Ron Paul is our last hope of peacefully taking back our government.

Ron Paul is old, and, like John McCain, most of his viewpoints are aged as well. They are not from this generation. And while some of his viewpoints may be legitamite and agreeable to some, I personally believe we need a modern "up-to-date" candidate.

But I do agree with him on a few issues, don't get me wrong. He's not bad at all... just a little outdated.

__________________
Believing that McAfee is going to protect you from hackers and viruses is exactly like believing that republicans can actually protect you from terrorists.

When the rich wage war, it's the poor who die.

I like his foreign policy and how he relates with the constitution, but I am a pretty big liberal who enjoys the services of big government, and I am kind of scared of what he will do to government agencies.

It's kind of hard to do a lot of the things he proposes in such a globalized and complicated economy that is so woven into corporatism.

I wish his solutions were that easy.

But I will still support him over any other republican candidate.

__________________
Signature:

He is only talking about cutting the federal government agencies and programs that (*)(*)(*)(*) away tax dollars. If we don't need it then why should we pay for it? We could afford to live a lot better if we didn't have to pay for things like the $315 million Bridge to Nowhere.

Great video. I hadn't seen that one before.

__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

2+2=4 is very aged. Is it still valid?

__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

For the most part I favor Ron Paul. His plan to eliminate the IRS and the income tax is great, his position on small government is a breath of fresh air as is his anti-social program attitude, and for the most part(excluding terrorists) every American citizen deserves privacy from the government.

The only issues I have with him are on foreign policy and security. He is simply too passive on those subjects. Other than that though, he seems like a reasonable candidate.

__________________
“Good leaders abhor wrongdoing of all kinds; sound leadership has a moral foundation.”

-Proverbs 16:12

Building a fence on the border, doubling the size of the Coast Guard, and maintaining all our nuclear weapons is too passive? This is where you guys just don't WANT to understand Ron Paul's position. He doesn't advocate being a pacifist. He advocates having a strong defense. But defense isn't starting pre-emptive wars in foreign countries and wasting trillions of dollars to oust a dictator that you had given billions of dollars to in the past.

__________________
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." - Schopenhauer

That's right, he isn't a pacifist at all, he just doesn't want to be a bully either.

__________________
To all christians: Why do you put up with a religion of repression and ignorance?





you can find me at silithrias.bravehost.com