Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Political Issues > Warfare / Military
cover of time magazine for april cover of time magazine for april
Register FAQ Members List Quizzes Radio and TV Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
Page 4 of 8 « First < 23 4 56 > Last »
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:40 PM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is online now
Site Moderator
Guru
  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 17,523
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 110,203
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by namvet View Post
you DID serve right????
Yep. Never saw combat, but I served.
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:41 PM
namvet's Avatar
namvet namvet is offline
Sr. Correspondent
  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 519
namvet has disabled reputation
Credits: 1,688
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrusaderRabbit08 View Post
You act as if all vets have to think the same way or they aren't vets.
thanks for NOT answering the Q
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:41 PM
CrusaderRabbit08's Avatar
CrusaderRabbit08 CrusaderRabbit08 is offline
Analyst
  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,449
norway
CrusaderRabbit08 has disabled reputation
Credits: 76
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarheeler View Post
I think it does a great disresperct to every Marine, soldier, sailor, and airman to ever serve.
Then you would be wrong, because I don't feel disrespected.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:42 PM
namvet's Avatar
namvet namvet is offline
Sr. Correspondent
  
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 519
namvet has disabled reputation
Credits: 1,688
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrusaderRabbit08 View Post
Then you would be wrong, because I don't feel disrespected.
did you raise that flag honey????
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:43 PM
raytri's Avatar
raytri raytri is online now
Site Moderator
Guru
  
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Minnesota
Age: 41
Posts: 17,523
usa us minnesota
raytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond reputeraytri has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 110,203
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by MasTequila View Post
Liberals (not democrats) take classic American icons, which they hate like the military. They trash the military, call them terrorists and all in all hate their very existence.
Wow. Generalize and stereotype much?

Quote:
Then when trying to make a point will use a classic photo like this (that American soldiers died during) and (*)(*)(*)(*) on it to get their liberal point across.
The point was to illustrate the headline "War on Global Warming." It's a somewhat clever way to do that.

Quote:
What is next a picture of trees buried at Arlington?
Maybe. So what?

Quote:
Then they try to play it off like its a joke and anyone offended by their stupidity has no sense of humor.
I just think anyone offended by the cover is easily offended -- or was looking to be offended in this case because they think the cover was dreamed up by liberals who hate the military.

The image simply is not offensive or disrespectful.
__________________
Man up.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:44 PM
CrusaderRabbit08's Avatar
CrusaderRabbit08 CrusaderRabbit08 is offline
Analyst
  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,449
norway
CrusaderRabbit08 has disabled reputation
Credits: 76
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by namvet View Post
did you raise that flag honey????
No dear ..
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:46 PM
Tarheeler's Avatar
Tarheeler Tarheeler is offline
Site Moderator
Commentator
  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC
Posts: 1,060
usa us north carolina
Tarheeler is a splendid one to beholdTarheeler is a splendid one to beholdTarheeler is a splendid one to beholdTarheeler is a splendid one to beholdTarheeler is a splendid one to beholdTarheeler is a splendid one to beholdTarheeler is a splendid one to behold
Credits: 22,889
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrusaderRabbit08 View Post
Then you would be wrong, because I don't feel disrespected.
Hence the "I think". And apparently, some of us definitely do.
__________________
For a people who are free, and who mean to remain so, a well-organized and armed militia is their best security.
Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:48 PM
MasTequila's Avatar
MasTequila MasTequila is offline
Guru
  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,322
usa us illinois
MasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 32,230
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by raytri View Post
Wow. Generalize and stereotype much?

Just Liberals

The point was to illustrate the headline "War on Global Warming." It's a somewhat clever way to do that.

Clever in whose mind, offensive in mine and many others.

Maybe. So what?



I just think anyone offended by the cover is easily offended -- or was looking to be offended in this case because they think the cover was dreamed up by liberals who hate the military.

The image simply is not offensive or disrespectful.
In your opinion, which you have a right to have because of soldiers like that. Because of soldiers like the ones pictured idiots can use them to try to sell a false political doctrine. I think it was week, stupid and offensive and if the person doing it had any real creativity they could have come up with something that didn't abuse our heros images.
__________________
Barack Obama 144 lies and counting.

Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies, but not terrorists.

democrats believe it is okay to taser a 10 year old if this stance will get their guy elected.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:48 PM
CrusaderRabbit08's Avatar
CrusaderRabbit08 CrusaderRabbit08 is offline
Analyst
  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,449
norway
CrusaderRabbit08 has disabled reputation
Credits: 76
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tarheeler View Post
Hence the "I think". And apparently, some of us definitely do.
Some vets are offended by it and some vets aren't.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 04-29-2008, 03:49 PM
MasTequila's Avatar
MasTequila MasTequila is offline
Guru
  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,322
usa us illinois
MasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond reputeMasTequila has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 32,230
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by CrusaderRabbit08 View Post
Some vets are offended by it and some vets aren't.
So your saying its okay to offend some vets?
__________________
Barack Obama 144 lies and counting.

Liberals believe it is okay to kill babies, but not terrorists.

democrats believe it is okay to taser a 10 year old if this stance will get their guy elected.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 4 of 8 « First < 23 4 56 > Last »

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How liberal Time Magazine portrays candidates Blade Media & Commentators 18 12-11-2007 02:06 PM
Fox and Star Magazine nonsqtr Media & Commentators 4 07-15-2007 05:23 AM
Time Magazine Hides Terrorists in the Bible apotropoxy Media & Commentators 10 03-29-2007 05:38 AM
Ann Coulter doesn't like he rphoto in Time Magazine kaladrew Current Events 4 04-22-2005 08:58 AM
ACCORDING TO TIME MAGAZINE POLL.. MUNKO-1970 Elections & Campaigns 16 09-05-2004 08:06 AM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 AM.

Political Forum Index RSS Feeds - Contact Us - Political Forum Index - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden