Australia: Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” plows car into pedestrians, cops say not t

Full title: Australia: Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” plows car into pedestrians, cops say not terror-related

Right. A POS shouting "Allahu akbar" plows a car into a group of people killing 4 and injuring 15 isn't terror related.

How does it help anyone hiding the truth except the terrorists?


And we have recently seen this at Ohio State, in Nice, in Berlin, in Israel, and elsewhere.

“BREAKING: Terror Attack in Australia? Vehicle Plows into Pedestrians in Melbourne,” by Patrick Poole, PJ Media, January 19, 2017

Breaking news out of Melbourne, Australia that at least three people have died after a vehicle plowed into a group of pedestrians near a shopping mall.

According to one witness, the driver was screaming, “Allahu Akhbar, Allahu Akhbar, Allahu Akhbar!”…

Witnesses describe the scene:

“There was a man hanging out of the window screaming” – teen describes driver as thin, dark hair, appeared Middle Eastern. @theheraldsun pic.twitter.com/Y6JWW3djp1

— Andrea Hamblin (@AndieHamblin) January 20, 2017

This witness claims the driver was screaming, “Allahu Akhbar, Allahu Akhbar, Allahu Akhbar!”

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/...-into-pedestrians-cops-say-not-terror-related

But I'm sure this witness is just a right wing plant.

https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71/videos/10154918896196171/

 

Aww.... crap. What a way to start off this beautiful day... sorry, Aussies

 

Let's just hope the motivation isn't covered up

 

A witness says he heard him yelling allahu ackbar.
He says on his facebook page he is a greek islamic kurd.
The reporter filming the witness telling his story has been told to take the story
down. Everyone in Australia is wondering if it was a terrorist attack or not.
The Police are saying it wasnt. Is it a snow job or not...only time will tell...
All they have to do is interview the witness...
Believe what you want to believe...

 

He has a Greek father & a Tongan mother. He is an ice addict (crystal meth). He also claims to be a Yazidi - the people ISIS is trying to exterminate & definitely not Muslim. His Facebook page (which I have quoted in several threads) talks about the Bible & refers to the 10 commandments in posts made in the last few days.

The previous night he stole a car, stabbed his brother, beat up his step father, kidnapped a young woman & was then hunted by police for hours before he turned up at one of the busiest intersections in Melbourne doing burnouts in his car. It was only by accident he even found himself on a busy pedestrian mall - he had tried a side street but it was blocked (that was witnessed personally by the right wing mayor of Melbourne).

The only 'evidence' he is Muslim is a single FB post where he also claims to be a Yazidi, Kurdish and a 'angel death cult'. Of the hundreds of witnesses today only one thought he heard anything remotely islamic, and that guy was an Italian tourist trying to decipher an Australian/Greek/Tongan accent at a distance in a noisy environment.

Of course, all the fanatics and brain deads are screaming 'cover up' and 'Muslim', but there is no credible evidence. In a 'post-truth' world, however, none of this will matter. The truth is whatever your prejudice says it is.

 

yeah the police said the incident is not related to islamic terrorism

 

And the pesky witness saying he shouted Allahu akbar

And the fact he used a vehicle to mow people down like the rest of the islamic terrorists.

Good Lord wake up.

 

The penny just dropped.
Police have to say that this is not terror related as they have told the
public he was on the radar for other reasons.
If they admit it was a terrorist attack, then the media would tear them to
pieces and ask why wasnt he arrested previously. The families of the deceased
and injured would then be able to sue the Police Department for a breach of a duty
of care for not arresting the pos. It would cost the Police, or should I say the government
millions of dollars.
Simple way out...say it was not terror related......

 

I'm a far leftist socialist and I believe we should DEMONIZE MUSLIMS over this incident!

 

The bloke is a (*)(*)(*)(*)bag druggie bastard. Nothing to do with Muslims or Islam or terrorism.

 

Right, he just so happened to employ the same method of killing that other Islamic terrorists have used, and just so happened to chant "Allahu Akbar".

 

I don't know where the evidence is for the suggestion he used that phrase. It certainly isn't being reported. It might be on Facebook but how is that evidence? Instead of Facebook why not read various media outlets for any sign of him being a Muslim terrorist? I've read several local ones and there's nothing about this. No reports of it at the scene. Look at the precursors for this behaviour. There is no evidence at all of terrorism.

 

So if the guy is still alive why not simply ask him why he did it?

 

I lived in Australia for a year and a half back in the late sixties. I recall that their immigration policy excluded blacks because they already had their aboriginal population and didn't want to increase the possibility of race problems like we have in the U.S. It looks as thought their strict thinking on the subject collapsed into the swamp of Liberalism.

 

Fixed it for you.

 

In the OP Genius. And its a video.

What a shocker.

Do you have the slightest bit of evidence he is lying about what he heard? Anything other than your own bias?

 

One witness whose first language isn't English trying to decipher something shouted from a moving car at some distance in an accent even some Australians would struggle with.

if that is all you have - and it is - then you are the one who needs to wake up.

 

First comes denial, then comes lying. Australia isn't the only democracy in denial over the Islamist problem but by ignoring the obvious they only make themselves look foolish.

 

Its a video of a guy who thought he heard something, not of the guy saying it.

Do you have the slightest bit of evidence that he correctly heard what the guy was saying? There were hundreds of people in that crowd. Some of them were closer to the car than this guy. There is film, you can see it. I heard some of them interviewed yesterday. They were all Australian & better equipped to understand what the guy was saying. None mentioned this. Do you have any evidence that they are lying?

- - - Updated - - -

The obvious is that a guy with a serious drug problem killed a bunch of people. That is where the evidence points, anything else is denial.

 

These are from his his FB page, which can still be accessed (don't listen to idiots who say otherwise, click on the link). If you have the time you can find these quotes yourself. Sounds like a deluded Christian to me.

https://www.facebook.com/S1KUNT

This was two days ago - before he stabbed his brother & beat up his step father. its the last stuff he posted:

Not exactly 'I'm going to kill for Allah' is it?

 

Meth....that must be why they call it dope.

 

Of course, you have some sort of evidence to back all this up......

Also, why can they only sue if its terrorism? This guy was already know to police and they had been trying to apprehend him all that morning. Why does the presence or absence of terrorism change the issue of potential law suits. Try referring to actual laws or relevant cases. You know, evidence.

You've made a claim, time to defend it.

 

A guy who was actually there. Unlike you.

Did they mention what he heard? Of course not. You are making this far too easy.

So you still have nothing to disprove what he says he heard. Got it.

And its just a coincidence this guy used the same tactic at least 2 other Islamic terrorists have used to kill people.

Come back when you meet back up with some common sense.

And you have nothing to base the idiotic conclusion that he is a Christian other than your own ignorance and bigotry.

So lets review.

You have no evidence the witness is lying

You have no evidence what he heard was something else

And you have no evidence this murderer is a Christian.


We call that striking out here in the states, mate. Come back when you have more than your bias and hunches to fall back on.

 

Uhoh.


He claimed to be 'Greek Islamic Kurdish' and a follower of Yazdanism, the native religion of the Kurds before the arrival of Islam, also know as the 'cult of Angels'.

He ranted about the Illuminati, called unbelievers 'dogs', and vowed to 'have god's laws re-instated' in the weeks before the attack

A close friend told said Gargasoulas' rantings were driven by heavy use of the drug ice, and that he had recently converted to Islam.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Melbourne-CBD-car-attacker.html#ixzz4WMCFUPDd
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook[/B]

There goes another pathetic attempt by the left in this thread to cover up the truth.


G'day mate