Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: Arleigh Burke class destroyer Vs Daring class Destroyer.

  1. #1

    Default Arleigh Burke class destroyer Vs Daring class Destroyer.

    Which is the best destroyer in the world.

    Daring class having the best radar and tracking systems, but the Arleigh Burke class has more missiles for more and different targets.

    This isn't about ship on ship, but which would be better for a navy to have.
    Last edited by antileftwinger; Feb 02 2012 at 05:28 AM.


  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by antileftwinger View Post
    Which is the best destroyer in the world.

    Daring class having the best radar and tracking systems, but the Arleigh Burke class has more missiles for more and different targets.

    This isn't about ship on ship, but which would be better for a navy to have.
    The Arleigh Burke's are multi-mission ships. They can do anti-sub, anti-air, ABM, anti-satellite, gunfire support, carry anti-ship missiles, and launch Tomahawk cruise missiles.

    The Daring's are specialized anti-aircraft destroyers with only limited capability in other areas.
    sputterman: "Aiding the enemy? If the truth aids the enemy then we are in the wrong war."

    Me: "When the people who teach our children, protect us from fires and criminals, save our lives when we're injured, and defend us with their very lives make less in a year than a guy who throws a ball for a living makes in an hour, there is something truly (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up with our country."

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Questerr View Post
    The Arleigh Burke's are multi-mission ships. They can do anti-sub, anti-air, ABM, anti-satellite, gunfire support, carry anti-ship missiles, and launch Tomahawk cruise missiles.

    The Daring's are specialized anti-aircraft destroyers with only limited capability in other areas.
    We have been over this question before.

    Both are superb ships, but the 'Arleigh Burkes' have an allround capability, whilst at present the 'Darings' are solely AA Destroyers........though the 'Darings' were designed to be fitted with 'Harpoon' and 'Tomahawk' missiles, but during ship build these systems weren't fitted due to costs. They may be fitted in future refits, particularly the Harpoons, as these missiles are available from mothballed ships.
    2 x 'Phalanx' CIWS has recently been fitted to 'Daring'

    At present the 'Darings' can blast anything out of the sky, but can only engage other surface warships and land targets with the use of the 4.5" gun.

    I presume the 'Arleigh Burkes' are the best allround warship around at the moment....and the Americans are quite happy to keep improving them, and building more of them, at the expense of newer more radical ships such as the 'Zumwalts', because the 'Burkes' are tried and tested.

  4. #4
    canada ca quebec
    Location: Beauharnois, Qc, Canada
    Posts: 5,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mepal1 View Post
    We have been over this question before.

    Both are superb ships, but the 'Arleigh Burkes' have an allround capability, whilst at present the 'Darings' are solely AA Destroyers........though the 'Darings' were designed to be fitted with 'Harpoon' and 'Tomahawk' missiles, but during ship build these systems weren't fitted due to costs. They may be fitted in future refits, particularly the Harpoons, as these missiles are available from mothballed ships.
    2 x 'Phalanx' CIWS has recently been fitted to 'Daring'

    At present the 'Darings' can blast anything out of the sky, but can only engage other surface warships and land targets with the use of the 4.5" gun.

    I presume the 'Arleigh Burkes' are the best allround warship around at the moment....and the Americans are quite happy to keep improving them, and building more of them, at the expense of newer more radical ships such as the 'Zumwalts', because the 'Burkes' are tried and tested.
    The american could also go the Japanese way and build a bigger and improved 'Arleigh Burkes'. Look at the Kongô and Atagô class destroyer/cruiser.

  5. Default

    First hostile submarine comes along and the Daring 'cans are artificial reefs.

    The Burkes are as good a ASW platform as you can have without being a submarine yourself.
    ObamaTax Delendum Est

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taxcutter View Post
    First hostile submarine comes along and the Daring 'cans are artificial reefs.

    The Burkes are as good a ASW platform as you can have without being a submarine yourself.
    I forgot, having had a tour around the Type 45 Destroyer 'Daring' it does have a helicopter hanger filled with anti-submarine torpedoes, so it does have some defence against those sub boys!

  7. #7
    canada ca quebec
    Location: Beauharnois, Qc, Canada
    Posts: 5,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mepal1 View Post
    I forgot, having had a tour around the Type 45 Destroyer 'Daring' it does have a helicopter hanger filled with anti-submarine torpedoes, so it does have some defence against those sub boys!
    Not if your heli isn't airborne...

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by antileftwinger View Post
    the Arleigh Burke class has more missiles
    This one. You can never have too many missiles.
    I will knit you a nice S.T.F.U.
    The world needs more philosophy majors working at Starbucks.
    - Up on the Governor

    If you teach a man to fish, he may eat for a lifetime. Unless he hates to eat fish. Then you will have just wasted his time.
    - Demand Euphoria

  9. #9

    Default

    The big difference is that the Burke's have been in service for 20 years and continually improved while the Daring's haven't had that chance yet.

    Remember, the early Burke's did not even have helicopter hangars for ASW helicopters.

  10. Default

    A Landing Ship Helicopter has an impressive helicopter hangar, but is just a target for a modern submarine.

    The Daring is nothing but a smaller,faster LHS with a lot of anti-aircraft capability.

    The Daring is a throwback to the old soviet single purpose 'cans.
    ObamaTax Delendum Est

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks