Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Warfare / Military > Terrorism


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 09:37 AM
wind's Avatar
wind wind is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,712
nepal us oregon
wind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant future
Credits: 15,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Fox View Post
A puppet government implies that another power is "pulling the strings" behind another government.


Vietnam was truly an unending war.

The United States is the power pulling the strings in the Iraqi government now. Iraq is another unending war, just like Vietnam.

We have lost in Iraq, just as we lost Vietnam. We need to get out now.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 09:42 AM
White Fox's Avatar
White Fox White Fox is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 札幌市
Posts: 7,048
singapore de hesse
White Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 36,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wind View Post
The United States is the power pulling the strings in the Iraqi government now. Iraq is another unending war, just like Vietnam.

We have lost in Iraq, just as we lost Vietnam. We need to get out now.
LOST?!? LOST?!?!

Show me an enemy the United States military forces cannot defeat in Iraq. Show me why we cannot win, for we won long ago. Show me why it cannot end, it seems over to me.

We will probably never resolve the issue of who is actually controlling the Iraqi government, but their elections were reviewed by the international community.
__________________
.
"It is extremely difficult for our contemporaries to conceive of the conditions of free banking because they take government interference with banking for granted and as necessary"

-- Ludwig von Mises


Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 10:19 AM
wind's Avatar
wind wind is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,712
nepal us oregon
wind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant future
Credits: 15,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Fox View Post
LOST?!? LOST?!?!

Show me an enemy the United States military forces cannot defeat in Iraq. Show me why we cannot win, for we won long ago. Show me why it cannot end, it seems over to me.

We will probably never resolve the issue of who is actually controlling the Iraqi government, but their elections were reviewed by the international community.
We lost. Bush declared "Mission Accomplished" because he believed, (as you do) that Iraq was all about our military forces suppressing Saddam's government. It was SUPPOSED to be about ending terrorism. The war in Iraq was intended to be the war on terror. All Iraq has done is make terrorism ten times worse. The Iraqi occupation has promoted increased terrorism.

We never planned for the occupation. We lost in Iraq the minute we didn't consider protecting their antiquities, their culture and their people. We lost because we have not restored power, water and sanitation, nor employment in Iraq.

This war cannot end because it was failed from the beginning, by going in on a lie, it is failed in the middle, by failing the occupation, and it will fail in the end (if it ever ends) because we will NEVER get out of Iraq.

We have ruined our chances for having allies in the Middle East by eight years of Bush's disasterous polices.

"When future historians look back at the sharp decline of the United States in the early 21st Century, they might identify the Achilles heel of this seemingly omnipotent nation as its lost ability to recognize reality and to fashion policies to face the real world."

Robert Parry

Last edited by wind; 05-25-2008 at 10:31 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 10:28 AM
White Fox's Avatar
White Fox White Fox is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 札幌市
Posts: 7,048
singapore de hesse
White Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 36,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wind View Post
This war cannot end because it was failed from the beginning, by going in on a lie, it is failed in the middle, by failing the occupation, and it will fail in the end (if it ever ends) because we will NEVER get out of Iraq.
We did go in on a lie, and we should not have gone in at all. But now that we have toppled their government and brought instability (and yes, more terrorism) we have to stay until it is safe for the people. I don't see how we have failed in the occupation; the surge has worked wonderfully. We will eventually leave Iraq, but I agree with McCain when he says that we will probably have bases and some military forces in Iraq for (possibly) 100 years. It won't be a big deal then because the violence will have all but disappeared completely.
__________________
.
"It is extremely difficult for our contemporaries to conceive of the conditions of free banking because they take government interference with banking for granted and as necessary"

-- Ludwig von Mises


Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 11:05 AM
lunecat's Avatar
lunecat lunecat is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,041
uk scotland
lunecat has much to be proud oflunecat has much to be proud oflunecat has much to be proud oflunecat has much to be proud oflunecat has much to be proud oflunecat has much to be proud oflunecat has much to be proud oflunecat has much to be proud of
Credits: 14,990
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justabubba View Post
feeding him haggis will violate the geneva conventions against torture
There is no such thing a "Geneva conventions against torture"

Shows what you know!
__________________
Russian Imperialism is a greater danger to the World today than AlQueda terrorism
Reply With Quote
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 12:28 PM
wind's Avatar
wind wind is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,712
nepal us oregon
wind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant futurewind has a brilliant future
Credits: 15,350
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Fox View Post
We did go in on a lie, and we should not have gone in at all. But now that we have toppled their government and brought instability (and yes, more terrorism) we have to stay until it is safe for the people. I don't see how we have failed in the occupation; the surge has worked wonderfully. We will eventually leave Iraq, but I agree with McCain when he says that we will probably have bases and some military forces in Iraq for (possibly) 100 years. It won't be a big deal then because the violence will have all but disappeared completely.
We have failed in the occupation. Five years of occupation has done nothing more than humiliate the US armed forces. The Iraqi's don't want us there. We are the cause of the instability in their country and our presence insures that there will be continued terrorism.

We have failed the war in Iraq and we have failed the occupation. We have not secured saftey for the Iraqi people, restored the infrastructure--including power, water and sanitation, or helped revive the economy.

The surge--meant to be temporary--has turned into somethign that is long and crude.

Bush's administration has done nothing but cause the problem and now it manages the defeat.

If you want more of Bush--vote for McCain. Sounds like that's your plan. IMO this is the main reason McCain will be defeated. We don't need a war president--we need a peace president. We need someone with diplomacy skills. Obama will be that President.
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 01:23 PM
White Fox's Avatar
White Fox White Fox is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 札幌市
Posts: 7,048
singapore de hesse
White Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond reputeWhite Fox has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 36,194
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wind View Post
We have failed in the occupation. Five years of occupation has done nothing more than humiliate the US armed forces. The Iraqi's don't want us there. We are the cause of the instability in their country and our presence insures that there will be continued terrorism.
They might not want us there, but they definitely don't want us to leave. They have recognized that we are there only hope in the short term for peace and stability.

Quote:
We have failed the war in Iraq and we have failed the occupation. We have not secured saftey for the Iraqi people, restored the infrastructure--including power, water and sanitation, or helped revive the economy.
The goal of the war was to unseat Saddam and make sure they did not have WMD. In that, we have succeeded. The other goals you have listed here are secondary and in progress.

Quote:
The surge--meant to be temporary--has turned into somethign that is long and crude.
If by long and crude you mean effective at restoring peace and stability, then yes.

Quote:
Bush's administration has done nothing but cause the problem and now it manages the defeat.
The goal of the war was to unseat Saddam and make sure that there were no WMD there. In this, we have succeeded, even if the reasons were not good.

Quote:
If you want more of Bush--vote for McCain. Sounds like that's your plan. IMO this is the main reason McCain will be defeated. We don't need a war president--we need a peace president. We need someone with diplomacy skills. Obama will be that President.
A vote for McCain is a vote against Obama. There is no Bush-like candidate or anyone better than Bush, or I would vote for them. And when Obama says that he will pull out of Iraq, he doesn't really mean it. This is obvious if you have read his responses to questions on Iraq or if you have read his plan for change. He will stay there as long as McCain would.
__________________
.
"It is extremely difficult for our contemporaries to conceive of the conditions of free banking because they take government interference with banking for granted and as necessary"

-- Ludwig von Mises


Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 01:51 PM
justabubba's Avatar
justabubba justabubba is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,497
us north carolina
justabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond reputejustabubba has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 33,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunecat View Post
There is no such thing a "Geneva conventions against torture"

Shows what you know!
Quote:
No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be threatened, insulted, or exposed to any unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind.
[emphasis added]

http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/91.htm

my reference to serving haggis to osama bin forgotten being a geneva convention violation was a lame attempt at humor. you did not indulge me that so here is my reply to your lame attempt to debate
__________________
“Mayor Palin fails to have a firm grasp of something very simple: the truth.”
[Frontiersman editorial, 2/7/97]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anikdote View Post
... Which is a notion I stupid. ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spare View Post
Well, that settles it ... who cares about facts?
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2008, 12:08 PM
peaceful warrior peaceful warrior is offline
Correspondent
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 235
usa us new hampshire
peaceful warrior will become famous soon enough
Credits: 1,009
Default

first of all we've already won the WAR. remember bush, on the ship, with the jets, and the big mission accomplished flag? yeah. i thought so. this is now a 'police action' , which is war-like, only nicer and with much less iraqi killing. THAT is what we're bad at and thats what we failed at in Vietnam. Of course we could crush them. If we were really trying Osama would be dead by now... but we have many foolish, though well intented im sure, liberals who refuse to support our troops and give them adequate equipment. Also these same people keep crying for a 'humane war'. Which is a huge oxy-moron. However i digress, the main reason we're "losing" as some mistakenly put it, is because those same people force us to fight with our hands tied.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden