Thread: The right to bare arms..... questioning the understanding.

Originally Posted by raymondo

Which is one of the main reasons you are the planet laughing stock .

So because we actually believe in the right to keep and bear arms, you consider us a "laughing stock." That seems extremely close-minded on your part.

But since becoming degenerate you are now regarded as very dangerous to yourselves , let alone others.

What do you mean by this sentence?

I believe it is disingenuous for gun lovers, as anarchists, to claim they are willing to do anything constructive with an unfettered right to keep and bear Arms, It is one reason our Founding Fathers specifically enumerated the reason why a well regulated militia of the People who keep and bear Arms is necessary; to the security of a free State not a free Peoples'.

Originally Posted by danielpalos

I believe it is disingenuous for gun lovers, as anarchists, to claim they are willing to do anything constructive with an unfettered right to keep and bear Arms,

So all "gun lovers" are anarchists? Very nice job taking a very immature approach to mischaracterize those that disagree with your point of view. Would you be okay with the statement, "It is disingenuous for gun haters, as communists, to claim they are willing to do anything constructive since they do not believe in the right to bear arms and self defense?" I didn't think so. Try to write something constructive next time.

It is one reason our Founding Fathers specifically enumerated the reason why a well regulated militia of the People who keep and bear Arms is necessary; to the security of a free State not a free Peoples'.

What? The 2nd Amendment clearly states the people's right to keep and bear arms is necessary to the security of a free state. It's as simple as that.

Originally Posted by drj90210

So all "gun lovers" are anarchists? Very nice job taking a very immature approach to mischaracterize those that disagree with your point of view. Would you be okay with the statement, "It is disingenuous for gun haters, as communists, to claim they are willing to do anything constructive since they do not believe in the right to bear arms and self defense?" I didn't think so. Try to write something constructive next time.

What? The 2nd Amendment clearly states the people's right to keep and bear arms is necessary to the security of a free state. It's as simple as that.

You are welcome to actually answer the question on why gun lovers, as anarchists, feel they should be exempted from State gun control (laws) which every other citizen of that same State, must follow.

The End is clearly enumerated in that Commandment from our Founding Fathers. Why be unfaithful to our own supreme law of the land and federal Constitution of our Republic?

Small arms are insignificant from a government perspective. The arms only threaten individuals within the society, not those "controlling" it. Explosives are a threat. Most don't appreciate the genius of Nobel and the decades of chemistry and engineering that was necessary to safely prepare nitrated toluene, glycerin and cellulose.

Originally Posted by Mr Stefan Downey

It is known throughout the world that Americans have the 'right to bare arms'.

This has been assumed to have meant guns or weaponry in modern times. What if i was to suggest that it was in fact actual arms, meaning that when it was been drafted and sanctioned what was meant was that there would be no such punishment as sevring the arms of thieves, as it was thought that america would be of the status where if such a thing as thievery were t happen the people in charge of the situation would in fact lok into why and how it happened be it lack of money work or food and thus allowing for a fantastic society.

hmmmmmmm?

I think the right only really took off in the 1920s with the advent of the flappers and beach goers.

Originally Posted by danielpalos

You are welcome to actually answer the question on why gun lovers, as anarchists...

Sure. I'll start when you answer why all gun haters, as communists, feel that they have the right to overlook the Bill of Rights.

feel they should be exempted from State gun control (laws) which every other citizen of that same State, must follow.

Who is advocating breaking state law here? What we are suggesting is that many state laws should be considered unconstitutional, because they are in violation of the 2nd Amendment. Following the Heller v D.C. supreme court decision, this is certainly a possibilty.

The End is clearly enumerated in that Commandment from our Founding Fathers. Why be unfaithful to our own supreme law of the land and federal Constitution of our Republic?

Fine question. Why indeed do you feel it necessary to be unfaithful to the Bill of Rights?

We should all have the right to bear arms but I would rather have hulk hands

This is very simple.....the founders intended for us all to have a cannon and a horse to pull it in the garage, and a musket, powder, shot, and a sabre.

Of course in those days, that's what the other guy might have to fight you with.

So!...adjusting for our changing landscape of weaponry....we should each have a howitzer, a grenade launcher, a tank, and an aircraft carrier....Oh!...and a helicopter. I need one of those

"So!...adjusting for our changing landscape of weaponry....we should each have a howitzer, a grenade launcher, a tank, and an aircraft carrier....Oh!...and a helicopter. I need one of those"
Goldwater

Yes. And to think that taxpayer dollars go towards food stamps and not RPG's. I haven't received government cheese or government RPG's. Where's mine? In fact, try to build your own RPG and see what happens in the USA.