![]() |
|
| Sponsored Links |
| Red Cross - Donate Today Save the Rainforest |
|
||||
|
Quote:
There wouldnt be a single independent thinker or non-bought academic that would class the USA system as democratic. You can argue all you like but you have a responsibility to be honest about what the words "democracy" and "freedom" mean and how they are defined in practise. The USA is a Plutocratically based Oligarchy that funnels almost all of its power and welath through an undemocratic private coroporation system that is propped up by tax payers funds and favourable legisaltion that locks out the public from having a say. These sorts of systems are NOT democratic. Dont feel deluded or ashamed about this fact - there are no actual democracies in operation in the world today. You can bang your head up against the wall all you like but this is a fact - research it honestly and diligently and you will discover this universal axiom for yourself. And when you do you may be able to make a difference in your country! Next thing you will be saying is that the US economy is a free market place and democratic
__________________
Supreme Executive for the I.S.S.F Last edited by Foolosophy; 05-08-2008 at 06:54 PM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
I repeat, the US is not a classical Greek democracy where everybody votes on everything. The country is to big for that to work or to protect the freedom of the people themselves. Face it, majority rule does not always guarantee freedom. That is why, with the signing of the Constitution, we have come to define democracy as the Federalist system proposed by the founding fathers and whose logical support for you will find in The Federalist Papers, by Madison, Hamilton, and Jay. Quote:
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Excellent post. Noam Chomsky put it like this when he famously remarked: "The US is a single-ideological state with competing political factions." That's the reality of the situation as it stands in the US today. Clearly, the US is an oligarchy. In fact, the US is no more a democracy in terms of OUTCOME than for example Cuba is. In reality the opposite is true as I will attempt to illustrate below.
You see, in order to ascertain relative levels of purported democracy, we have to evaluate countries' democratic credentials in terms of OUTCOME rather than the FORM a particular democracy may take. For example, few people outside of Cuba would describe that country as a democracy in the FORMAL sense. But in terms of OUTCOME, as any person who has visited or lived in Cuba will confirm, the country is far more democratic than the US. So what we need to do in the first instance is define our terms. I would argue that we ought not to view democracy in the formal and abstract sense in terms of whether we get to vote once every 4 or 5 years, but rather whether it is actually delivered in a real meaningful way that is beneficial and responsive to the society in question. In Cuba, unlike my country, Britain, the elderly do not die of preventable diseases because they cannot afford, for example, to heat their homes in winter. In Cuba, access to health facilities and treatment is not dependent upon whether you have a big bank balance. Last year my wife was refused IVF fertility treatment in our national health service, but nobody in Cuba is refused this. In Cuba, there are more medical doctors per capita than anywhere else on earth. Fidel tried in vain to dispatch many of these doctors to New Orleans in the wake of hurricane Katrina but they were refused entry into the US by Bush for ideological and political reasons. All students in Cuba, from the cradle to the grave, receive free medical care and free primary, secondary and university education. Nobody in Cuba is homeless and it has a higher life expectancy and lower infant mortality rate than any other comparable developing country on the planet. Moreover, Cuba has a higher literacy rate than the US. It has managed to do all this despite the country being under a virtual state of economic siege by successive US administrations for the past 49 years. Naturally, not everything is perfect in Cuba and it certainly cannot be classed as a socialist society in the Marxist-Leninist sense. What I am merely pointing out is that democracy is better judged not purely in terms of monetary and capitalist values as is the case with the vast majority of Western liberal democracies like the US and Britain, but in terms of how responsive it is to the needs of its people. In my view, this is the real measure of the wealth of a nation through which the term 'democracy' should be best applied. |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
I think America is finally ready for another president with polio. |
|
||||
|
Have you heard of The iron law of oligarchy? First developed by the German syndicalist sociologist Robert Michels in 1911 ?
if not, read up on it. anyways Robert Michels was disturbed to find that, paradoxically, the socialist parties of Europe, despite their democratic ideology and provisions for mass participation, seemed to be dominated by their leaders, just like the traditional conservative parties. He also stated that regardless of how democratic or autocratic a country may be at the start, will eventually and inevitably develop into oligarchies. of course all this crap about oligarchy is debatable and still not quite clear or solid in it's assertion. yet if Robert Michels is right, then I am holding the mirror up to ALL European countries as well. Your choice, do you want to continue this argument? or do you get my point? ...
__________________
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. Thomas Jefferson |
|
||||
|
This law holds in pluralistic republics like the US as well. The people who have the most influence in the various interest groups that they head up for the people they represent have the most voice in public policy because they are the most active in making themselves heard. Anyone can do this if they are sufficiently motivated, just write your congressman a letter and you can be heard. You are a voter, they will listen, and, no, you do not have to buy them out.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A "People's House" or an oligarchy? | JEQuidam | United States | 9 | 05-29-2008 12:04 PM |
| A "People's House" or an oligarchy? (U.S.A.) | JEQuidam | Political Opinions & Beliefs | 0 | 04-26-2008 12:48 PM |
| How to get back democracy to the "democracy" todays? | trodas | Political Opinions & Beliefs | 3 | 10-07-2007 03:14 PM |
| Democracy | MaxFromRussia | Elections & Campaigns | 3 | 04-19-2007 07:35 AM |
| We are NOT a Democracy | Tom | Political Opinions & Beliefs | 16 | 04-01-2004 02:54 PM |
| Sponsored Links |
|