Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Should Kagan be removed from the bench?

  1. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leftysergeant View Post
    Got a source for that?
    The source quoted in the OP was Ib Jensen who, except for his own online self-description (of dubious accuracy) is a completely unknown blogger.

    No sources for the claims being made are provided and this appears to be nothing by political hyperbole which is not at all surprising these days. One blogger makes a claim and then other cite it as if it's a ligitmate source of information. Rarely as in this case of Kagen, is there any attempt at accuracy by the initial blogger.

    A nice try though but there is obviously nothing impeachable about Kagen's actions on the Supreme Court. Supreme Court decisions are not based upon political philosophy anyway. Supreme Court decisions are based upon interpreting the US Constitution and applying it to the laws and actions of government in the United States. We do have Supreme Court justices that have a broad interpretation of the US Constitution as well as justices that have a narrow interpretation of the US Constitution but that has absolutely nothing to do with political ideology or philosophy.
    PoliticalForum.com functions as a public forum website open to all individuals of all political persuasions that is centered on the discussion of politics in general. All walks of life are welcome to join the discussions in the tradition of vigorous respectful debate.

    I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. ~Evelyn Beatrice Hall


  2. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FreshAir View Post
    is this a faux news report
    Even better: it's a freeper thread based on an answers.yahoo.com question...lol.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...5120055AAXn18w

    “Social Security has nothing to do with the deficit. Social Security is totally funded by the payroll tax levied on employers and employees. If you reduce the outgo of Social Security, that money would not go into the General Fund to reduce the deficit, that would go into the Social Security Trust Fund. So Social Security has nothing to do with balancing the budget or lowering the deficit.” –Ronald Reagan

    PF's Liberal Progressive Underground


  3. #13

    Default

    No, she should not. Mere silliness.

  4. #14

    Default

    Why haven't the forum's RepubliCONs demanded that sexual deviant and pornography lover Clarence Thomas be removed from he Supreme Court???
    Corporations enjoyed their highest profits since 1900 under President Obama ~ why don't the right wing media celebrate this TRUTH?

    November 2012 elections: A victory for America!

  5. #15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by toddwv View Post
    Even better: it's a freeper thread based on an answers.yahoo.com question...lol.

    http://answers.yahoo.com/question/in...5120055AAXn18w
    I'm so impressed. First the "Average College Idiot" asks a stupid question and then "Ginger" copies and pastes BS as a response. We must all be really impressed by these "unquestionable" sources being used by brain dead individuals.
    PoliticalForum.com functions as a public forum website open to all individuals of all political persuasions that is centered on the discussion of politics in general. All walks of life are welcome to join the discussions in the tradition of vigorous respectful debate.

    I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. ~Evelyn Beatrice Hall

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. "Under God"... should be removed from the "Pledge"
    By Johnny-C in forum Political Opinions & Beliefs
    Replies: 442
    Last Post: Mar 09 2012, 11:14 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks