Thread: The right to bare arms..... questioning the understanding.

It is known throughout the world that Americans have the 'right to bare arms'.

This has been assumed to have meant guns or weaponry in modern times. What if i was to suggest that it was in fact actual arms, meaning that when it was been drafted and sanctioned what was meant was that there would be no such punishment as sevring the arms of thieves, as it was thought that america would be of the status where if such a thing as thievery were t happen the people in charge of the situation would in fact lok into why and how it happened be it lack of money work or food and thus allowing for a fantastic society.

hmmmmmmm?

Originally Posted by Mr Stefan Downey

It is known throughout the world that Americans have the 'right to bare arms'.

This has been assumed to have meant guns or weaponry in modern times. What if i was to suggest that it was in fact actual arms, meaning that when it was been drafted and sanctioned what was meant was that there would be no such punishment as sevring the arms of thieves, as it was thought that america would be of the status where if such a thing as thievery were t happen the people in charge of the situation would in fact lok into why and how it happened be it lack of money work or food and thus allowing for a fantastic society.

hmmmmmmm?

I would suggest to you that you are delusional. The right to bare arms is to defend ourselves against the type of government we have now. So look for the fireworks to start soon.

If you actually read the Federalist Papers and other supporting documents of the Bill of Rights, then it is extremely obvious that the founders were referring to firearms.

drj9... what if i were to suggest the supporting documents and federalist papers where made at a later date by others that weren't involved, nor understood the way the consitution was written and merely wanted to benefit from a firearms deal with the misuse of the constitution?

as for sable gsd, capitalism is communism, no civil wars required again just a realization that some people are 'nincompoops'.

I think you kiddies mean the right to BEAR arms, as to hold or carry. We have always been free to wear short sleeved shirts.

Originally Posted by Mr Stefan Downey

drj9... what if i were to suggest the supporting documents and federalist papers where made at a later date by others that weren't involved, nor understood the way the consitution was written and merely wanted to benefit from a firearms deal with the misuse of the constitution?

I would respond by saying that your statement is incorrect to the point of absurdity. To suggest that the Federalist Papers were written after the Bill of Rights and to suggest that they were written by people that were not involved intimately in the creation of this nation would be akin to stating that the moon is made out of Swiss cheese.

Originally Posted by sablegsd

I would suggest to you that you are delusional. The right to bare arms is to defend ourselves against the type of government we have now. So look for the fireworks to start soon.

Which is one of the main reasons you are the planet laughing stock .
But since becoming degenerate you are now regarded as very dangerous to yourselves , let alone others .

Only a folk which has the right to bare arms can be called a Free Folk.

I think women should have the same right to bare their breasts in public as men do.

I thought this thread was about wearing short-sleeved shirts.