Seems like the collective is full of McCarthites these days. First the Russians dare oppose The Obama in Syria, and now they "hacked the election", robbing Hillary of her rightful place. How should we as American's respond?
The US will not earn billions waging war with Russia, and Hillary's presidency is not that important. But okay, cyber war we could always do the same as the economic one. We could constrict them economically giving them just enough air to breath and to survive.
We should acknowledge the fact that it happened and take steps to prevent it in the future, which is what Trump is proposing. We should sanction them as far as any new computer developments go. There isn't much we can do beyond that, but that doesn't mean we should give them a medal since they helped our side win, which is what a lot of the Trumpistas seem to want
Well the most appropriate thing would be to hack Putin's embarrassing information and release it to the world. The most entertaining thing would be to tie Putin and Trump's private parts together and make them fight polar bears to the death armed only with their evil synergy.
These people? [video=youtube;0diJNybk0Mw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0diJNybk0Mw[/video] [video=youtube;UYOy1tuVv3w]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYOy1tuVv3w[/video] [video=youtube;ZIpkdusnIkE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIpkdusnIkE[/video]
What if Putin and the Russians aren't totally corrupt Like Hillary and the DNC? HEY EVERYBODY!!! American hackers find out that Putin likes his mom's spaghetti in hacked e-mails!!! The problem with the establishment worshipers is that they are more mad the DNC got caught being corrupt then they are the DNC being corrupt. It takes a corrupt person to turn a blind eye to corruption and say "that's cool". This is why I have said that the average establishment worshiping drone is just as decietful and corrupt in their day to day lives as the establishment politicians they worship. Dirty minds the collectivist have. And people say #pizzagate is fake in a party full of guys like this one.
Exactly like we did with China? Sure, let's do it that way. Tell them we didn't like that they hacked us. And continue to trade and make billions off of each other.
Like... no private government servers in bathrooms, and using better passwords then "password". I got an idea... what if like you quit electing and promoting corrupt establishment types, so when the e-mails do get hacked, nobody cares because it's all boring stuff. If it was Russians, or Seth Rich, the collective didn't seem to care at the time. I remember. It was a lock for Hillary/landslide. She also won the popular vote so obviously the whole Russian hacking thing is just an excuse fed to establishment tools to go out and repeat.
Yup. The proverbial killing of the messenger. Oh, and where was the outrage over the Chinese stealing 22.1 million personnel records? Now that was an attack; the Wikileaks info were a public service... Yeah. And what I find fascinating is that the Russians were unable to effect the voting in New York, Massachusetts, or California. So I guess there are limits to their super powers. Nothing like losing an election to get Dems all worked up. Cheating during presidential debates? The party not treating one of its candidates fairly? Mainstream media personalities biased to an extreme? Sorry, we can't be bothered with such nonsense, we're busy screaming about those evil Russians! It would be humorous, if it wasn't so sad...
Russia used hacked information, still unsure of how this could be negative since the information in those leaks was TRUE. Democrats are the new McCarthyites.
If they hacked the DNC and they were normal and boring, nobody would care. The collectivist are more mad that the DNC got caught being corrupt, then they are that the DNC is corrupt.
This is such a travesty, because Trump and conservatives need actual opposition, not the neoliberal idiots like Obama, Clinton, Biden, nearly all of them.
I see no reason to go to war over non-existent WMD's or false rumours of hacking. If seeing is believing - or a good source of information reason enough to trust - then it all comes down to your source, right? So who says that Russia was hacking? Is it the same guy who said there were WMD's in Irak? First of all Wikileaks says that their intelligence comes from a whistle-blower, not by a hacker. Secondly, the damage that was done was by Hillary Clinton, not by the messenger. Maybe you should go to war with the Clinton family. Or just stick them in prison.
We already know they are more corrupt. Trump is as corrupt as he legally thinks he can be in everything he does, though sometimes has gone over the line with, e.g., his charity. It's always about being within the law, never about ethics with him. I'm not an establishment or collectivist person at all. I would like to see us abolish our democratic republic and replace it with a technocratic republic (basically experts in charge) that tells dumb people they can have their opinion but not have it enforced, unlike encouraging voting for the most charismatic narcissist. Though I acknowledge that is unlikely to happen in our lifetimes. The other part wasn't meant to be sexual so much as torturing America's enemies in an ironic way (Trump will kill polar bears with coal, give polar bears a chance for revenge... Putin and Trump seem to love each other so let's have them tie the knot). And Trump approves of torture anyway right?
