The position of the Syrian resolution of the two permanent members of UN Security Council - Russia and China - is quite justified.
First, in the country from the very beginning there have been military actions against the government. U.S. has given arms and pushed the terrorist so-called opposition to the armed overthrow of the legitimate authority.
Second. In the U.S. and Western media are absolutely biased position taken unilaterally introducing what is happening in Syria as a military suppression of peaceful demonstrations seeking democracy. Meanwhile, on the side of the leadership of Bashar Assad is a significant, if not most of the population.
Third. Russia has offered his services to organize talks between the Syrian government and the opposition sane. Were rejected by all the numerous attempts to negotiate an end to the bloodshed. fatal role was played from the tips of Washington.
Fourth. As events in Libya, the resolution could be used for armed intervention in Syria. More recently, the U.S. asked Russia not to veto the UN resolution on Libya, presenting it only as a requirement for closing the skies over the country. Then the UN resolution was used directly for the capture of Libya, the U.S. and its vassals to gain access to oil.
So, what your saying is, killing peaceful demonstrators was justified?