt scumbags? Or do you just assume that because liberals are then everyone is?
    But conservatives are corrupt scumbags...

  7. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ctrl View Post
    You assume that the rnc is as corrupt as the dnc firstly, and there was dirt to dump. Secondly, if the goal was to prevent a hostile Clinton from being president, it would do no good to damage whoever was on the other side. Unless of course it was a McCain or a Graham...
    And yet one of the first things the House does is gut the independent ethics committee.
    2016: The Russian Invasion of the White House is about to begin as Дональд Trump turns the White House into the Red House

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Borat View Post
    Don't you find the idea that the Russians easily hacked the DNC servers but didn't hack incompetently maintained and virtually unsecured Hillary's servers with all those classified state secrets on them a tad unrealistic?
    It's quite obvious really. Someone's private server is not expected to contain anything useful to a government sponsored hacker whereas a political server has higher value to a government sponsored hacker hence the majority of the cost and time is dedicated to attempts to hack a political or government server. Put another way; would a hacker be more interested in a town council server or The Pentagon server. It also was not widely known that Clinton had a private server.
    Mainly here to comment on hypocrisy

  9. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toddwv View Post
    And yet one of the first things the House does is gut the independent ethics committee.
    Not evidence of wrongdoing. More likely a fear that as democrats have no real power, they will abuse the unfair rules of the ethics comittee to falsely accuse republicans of crazy (*)(*)(*)(*), hoping to gain some seats through slander.
    For any constraint within a system, there are an infinite number of potential corrections.

    Quote Originally Posted by mngam View Post
    I read that Zimmerman may change his name to Benghazi so the media will leave him alone.
    Quote Originally Posted by zbr6 View Post

    ...cause panties.

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by truth and justice View Post
    It's quite obvious really. Someone's private server is not expected to contain anything useful to a government sponsored hacker whereas a political server has higher value to a government sponsored hacker hence the majority of the cost and time is dedicated to attempts to hack a political or government server. Put another way; would a hacker be more interested in a town council server or The Pentagon server. It also was not widely known that Clinton had a private server.
    Puhlease, the Russian secret services hacked the DNC and the RNC and god knows who else but they had no clue whatsoever that Hillary was using her private server for her official state department communications. She really fooled them, they thought she used it for wedding planning and yoga classes, right? lol

    Dude, The idea that the Russians wanted to help Trump to beat Hillary but neglected to hack her private server looking for dirt (even if they were too stupid to figure out what it was really used for) is beyond absurd. Do you yourself believe this nonsense or do you just expect us to?
    Populism is a political style of action that mobilizes a large alienated element of population against a government seen as controlled by an out-of-touch closed elite that acts on behalf of its own interests.

+ Reply to Thread
+ Post New Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: Mar 18 2016, 08:31 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: Jan 02 2016, 09:58 AM
  3. Replies: 32
    Last Post: Dec 27 2015, 01:14 PM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: Oct 22 2015, 07:51 AM
  5. FBI Report: No Evidence that George Zimmerman is Racist!
    By northwinds in forum Current Events
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: Jul 14 2012, 12:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks