Page 4 of 17 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 164

Thread: Scottish "nationalists" win parliamentary majority for "independence" referendum

  1. #31

    Unhappy Being tortured or killed by the Queen's police

    Quote Originally Posted by Plymouth View Post
    When was the last time someone was tortured or killed by way of the Scottish Police Force?
    The police have these vicious dual-purpose torture instruments as standard issue police equipment which they carry about with them.




    A quote from my web-page.
    Police sadistic torturers

    Having been arrested myself a few times for protesting, I can testify that some police officers are sadistic torturers who can hurt and injure people they have arrested simply because they enjoy it.

    For example, the police are issued with rigid handcuffs - a rigid bar (not a chain) connects the wrist braces and police officers can exert excruciating bruising force on the arrested person's wrists, and cut off the blood supply to the hands.


    When they brutally misused rigid handcuffs on me, I screamed in agony but the police officers just laughed.

    A lot of police officers really enjoy hurting people.

    This police brutality is unofficially state sanctioned - police officers can in practice torture with impunity, whatever the theory of the police complaints procedure. For example, in a police station, I've been tortured at the Sergeant's desk, while on the wall, a poster about the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights is displayed (but utterly ignored). The state is completely hypocritical.

    The dangers of police equipment, brutality and what to do

    The design of these rigid handcuffs invites, and makes it easy for, brutal or careless police officers to seriously damage the health of the handcuffed person.

    It is not just the traumatising agony but permanent damage may be done both by crushing injury to the wrist themselves, or by injury to the hands and to other parts of the body by blood clots which may form if the blood supply to the hands is impeded for any length of time.

    If blood clots lodge in the hands themselves then death of the tissues in the hands may occur leading to partial or total permanent loss of the use of your hands - permanent disability may result.
    Ultimately, as in deep vein thrombosis, if blood clots travel from the hands and then lodge in the brain, then a stroke involving permanent brain damage may occur.

    If the blood clots lodge in the blood vessels supplying the lungs then a pulmonary embolism may cause death by asphyxiation.

    Be under no illusion, if a police officer applies these handcuffs to you, too tightly and for too long, it is your life that the police are endangering.

    Disregard anything that the civil service or the government may say about "existing guidelines for the police are to ensure that handcuffs are not applied incorrectly and to respond promptly to the arrested persons requests to loosen handcuffs" etc.

    Forget such worthless reassurances, many police officers don't care in the least about you, your health or any guidelines and if they happen to kill you with handcuffs and they can get away with that then that is exactly what they will do.

    When you beg them to loosen the handcuffs, many police officers will simply take enjoyment from your suffering and then tighten the handcuffs even more. Some police officers are sadists who will use these handcuffs to torture their victims. I know - they have done that to me! Such sadists are not fit or proper people to be employed as police officers - nevertheless, for now, police officers is what they are.
    Obviously I have not been killed at the hands of the police but others have.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUbKzP6xI6A"]YouTube - ‪Police are the murderers! DEMO Downing St, London.‬‏[/ame]



    Quote Originally Posted by Plymouth View Post
    If such is true, surely Her Majesty's Inspectors of Constabulary ought be informed...
    Again from my web-page.
    These rigid handcuffs are a menace to human health and they should be banned immediately but don't hold your breath while waiting for that ban. So long as the same perverts - senior police officers, HM Inspectors of Constabulary, civil servants and government ministers - continue to run the police, expect nothing but cruelty and indifference to victims of handcuff torture and injury.
    Last edited by Peter Dow; May 27 2011 at 06:39 PM.
    Peter Dow's Scottish National Standard Bearer website
    and check my profile here for a visitor message I posted which summarizes my core politics.


  2. #32
    scotland
    Location: Inverness Highlands of Scotland
    Posts: 4,394
    Blog Entries: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Plymouth View Post
    When was the last time someone was tortured or killed by way of the Scottish Police Force? If such is true, surely Her Majesty's Inspectors of Constabulary ought be informed...
    http://scot-land.blogspot.com/2010/1...-top-scot.html

    Well if they are installed by Government.....who do you go too????

    Court cases held in Camera......50 years sentences!

    Thirty to fifty cases at a time!!!

    Regards
    Highlander

  3. #33

    Question The SNP Mystery

    Quote Originally Posted by highlander View Post
    http://scot-land.blogspot.com/2010/1...-top-scot.html

    Well if they are installed by Government.....who do you go too????
    From that blog you quoted from.
    SPOOKS MURDERED TOP SCOT?

    Former Scottish National Party vice-chairman Willie McRae

    which in turn links to this newspaper story -
    The McRae Mystery.
    The Daily Record.
    Oct 19 2007 By Reg Mckay

    JUST another car crash off a hazardous country road? No. The most intriguing, unsolved murder of the last 25 years. Willie McRae was a larger-than-life character.

    A prominent Scottish lawyer, he'd fought and won many cases opposing the government. As an SNP activist, he'd held national office and come close to becoming an MP.

    Yet McRae also revelled in his radical anti-nuclear stance - a dangerous position in the 1980s.

    On Friday, April 5, 1985, he left his Glasgow office to head north to his weekend home in Kintail.

    Laden with his usual bulging briefcase and armfuls of legal document a big grin splitting his face, he turned to his office sta ("staff"? - PD) and said: "I've got them! without further explanation.

    They were to be the last words he was known to have ' spoken.

    Around 10am the following day, an Australian tourist and his wife pulled their car in at an isolated spot on the A87.

    A maroon Volvo lay 30 or so yards off the road, straddling a burn, and the couple wanted to check no one was hurt. hT ("They / he"? - PD) found a man slumped in the driver's seat, unconscious, hi ("his"? - PD) head smeared with blood.

    The next car to arrive was driven by Dr Dorothy Messer, accompanied by her fiancé David Coutts, a Dundee SNP councillor who was shocked to the injured man as Willie McRae.

    Dr Messer immediately examined McRae and found he was alive, though dilated pupils indicated serious brain damage.

    The police were alerted by another motorist. PC Kenny Crawford arrived from Inverness on his own.

    The cops had been told that a prominent Scottish politician, activist and lawyer was lying injured in an isolated spot. What did they do? Send one lonesome PC.

    PC Crawford did his best. He and David Coutts struggled to get McRae's limp body out of the car.

    With the limited facilities available to her, Dr Messer had concluded that McRae had been hurt in a road accident. The good doctor had done her best. There was nothing to contradict that view -yet.

    Willie McRae was taken to Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, and then on to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, the standard procedure for I brain damage treatment.

    There, six hours after his discovery, a nurse washed the patient's head and found a bullet hole. An X-ray confirmed McRae had been shot above his right ear. The hitman's bull's eye.

    Willie McRae died at 3am on April 7, 1985, at least 36 hours after being injured. Already folk were questioning how the whole affair had been handled.

    Realising there had been a (*)(*)(*)(*)-up, Chief Superintendent Andrew Lester, of Northern CID, took over the case immediately.

    Yet McRae's car was promptly removed from the site of what was now a suspicious death. Normally the scene would have been cordoned off and the car kept there while forensics, photographers and scenes of crime officers completed their work.

    It was later revealed police couldn't remember where Willie McRae had been found. They were a mile out until their mistake was pointed out by one of the civilians who had been at the scene. The tragic comedy of errors continued.

    When McRae's body was found, PC Crawford had collected a small pyramid of the dead man's personal papers all carefully torn up, topped with his smashed wrist-watch and found 20 yards from his car.

    Who had put them so neatly there? Who knows? Too many people had trampled over the ground, ruining any clues. A search the next day revealed a Smith & Wesson .45 in the stream 60ft from the car. The gun had been fired twice and had no fingerprints.

    Twice? Who could shoot themselves twice in the head?

    McRae wasn't wearing gloves when found. So who wiped the gun of prints?

    Sixty feet? Who could throw the hefty gun that distance when they'd just put a bullet in their own brain?

    Yet a post mortem would leave an open verdict, suggesting suicide. When challenged, the police suggested the heavy gun had been carried downstream by the water of the wee burn. That theory was soon dismissed.

    While they were trying to remove McRae from his car, PC Crawford's cap fell off and David Coutts had bent to retrieve it, getting a clear view of the stream beside and under the car. There was no sign of any gun.

    It also emerged the pathologist had failed to carry out a basic test on the wound to determine the range the gun was fired from,
    A fundamental test, since suicides always press the gun hard into their skull to be sure, A hitman, on the other hand, might fire from inches or feet away. The closer you get the messier you get and mess is evidence that's difficult to conceal.

    McRAE had left for Kintail laden with documents, a bottle of whisky and a pack of cigarettes to feed his chain-smoking habit. None were found in his belongings.

    At the time of his death, McRae had been working on yet another sensitive case. Having previously legally prevented the UK Atomic Energy Authority in 1980 from dumping nuclear waste in the Ayrshire hills, he intended to have a similar impact on plans to dump waste from Dounreay in the sea.

    McRae had hinted to colleagues that he had been passed classified government documents - not for the first time - and colleagues knew he was carrying highly sensitive papers on this case.

    Friends believe it was the Dounreay inquiry he was referring to when, as he left the office, he said: "I've got them!"

    Yet no papers of his relating to Dounreay have ever been located. Over months before his death, Willie McRae's house was repeatedly burgled, his legal papers disrupted and destroyed. He became cautious, security conscious and had a copy of the Dounreay papers with him at all times, as he did on the day he died. But they were never found.

    The only other copy of the Dounreay papers were kept in his office. Who'd break into a big lawyer's office? But they were stolen when it was burgled. Nothing else was taken.

    People began to look for a wider explanation of McRae's death. They didn't have to look too far back.

    The year before McRae died, a gentle woman called Hilda Murrell was found murdered in her cottage in rural Shrewsbury. Hilda was a rose grower, a pacifist -who could want to kill her? A robber?

    Yes. But the only thing stolen from her home were some papers to do with her other passion - anti-nuclear protesting. Later, it was leaked to the press that Hilda's nephew was a naval intelligence officer involved in the sinking of the Belgrano during the Falklands War, then a great controversy since the ship had been heading away from battle when deliberately sunk.

    But no papers of his were taken - just Hilda's anti-nuclear evidence. It was yet another smoke screen. The question was why?

    Retired police officers have revealed that because of his legal and political work, McRae was on the files of MI5.

    One of the cars used to trail him was a Triumph, registration number PSJ 136X. Wherever McRae went, that car followed.

    He had noticed the motor. Willie McRae was nobody's fool. When he raised the matter with a friendly cop, he checked the computer. The car came up marked as "blocked vehicle". That's shorthand for belonging to the Special Branch or I ("MI5"? - PD)

    Yet no inquiry was held into the death of Willie McRae. Instead, there was a whispering campaign suggesting that McRae was everything from an alcoholic, to a homosexual, to a man in deep financial trouble.

    Good enough reasons why he might be troubled, why he might have killed himself, but absolutely without any substance.

    No one has ever seen the post mortem report. The procurator fiscal in Inverness has refused to comment on the case, citing the Official Secrets Act.

    When Madame Ecosse, Winnie Ewing, carried out an investigation for the SNP she was bluntly denied access to the Crown Office papers in spite of giving the customary legal guarantee of confidentiality.

    Every independent person who has examined the case of Willie McRae concludes it wasn't suicide. If not suicide then what?

    Murder? But by whom and in whose name?

    'Willie McRae was nobody's fool...he knew he was being followed by shadowy figures'
    The SNP Mystery

    Who do you go to Highlander?

    Don't you go to the SNP and ask them why they are still supporting the Queen in light of the McRae mystery which happened under the Queen's watch, while she was head of state?

    The Queen's "Her Majesty's Government" perhaps or other crown officers on their own initiative perhaps ordered McRae's murder and it reads like HMGs ever since are covering up what they know so why is the SNP still backing the Queen in light of her handling of the McRae case?

    Why are the SNP mostly still going to turn up to sit in front of the Queen like good wee corgis when she addresses parliament on 1st July?

    In case she has them shot in the head for not turning up?

    Or more likely, because the SNP just loved the royal wedding and just can't wait until the next royal propaganda broadcast and have forgotten who Willie McRae is?

    The bigger mystery is for all that the Queen has failed Scots over the years still the SNP lap up Salmond's nonsense about "constitutional monarchy" and how that "serves us well". No it doesn't! The "constitutional monarchy" gave us the McRae mystery, the Dunblane Primary school massacre, the Piper Alpha disaster, the Ibrox disaster, need I go on?
    Last edited by Peter Dow; Jun 11 2011 at 07:31 PM.
    Peter Dow's Scottish National Standard Bearer website
    and check my profile here for a visitor message I posted which summarizes my core politics.

  4. #34

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by highlander View Post
    Court cases held in Camera......50 years sentences!

    Thirty to fifty cases at a time!!!

    Regards
    Highlander
    What are you talking about? There was nothing about that in the link you gave.
    Peter Dow's Scottish National Standard Bearer website
    and check my profile here for a visitor message I posted which summarizes my core politics.

  5. #35
    scotland
    Location: Inverness Highlands of Scotland
    Posts: 4,394
    Blog Entries: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Dow View Post
    What are you talking about? There was nothing about that in the link you gave.
    No link to those arrested and put on trial from various areas of Scotland, the only thing reported at the time was that the cases were held in camera and that there were at least two cases more than thirty at a time and sentenced to between thirty and fifty years.

    You will not get a link!

    As for the SNP......give them a chance.....Allow the democratic processes and the people of Scotland to move forward, and allow them to take us forward at the appropriate time!
    The time of the Scottish nation decides......not you or me....but everybody!

    That time will come of that I'm sure!

    Take the blinkers off...as it will be with our nation at the correct time!!

    Regards
    Highlander

  6. #36

    Icon12 Devo-Max No to separation. Scottish referendum rigged

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEtYFYWFENQ]Devo-Max No to separation. Scottish referendum rigged (YouTube)[/ame]


    Satirical take on the desperate efforts of United Kingdom supporters proposing an devolution-maximum or devolution-plus alternative to the SNP's preferred option for a Scottish parliament approved referendum of the people of Scotland in support of an independent Queen's state of Scotland.

    Either way the referendum will be rigged to keep the Queen and deny real Scottish national independence.
    Peter Dow's Scottish National Standard Bearer website
    and check my profile here for a visitor message I posted which summarizes my core politics.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Dow View Post
    ..

    Either way the referendum will be rigged to keep the Queen and deny real Scottish national independence.

    That would be amusing and not an unattractive idea....

    Although its not really needed as the majority of Scots would vote for the Status Quo.

    I would like a refurendum on getting rid of the Holly-rude Parliment - its a waste of money, it is filled with 3rd rate politicians and is a disgusting hang-over from the last Socialist Government that balls-ed up the Country.
    Last edited by lunecat; Jan 17 2012 at 07:18 AM.
    A kind word is like a Spring day ....

  8. #38
    scotland
    Location: Inverness Highlands of Scotland
    Posts: 4,394
    Blog Entries: 2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Dow View Post
    Salmond, as usual, is telling lies.
    (Aside for non-Scots:
    The big lie Salmond tells is that he claims he and his "Scottish National Party" support and campaign for Scottish national independence, whereas they are disinterested in or hostile to genuine national independence and settle for much less.

    "National independence" implies that a nation has the independence to elect the head of the nation state, the president of a national republic, whereas Salmond only supports independence for appointed Queen's ministers of Scotland, administering a state, a kingdom, within the Windsor dynasty realm, "the union crown".

    In other words, Salmond surrenders the position of head of state to the Windsor royal family, and opposes the Scots independently electing a Scottish head of a Scottish state, as I explain, somewhat angrily, in this video)
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5aawSdrCMk"]YouTube - Peter Dow says Salmond betrays Scottish independence for Queen's united kingdoms[/ame]

    So this election result is not a victory for "a society and a nation". What nonsense!

    This is a victory of one party of royalist lackeys, the SNP, over other parties of royalist lackeys.

    The Queen wins again, like she always does when elections are rigged by the broadcasters spending so much air-time between elections broadcasting propaganda on behalf of the royal family, as recently with the royal wedding, then during political debates, giving preferential media coverage to royalist parties and royalist candidates.

    This election was rigged in favour of the Queen's candidates, as are all the other elections in her kingdom.

    It would be different and a good thing if the SNP had a republican leader and platform to fight for a Scottish republic, starting with banning the Queen from Scotland.

    But Salmond is a royalist and the SNP under his leadership is a royalist party and they are in politics to serve their Queen and to serve themselves. They are not in politics to serve the Scots.

    So the exact opposite of a Scottish republic will continue, as will soon be proved when the Queen visits Holyrood to rubber-stamp her new SNP administration at the opening of the new session of the Scottish parliament.

    What more Queen's government means for Scotland is a continuing stream of death, disaster and missed opportunity for the Scots.

    This is not "victory for the Scots". This is subjugation and brainwashing of the Scots by the United Kingdom and union crown state as per usual.
    You have the greatest difficulty in finding any harmony in your life!

    Salmon has taken the Scottish nation down a road of there choosing and all can see the benefit to the nation. An alternative to out and out racism against the Scottish nation for hundreds of years!

    And you haven't the humanity to understand change take courage and steps its far easier to denegrate any argument with bad mouthing an idividual!

    Open your eyes and heart to the benefit made to the Scottish nation by taking these few steps! Perhaps we will get independence a democratically elected government and come to fruition by those giving an alternative to the bigotry of those like your good self!

    Regards
    Highlander
    Last edited by highlander; Sep 29 2012 at 12:37 AM.

  9. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Dow View Post
    Salmond, as usual, is telling lies.
    (Aside for non-Scots:
    The big lie Salmond tells is that he claims he and his "Scottish National Party" support and campaign for Scottish national independence, whereas they are disinterested in or hostile to genuine national independence and settle for much less.

    "National independence" implies that a nation has the independence to elect the head of the nation state, the president of a national republic, whereas Salmond only supports independence for appointed Queen's ministers of Scotland, administering a state, a kingdom, within the Windsor dynasty realm, "the union crown".

    In other words, Salmond surrenders the position of head of state to the Windsor royal family, and opposes the Scots independently electing a Scottish head of a Scottish state, as I explain, somewhat angrily, in this video)
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5aawSdrCMk"]YouTube - Peter Dow says Salmond betrays Scottish independence for Queen's united kingdoms[/ame]

    So this election result is not a victory for "a society and a nation". What nonsense!

    This is a victory of one party of royalist lackeys, the SNP, over other parties of royalist lackeys.

    The Queen wins again, like she always does when elections are rigged by the broadcasters spending so much air-time between elections broadcasting propaganda on behalf of the royal family, as recently with the royal wedding, then during political debates, giving preferential media coverage to royalist parties and royalist candidates.

    This election was rigged in favour of the Queen's candidates, as are all the other elections in her kingdom.

    It would be different and a good thing if the SNP had a republican leader and platform to fight for a Scottish republic, starting with banning the Queen from Scotland.

    But Salmond is a royalist and the SNP under his leadership is a royalist party and they are in politics to serve their Queen and to serve themselves. They are not in politics to serve the Scots.

    So the exact opposite of a Scottish republic will continue, as will soon be proved when the Queen visits Holyrood to rubber-stamp her new SNP administration at the opening of the new session of the Scottish parliament.

    What more Queen's government means for Scotland is a continuing stream of death, disaster and missed opportunity for the Scots.

    This is not "victory for the Scots". This is subjugation and brainwashing of the Scots by the United Kingdom and union crown state as per usual.


    you're very naive peter, its one step at a time, political independence is a lot easier to achieve first, then after that we can decide on things like the royal family, eu, single currency etc at our leisure, its much easier to sell just leaving the union than leaving union and ditching the royals at the same time, dont be so naive, and vote yes when the time comes.

  10. #40

    Default Devo-Max No to separation. Scottish referendum rigged

    Thanks for reviving this thread. I noticed that my video is not embedding properly so I'll redo that now.

    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Dow View Post
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEtYFYWFENQ]Devo-Max No to separation. Scottish referendum rigged (YouTube)[/ame]


    Satirical take on the desperate efforts of United Kingdom supporters proposing an devolution-maximum or devolution-plus alternative to the SNP's preferred option for a Scottish parliament approved referendum of the people of Scotland in support of an independent Queen's state of Scotland.

    Either way the referendum will be rigged to keep the Queen and deny real Scottish national independence.
    Peter Dow's Scottish National Standard Bearer website
    and check my profile here for a visitor message I posted which summarizes my core politics.

Page 4 of 17 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks