I'm unaware of any lie about this....?

What I said in my initial post was:

"... we had previously determined that she doesn't read any current events or political science publications, that she can see Russia from Alaska which qualifies as international experience, and that she let the McCain campaign run all over her and keep her from being able to assert herself."

In saying this, I was referring to her interview with Charles Gibson. Specifically, here's a copy of the exchange that came to mind:

I took this from the best transcript I could find in a few minutes, at: http://www.clipsandcomment.com/2008/...gibson-part-i/

__________________
Viator
Pro Deus Et Patria - For God & Country

Your post:

"I first am going to ask the moderators to clean this site up. Posts like the one above mine serve zero purpose except to flame bait and troll. Start handing out suspensions... it is getting really old."

Followed by:

Hilarious.

__________________
Always be wary of righties bearing "facts".
Who are you calling a cootie queen you lint licker?!

GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?

PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.

__________________
Always be wary of righties bearing "facts".
Who are you calling a cootie queen you lint licker?!

I cited a specific example.... a left wing poster made a comment that she does not read any material to give her knowledge. The only place to gain such an assumption is from the Katie Couric interview which purposely tried to portray a negative image.

The truth of the matter was that Couric had (4) hours of interview coverage. Palin by the time Couric asked this question was completely irritated with Couric's bull crap. When Couric asked the question, Palin had enough and decided not to play along anymore. The mistake Palin made was not her past of not reading magazines and other material which she clearly does do as revealed by later interview. Her mistake was allowing Couric to play the stupid game and then getting frustrated with the tactics. She should have taken the high road and just answered the questions or ended the interview. Palin clearly made a mistake, but it was not what the previous poster claims. The previous poster displays ignorance as they have not chosen to educate themselves on Palin, yet are willing to make ignorant comments about her that can be proven wrong.

My post has substance behind it and therefor is not a troll, flamebait, etc...

Unlike what you have just done in your response and will likely do after this post. You troll 90% of the time. Many posters have told me to just put you on ignore. I have never done that to ANY poster anywhere.

__________________
"...more bureaucratic government "jobs" that are nothing but a drain on an already sick economy." - Pollycy

"When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both." - James Dale Davidson

How do you remove something that isn't there? LMFAO

__________________

In technical terms she is correct according to many sources.

http://www.slate.com/id/2200155/

__________________
"...more bureaucratic government "jobs" that are nothing but a drain on an already sick economy." - Pollycy

"When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both." - James Dale Davidson

I'm not a left-wing poster, I'm anti-idiot.

As I said, if she couldn't answer the question the first time, and wasn't able to follow-up with a better answer once people started commenting on it, then what am I to do with that? You never answered that one.

Please provide proof that Katie Couric purposely tried to portray a negative image of Sarah Palin. Otherwise, it's just another opinion that you shouldn't couch as some sort of definite fact. I'm of the opinion that Palin couldn't answer the question, and there's evidence to prop that up into "fact" territory.

__________________
Viator
Pro Deus Et Patria - For God & Country

Nobody was arguing that you can see Russia from Alaska, it was that this somehow qualifies as international experience or insight into foreign policy.

Can you see that from Alaska?

__________________
Viator
Pro Deus Et Patria - For God & Country

Her experience in foreign relations equates or even exceeds BHO's at the time.

__________________

Funny how "experience" wasn't even a quality anyone who voted for Obama felt was necessary...or wanted. They brushed off having experience as something we didnt want...look at what experience has gotten us they said.
We need change...a fresh take.

But with Palin....experience is somehow a valuable asset again...lol. Flip flopping libs.