Political Forum
     

Go Back   Political Forum > Politics by Region > Western Europe


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2009, 02:18 AM
HillBilly's Avatar
HillBilly HillBilly is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Western North Carolina
Age: 53
Posts: 1,284
usa us north carolina
HillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond reputeHillBilly has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 12,420
Default NO..

Quote:
Originally Posted by British National View Post
You been small banned once , are you trying for the big " B " ...
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Red Cross - Donate Today    Save the Rainforest
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2009, 03:25 AM
Munqi Munqi is online now
Sr. Correspondent
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 524
finland european union
Munqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond reputeMunqi has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 3,037
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cassandrabandra View Post
the brits should have thought of that a couple of centuries ago.

they have exploited colonial people for centuries.

all of us should be honorary UK citizens, and have equal rights to live and work in Britain if we so choose.
Where did you even get this idea?

This is honestly the first time ive ever heard anyone say that the old empires should pay reparations in the form of immigration.

Is this what you people down there really think or just you? And do you realize how impossible the whole idea is? The commonwealth consists mainly of poor countries with hundreds of millions of the worlds poorest people in it. If given the chance to work, or get welfare, in britain they will take that opportunity. Even if we disregard the fact that brits would have to destroy their welfare system entirely it would still drive down wages for low educated workers. The british government has an obligation to protect its poorest from competition like that. And if they dont, like they arent right now, the poor vote for bnp and then arrogant (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bags on political forums get to call them racists.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2009, 01:42 PM
British National British National is offline
Banned
Observer
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 72
uk
British National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant futureBritish National has a brilliant future
Credits: 176
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HillBilly View Post
You been small banned once , are you trying for the big " B " ...
Small banned? I don't understand
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2010, 12:07 AM
Tofiks's Avatar
Tofiks Tofiks is offline
Observer
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Latvia
Age: 25
Posts: 55
latvia
Tofiks has much to be proud ofTofiks has much to be proud ofTofiks has much to be proud ofTofiks has much to be proud ofTofiks has much to be proud ofTofiks has much to be proud ofTofiks has much to be proud ofTofiks has much to be proud ofTofiks has much to be proud of
Credits: 399
Default

Britanns and other west europeans will be in big (*)(*)(*)(*) affrer ~50 years with her liberalism and political correctly against muslim immigrants...

Last edited by Tofiks; 01-02-2010 at 12:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2010, 02:00 AM
Oddquine's Avatar
Oddquine Oddquine is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Caithness, Scotland
Age: 62
Posts: 1,739
uk scotland
Oddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 12,586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tofiks View Post
Britanns and other west europeans will be in big (*)(*)(*)(*) affrer ~50 years with her liberalism and political correctly against muslim immigrants...
I'm more inclined to think the UK is PC for muslims, Tofiks...just as we are for Poles, Sikhs, Jews etc. There appears to be a tendency in my country to form policy around those who shout loudest........and pressure groups rarely spring up out of the majority of contented people, but from those with an agenda to pursue.

Those who daemonise muslims/immigrants have their own reasons for doing so..such as the BNP and UKIP looking to enter mainstram politics........or the "can work, won't work" element dragging up excuses for why they are claiming the dole.

I do think that immigration needs to be controlled...not to keep certain people of specific religions/races/colours out, but so that Britain doesn't sink under the combined weight of incomers and current British citizens.
__________________
Where am I going......and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right. Martin Luther King Jr.
"BE NICE TO AMERICA OR WE'LL BRING DEMOCRACY TO YOUR COUNTRY"....a US bumper-sticker warning!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2010, 02:41 AM
highlander highlander is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Inverness Highlands of Scotland
Posts: 1,269
highlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 8,047
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oddquine View Post
I'm more inclined to think the UK is PC for muslims, Tofiks...just as we are for Poles, Sikhs, Jews etc. There appears to be a tendency in my country to form policy around those who shout loudest........and pressure groups rarely spring up out of the majority of contented people, but from those with an agenda to pursue.

Those who daemonise muslims/immigrants have their own reasons for doing so..such as the BNP and UKIP looking to enter mainstram politics........or the "can work, won't work" element dragging up excuses for why they are claiming the dole.

I do think that immigration needs to be controlled...not to keep certain people of specific religions/races/colours out, but so that Britain doesn't sink under the combined weight of incomers and current British citizens.
I'm not sure its not divide and conquer!
For instance, why should you have a black fireman or police union?
Or black what ever?
If its fair and impartial, its one union for all!
Why should I be excluded from black unions? Would that not be racism?
Those that shout the loudest are the ones allowed at that time to be used against another fraction of the community in that period of time!
As for immigration, it suits those higher echelons of society, cheap labour and a scape goat whenever one is needed.

Though I do believe as in Scotland, if there is someone unemployed and there is work, that local person should have first option. Why should we pay for cheap labour for the various exploiting businesses.
Why should the likes of Highland Council one of the biggest employers pay subsistence and mortgages for senior and not so senior civil servants coming up to fill positions in the highlands from the south of England!
And that was stated to me by an HR manager who was English and from the Highland Council!
I know of one Polish woman, who was given £3000.00 plus in DSS payments just before Christmas. For her family in Poland! That cannot be right!

Or the hundred of thousands Highland Council budget, paid yearly for immigrants to get English lessons at night school, transportation be it taxi or public transport paid for, by the council, Course fees paid for by the Council, and Babysitting services, paid for by the Council! They can even get expenses!

And they don't turn up!

No the system is wrong, and it needs changed!

Regards
Highlander

Last edited by highlander; 01-02-2010 at 02:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2010, 04:59 AM
DutchClogCyborg's Avatar
DutchClogCyborg DutchClogCyborg is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,866
netherlands european union
DutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond reputeDutchClogCyborg has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 24,089
Default

PC is stupid, expect the same of all people, same laws for all people, same consequences for all people, there is no need to appoint a black police leader above a white one, unless he is simply suited better then the white one

the best guy for the job, ( or woman)
__________________
http://www.jihadwatch.org/ Daily Islamic Jihad update

Support Geert Wilders! http://www.geertwilders.nl/

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
Daily Update of the known victims of the global genocidal Jihad


Freedom center and information about the Jihad.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2010, 03:28 AM
Oddquine's Avatar
Oddquine Oddquine is offline
Analyst
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Caithness, Scotland
Age: 62
Posts: 1,739
uk scotland
Oddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond reputeOddquine has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 12,586
Icon13

Quote:
Originally Posted by highlander View Post
I'm not sure its not divide and conquer!
For instance, why should you have a black fireman or police union?
Or black what ever?
If its fair and impartial, its one union for all!
Why should I be excluded from black unions? Would that not be racism?
Those that shout the loudest are the ones allowed at that time to be used against another fraction of the community in that period of time!
As for immigration, it suits those higher echelons of society, cheap labour and a scape goat whenever one is needed.
Why shouldn't you have a black fireman or police union as long as black firemen/police perceive that the other options ignore their concerns? It will take a genuinely fair and impartial.........and competent....union to achieve real integration in the workplace.........and there ain't that many competent unions.

When I was working, I'd have been ecstatic to have had the option of a union which actually gave as much weight to the concerns of those marginalised members such as myself, rather than preen because they "acquired" concessions for the pregnant/workers with families slightly better than the law already allowed. Decent employment practices and pay rises would have been good as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by highlander View Post

Though I do believe as in Scotland, if there is someone unemployed and there is work, that local person should have first option. Why should we pay for cheap labour for the various exploiting businesses.
Why should the likes of Highland Council one of the biggest employers pay subsistence and mortgages for senior and not so senior civil servants coming up to fill positions in the highlands from the south of England!
And that was stated to me by an HR manager who was English and from the Highland Council!
I know of one Polish woman, who was given £3000.00 plus in DSS payments just before Christmas. For her family in Poland! That cannot be right!

Or the hundred of thousands Highland Council budget, paid yearly for immigrants to get English lessons at night school, transportation be it taxi or public transport paid for, by the council, Course fees paid for by the Council, and Babysitting services, paid for by the Council! They can even get expenses!

And they don't turn up!

No the system is wrong, and it needs changed!

Regards
Highlander
I agree the system is wrong and needs changed..........but the system was not put in place by the immigrants or the employers........they are simply taking advantage of a setup, which is ludicrous in the extreme, put in place over years by successive governments..so why take it out on the immigrants?

After all, if the UK were not such patsies, why would asylum seekers be bypassing all the European countries in which they can be safe from persecution to reach the UK?

Good luck in getting native Brits (or anyone else) with families, but no self respect, to take the lower paid jobs in a system which actually pays you to have children to the extent that you can be a lot better off not working at all. It has little to do with the level of wages...........it has more to do with the level of benefits predicated on the concept of "relative" poverty which no longer encourages individuals to support their own families.
__________________
Where am I going......and what am I doing in this handbasket?
Cowardice asks the question, 'Is it safe?' Expediency asks the question, 'Is it politic?' But conscience asks the question, 'Is it right?' And there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular but because conscience tells one it is right. Martin Luther King Jr.
"BE NICE TO AMERICA OR WE'LL BRING DEMOCRACY TO YOUR COUNTRY"....a US bumper-sticker warning!
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2010, 05:14 AM
highlander highlander is offline
Commentator
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Inverness Highlands of Scotland
Posts: 1,269
highlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond reputehighlander has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 8,047
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oddquine View Post
Why shouldn't you have a black fireman or police union as long as black firemen/police perceive that the other options ignore their concerns? It will take a genuinely fair and impartial.........and competent....union to achieve real integration in the workplace.........and there ain't that many competent unions.
When I was working, I'd have been ecstatic to have had the option of a union which actually gave as much weight to the concerns of those marginalised members such as myself, rather than preen because they "acquired" concessions for the pregnant/workers with families slightly better than the law already allowed. Decent employment practices and pay rises would have been good as well.
I agree the system is wrong and needs changed..........but the system was not put in place by the immigrants or the employers........they are simply taking advantage of a setup, which is ludicrous in the extreme, put in place over years by successive governments..so why take it out on the immigrants?
After all, if the UK were not such patsies, why would asylum seekers be bypassing all the European countries in which they can be safe from persecution to reach the UK?
Good luck in getting native Brits (or anyone else) with families, but no self respect, to take the lower paid jobs in a system which actually pays you to have children to the extent that you can be a lot better off not working at all. It has little to do with the level of wages...........it has more to do with the level of benefits predicated on the concept of "relative" poverty which no longer encourages individuals to support their own families.
Mm.... I have always been a member of a union... some unions have been a waste of time. But thats mostly because of the members!

The American management tool, give employees everything and take everything back off them one at a time!
Make change, stop, make change, stop.
Continual change until you get exactly what you want to give the nation/workforce!
This process, we have been going through since 1979!
If wages are so low, and minimum wages are so low what's the point of working when your worse off!
But remember if they remove the safety net of immigrants, you also remove the safety-net for your family!
Increase Minimum wages to remove the bureaucracy of family tax credit(Jobs for the boys)!
The options would then be work and pay your way! Which wouldn't mean any detriment to your family and the ability to pay your way!
It's only a matter of time before the National health service will be so marginalised it will collapse!
DSS for those requiring long time care, will be removed!
It will quickly get back to the early 1900's when people will starve!
Well that's my long term synopsis considering the previous and current political position in the UK by Tory and Labour!

regards
highlander
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2010, 05:29 AM
cassandrabandra's Avatar
cassandrabandra cassandrabandra is online now
Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,322
cassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond reputecassandrabandra has a reputation beyond repute
Credits: 21,333
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by highlander View Post
Mm.... I have always been a member of a union... some unions have been a waste of time. But thats mostly because of the members!

The American management tool, give employees everything and take everything back off them one at a time!
Make change, stop, make change, stop.
Continual change until you get exactly what you want to give the nation/workforce!
This process, we have been going through since 1979!
If wages are so low, and minimum wages are so low what's the point of working when your worse off!
But remember if they remove the safety net of immigrants, you also remove the safety-net for your family!
Increase Minimum wages to remove the bureaucracy of family tax credit(Jobs for the boys)!
The options would then be work and pay your way! Which wouldn't mean any detriment to your family and the ability to pay your way!
It's only a matter of time before the National health service will be so marginalised it will collapse!
DSS for those requiring long time care, will be removed!
It will quickly get back to the early 1900's when people will starve!
Well that's my long term synopsis considering the previous and current political position in the UK by Tory and Labour!

regards
highlander
don't you have a system where family payments are payable to workers as well as welfare recipients, and are dependant on income regardless of source?

if you have a good system which ensures you don't "double tax" through means testing and taxation combined,(and loss of housing subsidy) it can encourage people to participate in the labour market, even with low income jobs, while still seeing an improvement in disposable income.
__________________
"To light a candle is to cast a shadow."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oh Lord, Only in the South Joe1991 Humor & Satire 12 11-16-2008 08:30 PM
Lord, listen... You've gotta honor your own name, here... JMS Elections & Campaigns 6 10-13-2008 11:13 PM
will ferrel vs his 2yr old land lord JMS Off-Topic Chat 1 04-21-2007 03:46 PM
Praise the Lord/ Pass the Ammunition apotropoxy Current Events 13 01-09-2006 01:36 PM
The Lord of the Right Wing marybeth77 Humor & Satire 16 08-06-2004 03:55 PM

Sponsored Links

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Template-Modifikationen durch TMS
vBCredits v1.3 ©2007 by Darkwaltz4
Advertisement System V2.1 By   Branden